Congestive heart failure cardiac MRI
Resident Survival Guide |
Congestive Heart Failure Microchapters |
Pathophysiology |
---|
Differentiating Congestive heart failure from other Diseases |
Diagnosis |
Treatment |
Medical Therapy: |
Surgical Therapy: |
ACC/AHA Guideline Recommendations
|
Specific Groups: |
Congestive heart failure cardiac MRI On the Web |
Directions to Hospitals Treating Congestive heart failure cardiac MRI |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Congestive heart failure cardiac MRI |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Zand, M.D.[2] Edzel Lorraine Co, DMD, MD[3]
Overview
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), T1 mapping, and extracellular volume may diagnosis myocardial fibrosis/scar in subendocardial area for patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and scar in mid-wall area for dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Moreover, CMR may identify myocardial characterization including myocarditis, amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, Chagas disease, Fabry disease, LV non-compaction cardiomyopathy, haemochromatosis, and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.
Cardiac MRI
=2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines
Class I |
LV non-compaction,amyloid, sarcoidosis, iron overload/hemochromatosis(Level of Evidence: C) |
Class IIa |
|
The above table adopted from 2021 ESC Guideline |
---|
Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA)
- Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) may be considered in patients with a low to intermediate pre-test probability ofCAD, or equivocal result of
non-invasive stress tests in order to exclude the diagnosis of CAD.[2]
Class IIa |
"Coronary CT angiography should be considered in patients with a low to intermediate pre-test probability of CAD or those with equivocal non-invasive stress tests in order to rule out coronary artery stenosis.(Level of Evidence: C) " |
The above table adopted from 2021 ESC Guideline |
---|
Class IIa |
"Endomyocardial biopsy should be considered in patients with rapidly progressive HF despite standard therapy when there is a probability of a specific diagnosis, which can be confirmed only in myocardial samples.(Level of Evidence: C) " |
The above table adopted from 2021 ESC Guideline |
---|
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, Burri H, Butler J, Čelutkienė J, Chioncel O, Cleland J, Coats A, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam C, Lyon AR, McMurray J, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Francesco Piepoli M, Price S, Rosano G, Ruschitzka F, Kathrine Skibelund A (September 2021). "2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure". Eur Heart J. 42 (36): 3599–3726. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368. PMID 34447992 Check
|pmid=
value (help). Vancouver style error: initials (help) - ↑ Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, Prescott E, Storey RF, Deaton C, Cuisset T, Agewall S, Dickstein K, Edvardsen T, Escaned J, Gersh BJ, Svitil P, Gilard M, Hasdai D, Hatala R, Mahfoud F, Masip J, Muneretto C, Valgimigli M, Achenbach S, Bax JJ (January 2020). "2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes". Eur Heart J. 41 (3): 407–477. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425. PMID 31504439.