Appendicitis

Error creating thumbnail: File missing

Location of the appendix in the digestive system

WikiDoc Resources for Appendicitis
Articles
Most recent articles on Appendicitis Most cited articles on Appendicitis Review articles on Appendicitis Articles on Appendicitis in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ
Media
Powerpoint slides on Appendicitis Images of Appendicitis Photos of Appendicitis Podcasts & MP3s on Appendicitis Videos on Appendicitis
Evidence Based Medicine
Cochrane Collaboration on Appendicitis Bandolier on Appendicitis TRIP on Appendicitis
Clinical Trials
Ongoing Trials on Appendicitis at Clinical Trials.gov Trial results on Appendicitis Clinical Trials on Appendicitis at Google
Guidelines / Policies / Govt
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Appendicitis NICE Guidance on Appendicitis NHS PRODIGY Guidance FDA on Appendicitis CDC on Appendicitis
Books
Books on Appendicitis
News
Appendicitis in the news Be alerted to news on Appendicitis News trends on Appendicitis
Commentary
Blogs on Appendicitis
Definitions
Definitions of Appendicitis
Patient Resources / Community
Patient resources on Appendicitis Discussion groups on Appendicitis Patient Handouts on Appendicitis Directions to Hospitals Treating Appendicitis Risk calculators and risk factors for Appendicitis
Healthcare Provider Resources
Symptoms of Appendicitis Causes & Risk Factors for Appendicitis Diagnostic studies for Appendicitis Treatment of Appendicitis
Continuing Medical Education (CME)
CME Programs on Appendicitis
International
Appendicitis en Espanol Appendicitis en Francais
Business
Appendicitis in the Marketplace Patents on Appendicitis
Experimental / Informatics
List of terms related to Appendicitis

For patient information click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Synonyms and keywords: Epityphlitis

Overview

Appendicitis is a condition characterized by inflammation of the appendix. While mild cases may resolve without treatment, most require removal of the inflamed appendix, either by laparotomy or laparoscopy. Untreated, mortality is high, mainly due to peritonitis and shock. Reginald Fitz first described acute appendicitis in 1886, and it has been recognized as one of the most common causes of acute abdomen pain worldwide. Appendicitis is usually accompanied by Abdominal pain, anorexia,fever, and nausea or vomiting

Causes

On the basis of experimental evidence, acute appendicitis seems to be the end result of a primary obstruction of the appendix lumen. Once this obstruction occurs the appendix subsequently becomes filled with mucus and distends, increasing intraluminal and intramural pressures, resulting in thrombosis and occlusion of the small vessels, and stasis of lymphatic flow. As these progress, the appendix becomes ischemic and then necrotic. Rarely, spontaneous recovery can occur at this point. As bacteria begin to leak out through the dying walls, pus forms within and around the appendix (suppuration). The end result of this cascade is appendiceal rupture causing peritonitis, which may lead to septicemia and eventually death. Among the causative agents, such as foreign bodies, trauma, intestinal worms, and lymphadenitis, the occurrence of an obstructing fecalith has attracted attention. The prevalence of fecaliths in patients with appendicitis is significantly higher in developed than in developing countries, and an appendiceal fecalith is commonly associated with complicated appendicitis. Also, fecal stasis and arrest may play a role, as demonstrated by a significantly lower number of bowel movements per week in patients with acute appendicitis compared with healthy controls. The occurrence of a faecalith in the appendix seems to be attributed to a right sided faecal retention reservoir in the colon and a prolonged transit time. From epidemiological data it has been stated that diverticular disease and adenomatous polyps were unknown and colon cancer exceedingly rare in communities exempt for appendicitis. Also, acute appendicitis has been shown to occur antecedent to cancer in the colon and rectum. Several studies offer evidence that a low fibre intake is involved in the pathogenesis of appendicitis. This is in accordance with the occurrence of a right sided fecal reservoir and that dietary fibre reduces transit time. Other causes might include:

