Thrombophilia laboratory findings

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thrombophilia Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Thrombophilia from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

X Ray

CT

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Thrombophilia laboratory findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Thrombophilia laboratory findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Thrombophilia laboratory findings

CDC on Thrombophilia laboratory findings

Thrombophilia laboratory findings in the news

Blogs on Thrombophilia laboratory findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Thrombophilia

Risk calculators and risk factors for Thrombophilia laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Asiri Ediriwickrema, M.D., M.H.S. [2]

Overview

Laboratory findings consistent with the diagnosis of inherited thrombophilias vary based on the etiology of the thrombus.[1]

  • The available evidence suggests that testing for inherited thrombophilia is not recommended in most clinical settings. In patients without a personal history of VTE, thrombophilia results do not change management, as there is no evidence to support thromboprophylaxis in this setting. In patients with a personal history of provoked or unprovoked VTE, inpatient testing is not indicated, as results do not influence management, testing is not cost-effective, and a positive test result may lead to unnecessary patient anxiety or may result in unnecessary involvement of consultants. Testing in hospitalized patients has even more limitations because many thrombophilia tests are inaccurate in the setting of acute VTE and/or anticoagulation. Depending on the underlying condition and expression of the genetic abnormality, the relative risk of VTE in patients with inherited thrombophilia is 3- to 20-fold greater than that of the general population. Therefore, it is logical to consider that testing for inherited thrombophilia might be clinically useful. thrombophilia testing may divert attention away from the management of more prevalent, potentially modifiable risk factors such as immobility, oral contraceptive use, or malignancy, all of which are associated with recurrent VTE. However, the evidence for doing so is very limited. Testing should only be considered using an individualized approach in the outpatient setting with appropriate genetic counseling.
  • Acquired thrombophilias and preferred approach to diagnostic workup:
    • Surgery, trauma, immobility, hospitalization, indwelling catheter, high estrogen state: History (transient/reversible risk factors)
    • Myeloproliferative neoplasm: Mutation analysis for JAK2, CALR, MPL
    • Malignancy, SLE/collagen vascular disease, nephrotic syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, obesity: History/examination, basic laboratory tests (CBC, renal/ hepatic panels,

urinalysis for protein), chest radiograph, age-appropriate cancer screening

    • Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: If suspected, CBC, haptoglobin, LDH, total/direct bilirubin, iron studies, urinalysis; peripheral blood flow cytometry
    • APLS: Revised Sapporo criteria (both required): clinical, vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity; laboratory, 1 of the following on $2 occasions at least 12 weeks apart: IgG or IgM anti-cardiolipin antibodies (.40 U); IgG or IgM anti-b2-glycoprotein I antibodies (.40 U); LA

Laboratory Findings

Variability in thrombophilia testing

Timing

Type of tests

Tests for thrombophilia are categorized according to their priority, as summarized below.

