Glomus tumor historical perspective
Glomus tumor Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Glomus tumor historical perspective On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Glomus tumor historical perspective |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Glomus tumor historical perspective |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Soujanya Thummathati, MBBS [2]
Overview
Glomus body was first discovered by Hoyer, a polish anatomist, in 1877. Glomus tumor was first described in 1924 by Barre and Masson.
Historical Perspective
- Glomus tumor was first described by Wood in the Edinburgh Medical Journal of 1812.[1]
- However, Wood described it as a small, bluish, benign, subcutaneous nodule associated with severe paroxysmal pain and tenderness.
- He called this lesion a “painful subcutaneous tubercle.”
- In 1878, Kolaczek described the subungual location of a painful tubercle, which he believed to be a variant of angiosarcoma.
- Glomus tumor was first correctly described by Barre and Masson in 1924.[1][2][3]
- They correctly interpreted the pathologic anatomy of the painful tubercle.
- Barre and Masson called it a glomus tumor because of its relationship to the normal neuromyoarterial glomus.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Garman ME, Orengo IF, Netscher D, Schwartz MR, Rosen T (2003). "On glomus tumors, warts, and razors". Dermatol Surg. 29 (2): 192–4. PMID 12562354.
- ↑ Park, Dong Sun; Choe, Woo Jin; Chun, Young Il; Moon, Chang-Taek (2013). "Glomus Tumor in the Femoral Nerve". Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 54 (6): 540. doi:10.3340/jkns.2013.54.6.540. ISSN 2005-3711.
- ↑ Veros, Konstantinos; Markou, Konstantinos; Filitatzi, Chrysa; Kyrmizakis, Dionysios E. (2012). "Glomus Tumor of the Cheek: A Case Report". Case Reports in Medicine. 2012: 1–3. doi:10.1155/2012/307294. ISSN 1687-9627.