Major depressive disorder monitoring response to therapy

Revision as of 03:32, 17 January 2024 by Badgettrg (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NOTOC__ {{Major depressive disorder}} {{RGB}} ==Overview== Various definitions have been proposed for a response (Reliable Change Index (RCI)) and a remission to treatment. * PHQ-9 score of ≤9 combined with improvement of 50% (the original definition)<ref name="pmid11556941">{{cite journal| author=Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB| title=The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. | journal=J Gen Intern Med | year= 2001 | volume= 16 | issue= 9 | pag...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Major depressive disorder Microchapters

Home

Major Depressive Disorder (Patient Information)

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Major depressive disorder from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Substance/Medication-induced Depressive Disorder

Depressive Disorder due to a Medical Condition

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Psychotherapy

ECT

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Follow-up

Follow-Up

Case Studies

Case #1

Major depressive disorder monitoring response to therapy On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Major depressive disorder monitoring response to therapy

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Robert G. Badgett, M.D.[1]

Overview

Various definitions have been proposed for a response (Reliable Change Index (RCI)) and a remission to treatment.

  • PHQ-9 score of ≤9 combined with improvement of 50% (the original definition)[1]
  • 30% reduction in a score[2].
  • the "response mean (difference of mean scores at 2 assessment points divided by standard deviation of score changes)...to compute the 95% confidence intervals of the standardized response means"[3]
  • Jacobson has suggested[4]:
    • "The level of functioning subsequent to therapy should fall outside the range of the dysfunctional population, where range is denned as extending to two standard deviations beyond (in the direction of functionality) the mean for that population."
    • "The level of functioning subsequent to therapy should fall within the range of the functional or normal population, where range is defined as within two standard deviations of the mean of that population."
    • "The level of functioning subsequent to therapy places that client closer to the mean of the functional population than it does to the mean of the dysfunctional population."


References

  1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB (2001). "The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure". J Gen Intern Med. 16 (9): 606–13. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. PMC 1495268. PMID 11556941.
  2. Ramsay JR (2017). "Assessment and monitoring of treatment response in adult ADHD patients: current perspectives". Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 13: 221–232. doi:10.2147/NDT.S104706. PMC 5291336. PMID 28184164.
  3. Löwe B, Unützer J, Callahan CM, Perkins AJ, Kroenke K (2004). "Monitoring depression treatment outcomes with the patient health questionnaire-9". Med Care. 42 (12): 1194–201. doi:10.1097/00005650-200412000-00006. PMID 15550799.
  4. Jacobson NS, Truax P (1991). "Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research". J Consult Clin Psychol. 59 (1): 12–9. doi:10.1037//0022-006x.59.1.12. PMID 2002127.


Template:WikiDoc Sources