  • High priority testing should be conducted if thrombophilia screening conditions are met.
  • Intermediate and low priority testing should be completed in the appropriate clinical context.
Priority Timing Test Associated Diagnosis
High Complete blood count General
Coagulation studies: INR, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time General
Factor V Leiden mutation studies Factor V Leiden
Prothrombin 20210 gene mutation Prothrombin G20210A
Lupus anticoagulant Antiphospholipid syndrome
Anticardiolipin antibodies Antiphospholipid syndrome
Delay 6 months Functional assay for antithrombin (antithrombin-heparin co-factor assay) Antithrombin deficiency
Delay 6 months Protein C functional assay (preferred over plasma protein levels) Protein C deficiency
Delay 6 months Free protein S immunoassay Protein S deficiency
Intermediate Factor VIII level (use c-reactive protein as control) Factor VIII disorders
Flow cytometry Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria
Peripheral blood smear, JAK2 mutation studies Myeloproliferative disorders
Homocysteine level Hyperhomocysteinemia
Vitamin B12 level Hyperhomocysteinemia
Low Thrombin time General/Fibrinogen disorders
Fibrinogen level Fibrinogen disorders
Reptilase time General/Fibrinogen disorders
Plasminogen level Plasminogen disorders
Factor IX activity Factor IX disorders
Factor X activity Factor X disorders
  • Protein C deficiency: Diagnostic testing for protein C deficiency is performed using functional assays including clotting assays, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and chromogenic tests to determine levels of protein C activity. Mutational analysis of the PROC gene is also available.
  • Emergency room: When patients present to the emergency department with signs and symptoms suggestive of possible venous thrombosis (see previous section H&P findings), a well-validated scale known as the modified Wells' criteria is applied to help guide further diagnostic studies. For patients with high Wells score, a serum D-dimer should be checked. The D-dimer is a fibrin degradation product that is present in the blood after fibrinolysis. Its elevation is very sensitive (though less specific) to detect venous thrombosis. It is important to note that a D-dimer could also be elevated in other patients such as pregnant and post-surgical patients, or those with underlying malignancy. However, it aids clinicians in deciding whether to pursue further diagnostic imaging. A negative D-dimer result helps to rule out a clot and avoid unnecessary imaging studies or anticoagulation initiation. The pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) is also occasionally applied to help decide whether the patient has developed an acute pulmonary embolism (PE), though not applicable for DVT. The modified Wells score can also be used if physicians suspect an acute DVT. When there is a high pretest probability for PE or DVT, imaging studies should be completed immediately without regard to D-dimer levels. For pulmonary embolism, the recommended imaging studies are CT angiography and ventilation/perfusion imaging (V/Q scan). The V/Q scan is sometimes preferred over CTPA to avoid radiation exposure or intravenous contrast in those with underlying renal impairment. However, not all facilities have V/Q scanning capabilities or expertise at interpreting the results, so CTPA is often used. Often, pulmonary emboli result from fragmentation of preexisting thrombosis in an extremity (i.e., DVT). Hence, compression sonography (Duplex US) of lower and/or upper extremities is also often performed to evaluate for concurrent DVT. This is especially important if a provoking catheter-related thrombosis is suspected, as the catheter may require eventual removal.
  • Determining whether a blood clot classifies as provoked (most common) vs. unprovoked, and whether it is the first episode vs. subsequent are critical aspects of the initial evaluation that can guide further workup and treatment. Clinicians should take a careful personal and family history to document any thrombosis history or pregnancy morbidity. In carefully selected patients suspected of having an underlying hereditary thrombophilia, a targeted hypercoagulable workup may be indicated. Such testing may include checking the amount of protein C and S, antithrombin III, or mutational testing for factor V Leiden or Prothrombin gene mutation. Acquired thrombophilia testing may also be indicated, such as antiphospholipid antibody testing. In general, a full hypercoagulable workup is rarely necessary and strongly discouraged on initial presentation in the absence of subspecialty evaluation with a hematologist; this is especially true in the acute setting, as many factors can affect the accuracy of test results (e.g., acute inflammation or consumption of coagulation factors due to acute thrombosis can lead to falsely low levels of some coagulation factors). Anticoagulation therapy can also interfere with the interpretation of test results in the acute setting (e.g., heparin can affect the interpretation of Antithrombin III). For antiphospholipid antibody testing, many medications (including several anticoagulants), as well as underlying connective tissue diseases such as SLE, can affect the testing result and interpretation of the lupus anticoagulant. When antiphospholipid antibody testing is indicated, the recommendation is that the tests be repeated 12 weeks apart. As such, clinicians should reserve such hypercoagulable testing to carefully selected patients (e.g., young patients with unprovoked thrombosis or in those with confirmed or strong family history thrombophilia). This testing is often performed in the outpatient setting after the acute phase of the thrombosis has resolved and under the guidance of a hematologist consultant.
  • Malignancy: Malignancy can be an underlying provoking factor for thrombosis (both venous and arterial). In general, it is not recommended for patients to have an extensive malignancy workup in the absence of any clinical factors to suggest underlying malignancy as the provoking cause. Age-appropriate cancer screening is recommended for all patients. In carefully selected patients, especially in those over the age of 50 with seemingly unprovoked thrombosis, in whom malignancy is a possibility, further evaluation to search for occult malignancy as the culprit may be indicated.
  • The most recent NICE guidelines recommend against offering inherited thrombophilia testing to patients presenting with a provoked VTE in any clinical setting. In patients diagnosed with unprovoked VTE, testing should not be considered unless a first degree relative with a history of VTE exists. The NICE guidelines also recommend against routinely offering thrombophilia testing to asymptomatic first-degree relatives of patients with a history of VTE or known inherited thrombophilia. This recommendation is reflected in the American Society of Hematology’s Choosing Wisely recommendations since 2013. The available evidence suggests that clinicians should avoid ordering thrombophilia testing for hospitalized patients with unprovoked VTE because (1) many thrombophilia tests are inaccurate in the setting of acute VTE and/or anticoagulation, (2) results of testing often do not influence management, (3) testing is not cost-effective, (4) a positive test result may lead to unnecessary patient anxiety, and (5) testing may result in inappropriately prolonged anticoagulation courses or unnecessary involvement of inpatient consultants.
  • Common thrombophilia tests:
    • Testing for V Leiden: Activated protein C (APC) resistance test and/or factor V Leiden genetic test
    • Prothrombin (factor II) G20210A genetic test
    • Protein C activity
    • Protein S activity, free protein S antigen
    • Antithrombin activity
    • Antiphospholipid antibodies: Anticardiolipin antibodies, Anti-beta-2-glycoprotein I antibodies, Lupus anticoagulant
    • Other tests: In patients with unexplained clots in the abdomen: JAK-2 mutation, PNH test
    • In young patients (<30 years old) with unexplained vein or artery clots: homocysteine
    • Not to obtain: MTHFR genetic test; factor VIII level; tPA and PAI-1 blood levels or genetic tests
  • Timing of testing for thrombophilia is important because results can be falsely abnormal at the time of the initial clotting episode or while on a