• Appendicolith
• Ascariasis
• Bacteroides
• Fecaloma
• Taenia infection

Differential diagnosis of conditions to distinguish from appendicitis

According to age group;

In children:

• Gastroenteritis
• Mesenteric adenitis
• Meckel's diverticulum
• Intussusception
• Henoch-Schõnlein purpura
• Lobar pneumonia

In adults:

• Regional enteritis
• Renal colic
• Perforated peptic ulcer
• Testicular torsion
• Pancreatitis
• Rectus sheath hematoma
• Pelvic inflammatory disease
• Ectopic pregnancy
• Endometriosis
• Torsion/rupture of ovarian cyst
• Ruptured Graafian follicle

In the elderly:

• Diverticulitis
• Intestinal obstruction
• Colonic carcinoma
• Mesenteric infarction
• Leaking aortic aneurysm.

Other causes mimicking appendicitis at any age

In general:

• Acute Gastroenteritis
• Luminal obstruction:

  • Barium
  • Fecaliths
  • Foreign body
  • Fruit seeds
  • Hypertrophy of the lymphatic tissue
  • Parasites
  • Stricture

Symptoms

Symptoms of acute appendicitis can be classified into two types, typical and atypical (Hobler, K., 1998). The typical history includes pain starting centrally (periumbilical) before localizing to the right iliac fossa (the lower right side of the abdomen); this is due to the poor localizing (spatial) property of visceral nerves from the mid-gut, followed by the involvement of somatic nerves (parietal peritoneum) as the inflammation progresses. The pain is usually associated with loss of appetite and fever, although the latter isn't a necessary symptom. Nausea or vomiting may or may not occur. With the typical type, diagnosis is easier to make, surgery occurs earlier and findings are often less severe (Hobler, K., 1998).

Atypical symptoms may include pain beginning and staying in the right iliac fossa, diarrhea and a more prolonged, smoldering course. If an inflamed appendix lies in contact with the bladder, there is frequency of micturition. With post-ileal appendix, marked retching may occur. Being more difficult to diagnose, CT scans and ultrasound tests are more useful. Surgical findings are more apt to be severe (suppuration, abscess, perforation, etc.(Hobler,K., 1998).

Signs

These include localized findings in the right iliac fossa. The abdominal wall becomes very sensitive to gentle pressure (palpation). Also, there is rebound tenderness. In case of a retrocaecal appendix, however, even deep pressure in the right lower quadrant may fail to elicit tenderness (silent appendix), the reason being that the caecum, distended with gas, prevents the pressure exerted by the palpating hand from reaching the inflamed appendix. Similarly, if the appendix lies entirely within the pelvis, there is usually complete absence of the abdominal rigidity. In such cases, a digital rectal examination elicits tenderness in the rectovesical pouch. Coughing causes point tenderness in this area (McBurney's Point) and this is the least painful way to localize the inflamed appendix. If the abdomen on palpation is also involuntarily guarded (rigid), there should be a strong suspicion of peritonitis requiring urgent surgical intervention. Other signs are:

Rovsing's sign

Deep palpation of the left iliac fossa may cause pain in the right iliac fossa. Also known as: Rovsing's symptom

Associated persons: Niels Thorkild Rovsing

Description: A sign used in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Pressure over the descending colon causes pain in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen.

Bibliography:

Psoas sign

Occasionally, an inflamed appendix lies on the psoas muscle and the patient will lie with the right hip flexed for pain relief.

Obturator sign

If an inflamed appendix is in contact with the obturator internus, spasm of the muscle can be demonstrated by flexing and internally rotating the hip. This manouvre will cause pain in the hypogastrium.

Investigations

Diagnosis is based on patient history (symptoms) and physical examination backed by an elevation of neutrophilic white cells. Atypical histories often requires ultrasound and/or CT scanning (Hobler, K., 1998).

