Atrial septal defect percutaneous closure

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Atrial Septal Defect Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Anatomy

Classification

Ostium Secundum Atrial Septal Defect
Ostium Primum Atrial Septal Defect
Sinus Venosus Atrial Septal Defect
Coronary Sinus
Patent Foramen Ovale
Common or Single Atrium

Pathophysiology

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural History and Prognosis

Complications

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography

Transesophageal Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography
Contrast Echocardiography
M-Mode
Doppler

Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound

Cardiac Catheterization

Exercise Testing

ACC/AHA Guidelines for Evaluation of Unoperated Patients

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Indications for Surgical Repair
Surgical Closure
Minimally Invasive Repair


Robotic ASD Repair
Percutaneous Closure
Post-Surgical Follow Up

Special Scenarios

Pregnancy
Diving and Decompression Sickness
Paradoxical Emboli
Pulmonary Hypertension
Eisenmenger's Syndrome
Atmospheric Pressure

Case Studies

Case #1

Atrial septal defect percutaneous closure On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Atrial septal defect percutaneous closure

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Atrial septal defect percutaneous closure

CDC on Atrial septal defect percutaneous closure

Atrial septal defect percutaneous closure in the news

Blogs on Atrial septal defect percutaneous closure

Directions to Hospitals Treating Type page name here

Risk calculators and risk factors for Atrial septal defect percutaneous closure

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editors-In-Chief: Priyamvada Singh, MBBS [[2]]; Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [3]; Assistant Editor-In-Chief: Kristin Feeney, B.S. [[4]]

Overview

The Amplatzer septal occlude devices (ASO) can be used to successfully close selected oval fossa defects in adults. With proper patient selection these devices have excellent prognosis and minimal complications. The Food and Drug Administration has only authorized the use of percutaneous closure in ostium secundum patients.

Mechanisms of benefit

The Ampltazer septal occluder (ASO) is the most commonly used device as it allows closure of large cavities, is easy to implant, and boasts high success rates. As an instrument, the ASO consists of two self-expandable round discs connected to each other with a 4-mm waist, made up of 0.004–0.005´´ nitinol wire mesh filled with Dacron fabric. Implantation of the device is relatively easy. The prevalence of residual defect is low. It occludes the opening and benefits by preventing the shunting of blood across the lesion.

Indication

Percutaneous transcatheter closure is currently only indicated for the closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defects. In patients with a secundum defect, there must be a sufficient rim of tissue around the septal defect.

Contra-indications

It should not be used in patients with sinus venosus, primum or patent foramen ovale atrial septal defects.

Types of occluders

The Food and Drug Administration has authorized the following percutaenous transcatheters for usage:[1]. The Amplatzer septal occluder (ASO) is currently the most widely used device because it is easy to implant and has high success rates. It first came to be used for human subjects in 1995. However, the device is still not approved for usage in percutaneous closure of ostium primum and sinus venosus defects.

  • Amplatzer septal occluder
  • CardioSEAL
  • HELEX septal occluder
  • Sideris patch

Pre-surgical considerations

Prior to undergoing percutaneous closure, eligible atrial septal defect patients must undergo pharmacologic preparation therapy. Most therapy regimens include antiplatelet drugs to protect patients against thrombus formation. Prior to percutaneous closure, ostium secundum atrial septal defect patients undergo antiplatelet therapy such as aspirin or clopidogrel for a minimum of six months. This antiplatelet therapy protects patients against thrombus formation.

Secundum defects are assessed via echocardiographic monitoring to determine the anatomic viability of percutaneous closure. The ideal secundum defect is less than 30mm in diameter with an accompanying rim of tissue around the defect of at least 5mm. This rim of tissue serves to prevent impingement upon the superior vena cava (SVC), inferior vena cava (IVC), as well as the tricuspid or mitral valves.[2]


Per-cutaneous closure

The salient feature of the percutaneous device closure are-

  • Devices placed via femoral vein.
  • Best results are for centrally located secundum defects.
  • Static diameter of the defect assessed by using TEE.
  • The diameter is then measured with a sizing balloon
  • A 'stop-flow' technique is used to select the proper diameter of the device.
  • The sizing balloon is inflated until no flow is visible through the defect using TEE.
  • The margins of the defect must be ≤5 mm to accommodate the edges of the device.
  • TEE used for determining the device size, position, and deployment, but it can cause discomfort

Percutaneous v/s Surgical closure

In a multicenter, non-randomized study performed in 29 pediatric cardiology centers, the patients were allotted to either the device group or the surgical closure group depending on their preference. The success rate of the surgery was similar in the per-cutaneous and the surgical groups. However, the complication rate was more in the surgical (24%) compared to the percutaneous group (7.2%). Also, the mean hospital stay was 3 days in surgical group compared to 1 day in the percutaneous device group. With appropriate patient selection, device closure could be very successful. Also, it is safe and effective compared to other modalities [3]. Another disadvantage with surgical closure is that it requires sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass.

Benefits

Complications

ACC/AHA recommendations for interventional and surgical therapy

Supportive trial data

In a study done on 236 patients with secundum atrial septal defects (ASD), to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter closure with the amplatzer septal occlude, the device was found to be very efficient. It causes atrial septal defect closure in 84.7% of the treated patient population. During a median follow up of 2.3 years complete closure was documented in 94%, with a residual shunt only in 12 patients. Two of the treated patients were reported to have procedure related complications like retroperitoneal bleeding and air embolism.[4]


<youtube v=Gros-u7YCTk/>

<youtube v=4c3CEgjj2PY/>

References

  1. Schwetz BA (2002). "From the Food and Drug Administration". JAMA. 287 (5): 578. PMID 11829678.
  2. Ferreira SM, Ho SY, Anderson RH (1992). "Morphological study of defects of the atrial septum within the oval fossa: implications for transcatheter closure of left-to-right shunt". Br Heart J. 67 (4): 316–20. PMC 1024841. PMID 1389707.
  3. Du ZD, Hijazi ZM, Kleinman CS, Silverman NH, Larntz K, Amplatzer Investigators (2002). "Comparison between transcatheter and surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect in children and adults: results of a multicenter nonrandomized trial". J Am Coll Cardiol. 39 (11): 1836–44. PMID 12039500.
  4. Fischer G, Stieh J, Uebing A, Hoffmann U, Morf G, Kramer HH (2003). "Experience with transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects using the Amplatzer septal occluder: a single centre study in 236 consecutive patients". Heart. 89 (2): 199–204. PMC 1767528. PMID 12527678.

Template:WH Template:WS