blood-thinner.

  • JAK, Janus kinase 2; PNH, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria; MTHFR, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; tPA, tissue plasminogen activator;

PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1.

  • Indications: Thrombophilia testing may be considered in the following scenarios:
    • A person with venous blood clots in the legs or lungs (DVT or PE) in the “unclear how long” group in Figure 1:
      • Clot associated with only a mild trigger (minor surgery, minor immobility or short-distance travel, birth-control pill, patch or ring).
      • Clot that is unprovoked (idiopathic) but where the person is (i) at increased risk for bleeding or (ii) has a strong preference not to be on a blood thinner.
    • A person with an unexplained blood clot in a vein in an unusual location (such as in the veins of the abdomen or surrounding the brain).
    • A person who has never had a clot, but who has a first-degree relative with a strong thrombophilia (mother, father, sister, brother, child).
    • Unexplained arterial blood clot in a young person.
    • Recurrent miscarriages with no other cause.
    • Patient requests testing: Patient with a blood clot in the legs or lungs that is unprovoked or due to a minor risk factor who requests testing to understand why he/she developed a clot.
  • Indications for Venous Thrombophilia Screening:
    • Age <50 years
    • Women with VTE during pregnancy or puerperium
    • Women with VTE during use of oral contraceptive or hormonal replacement
    • Women with VTE before prescribing hormonal replacement
    • Women with multiple inexplicable pregnancy losses
    • Young women with a positive family history, before prescribing oral contraceptive
    • VTE in unusual sites
    • First VTE and a positive family history for VTE
    • Young patients with arterial ischemia and right-to-left shunt (paradoxical embolism)

References

  1. Seligsohn U, Lubetsky A (2001). "Genetic susceptibility to venous thrombosis". N Engl J Med. 344 (16): 1222–31. doi:10.1056/NEJM200104193441607. PMID 11309638.
  2. Cohoon KP, Heit JA (2014). "Inherited and secondary thrombophilia". Circulation. 129 (2): 254–7. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001943. PMC 3979345. PMID 24421360.
  3. Stevens SM, Woller SC, Bauer KA, Kasthuri R, Cushman M, Streiff M; et al. (2016). "Guidance for the evaluation and treatment of hereditary and acquired thrombophilia". J Thromb Thrombolysis. 41 (1): 154–64. doi:10.1007/s11239-015-1316-1. PMC 4715840. PMID 26780744.

Template:WH Template:WS