Ultrasonography and Doppler sonography provide useful means to detect appendicitis, especially in children. In some cases (15% approximately), however, ultrasonography of the iliac fossa does not reveal any abnormalities despite the presence of appendicitis. This is especially true of early appendicitis before the appendix has become significantly distended and in adults where larger amounts of fat and bowel gas make actually seeing the appendix technically difficult. Despite these limitations, in experienced hands sonographic imaging can often distinguish between appendicitis and other diseases with very similar symptoms such as inflammation of lymph nodes near the appendix or pain originating from other pelvic organs such as the ovaries or fallopian tubes.

In places where it is readily available, CT scan has become the diagnostic test of choice, especially in adults whose diagnosis is not obvious on history and physical. (The use of CT in pregnant women and children is significantly limited, however, by concerns regarding radiation exposure.) A properly performed CT scan with modern equipment has a detection rate (sensitivity) of over 95% and a similar specificity. Signs of appendicitis on CT scan include lack of contrast (oral dye) in the appendix and direct visualization of appendiceal enlargement (greater than 6 mm in diameter on cross section). The inflammation caused by appendicitis in the surrounding peritoneal fat (so called "fat stranding") can also be observed on CT, providing a mechanism to detect early appendicitis and a clue that appendicitis may be present even when the appendix is not well seen. Thus, diagnosis of appendicitis by CT is made more difficult in very thin patients and in children, both of whom tend to lack significant fat within the abdomen. The utility of CT scanning is made clear, however, by the impact it has had on negative appendectomy rates. For example, use of CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in Boston, MA has decreased the chance of finding a normal appendix at surgery from 20% in the pre-CT era to only 3% according to data from the Massachusetts General Hospital.

According to a systematic review from UC-San Francisco comparing ultrasound vs. CT scan, CT scan is more accurate than ultrasound for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adults and adolescents. CT scan has a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 95%, a positive likelihood ratio of 13.3 (CI, 9.9 to 17.9), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.09 (CI, 0.07 to 0.12). Ultrasonography had an overall sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 81%, a positive likelihood ratio of 5.8 (CI, 3.5 to 9.5), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.19 (CI, 0.13 to 0.27). PMID 15466771

A number of clinical and laboratory based scoring systems have been devised to assist diagnosis. The most widely used is Alvarado score.

Alvarado score

Symptoms:

• migratory right iliac fossa pain, 1 point
• anorexia, 1 point
• nausea and vomiting, 1 point

Signs:

• right iliac fossa tenderness, 2 points
• rebound tenderness, 1 point
• fever, 1 point

Laboratory:

• leucocytosis, 2 points
• shift to left( segmented neutrophils), 1 point

Total score = 10.

A score of 7 or more is strongly predictive of acute appendicitis.
In patients with an equivocal score of 5-6, CT scan further reduces the rate of negative appendicectomy.

CT

• Appendiceal thickening with the outer-wall-to-outer-wall transverse diameter greater than 6 mm.

• • Some authors define appendiceal thickening on CT as transverse diameter greater than 7 mm
  • The appendiceal diameter probably should be interpreted in the context of clinical and other

• Appendiceal wall thickening (wall ≥ 3mm)

• • Appendiceal wall hyperenhancement
  • Mural stratification of the appendiceal wall
  • Appendicolith(s) (present in one third of patients with appendicitis).

• Cecal apical thickening (diffuse as opposed to apical cecal thickening is also possible, but this is less specific for appendicitis).
• Periappendiceal inflammation includes periappendiceal fat stranding, thickening of the lateral conal fascia, and mesoappendix, extraluminal fluid, phlegmon, abscess, ileocecal mild lymph node enlargement, and inflammatory thickening of contiguous structures.

Patient #1: Right lower quadrant pain

• 
• 
• 
• 

Patient #2: Right lower quadrant pain

• 
• 

Patient #3: Right lower quadrant pain

• 
• 
• 
• 

Treatment

The treatment begins by keeping the patient from eating or drinking anything, even water, in preparation for surgery. An intravenous drip is used to hydrate the patient. Antibiotics given intravenously such as cefuroxime and metronidazole may be administered early to help kill bacteria and thus reduce the spread of infection in the abdomen and postoperative complications in the abdomen or wound. Equivocal cases may become more difficult to assess with antibiotic treatment and benefit from serieal examinations. If the stomach is empty (no food in the past six hours) general anaesthesia is usually used. Otherwise, spinal anaesthesia may be used.

The surgical procedure for the removal of the appendix is called an appendicectomy (also known as an appendectomy). Often now the operation can be performed via a laparoscopic approach, or via three small incisions with a camera to visualize the area of interest in the abdomen. If the findings reveal suppurative appendicitis with complications such as rupture, abscess, adhesions, etc., conversion to open laparotomy may be necessary. An open laparotomy incision if required most often centers on the area of maximum tenderess, McBurney's point, in the right lower quadrant. A transverse or a gridiron diagonal incision is used most commonly.

According to a meta-analysis from the Cochrane Collaboration comparing laparoscopic and open procedures, laparoscopic procedures seem to have various advantages over the open procedure. Wound infections were less likely after laparoscopic appendicectomy than after open appendicectomy (odds ratio 0.45; CI 0.35 to 0.58), but the incidence of intraabdominal abscesses was increased (odds ratio 2.48; CI 1.45 to 4.21). The duration of surgery was 12 minutes (CI 7 to 16) longer for laparoscopic procedures. Pain on day 1 after surgery was reduced after laparoscopic procedures by 9 mm (CI 5 to 13 mm) on a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Hospital stay was shortened by 1.1 day (CI 0.6 to 1.5). Return to normal activity, work, and sport occurred earlier after laparoscopic procedures than after open procedures. While the operation costs of laparoscopic procedures were significantly higher, the costs outside hospital were reduced. Young female, obese, and employed patients seem to benefit from the laparoscopic procedure more than other groups.

Surgery may last from 15 minutes in typical appendicitis in thin patients to several hours in complicated cases. Hospital lengths of stay usually range from overnight to a matter of days (rarely weeks in complicated cases.) The pain is not always constant, in some cases it can stop for a day and then come back.

Prognosis

Most appendicitis patients recover easily with treatment, but complications can occur if treatment is delayed or if peritonitis occurs.

Recovery time depends on age, condition, complications, and other circumstances, including the amount of alcohol consumption, but usually is between 10 and 28 days. For young children (around 10 years old) the recovery takes three weeks.

The real possibility of life-threatening peritonitis is the reason why acute appendicitis warrants speedy evaluation and treatment. The patient may have to undergo a medical evacuation. Appendectomies have occasionally been performed in emergency conditions (i.e. outside of a proper hospital), when a timely medical evaluation was impossible.

Typical acute appendicitis responds quickly to appendectomy and occasionally will resolve spontaneously. If appendicitis resolves spontaneously, it remains controversial whether an elective interval appendectomy should be performed to prevent a recurrent episode of appendicitis. Atypical appendicitis (associated with suppurative appendicitis) is more difficult to diagnose and is more apt to be complicated even when operated early. In either condition prompt diagnosis and appendectomy yield the best results with full recovery in two to four weeks usually. Mortality and severe complications are unusual but do occur, especially if peritonitis persists and is untreated.

An unusual complication of an appendectomy is "stump appendicitis": inflammation occurs in the remnant appendiceal stump left after a prior, incomplete appendectomy.

External links

• Appendicitis - MayoClinic.com, from the Web site of the Mayo Clinic
• Appendicitis Update Review, An updated Issue on Appendicitis
• Surgeons Net Education: Appendicitis, history, diagnosis and treatment
• Appendicitis Research Latest research from the literature on appendicitis
• Acute and Suppurative Appendicitis from the Spring 1998 issue of The Permanente Medical Journal.

Template:WikiDoc Sources