Constitutional delay of puberty history and symptoms

Revision as of 14:27, 20 September 2012 by Shankar Kumar (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Constitutional delay of puberty Microchapters

Home

Overview

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Constitutional delay of puberty from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

X Ray

MRI

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Constitutional delay of puberty history and symptoms On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Constitutional delay of puberty history and symptoms

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Constitutional delay of puberty history and symptoms

CDC on Constitutional delay of puberty history and symptoms

Constitutional delay of puberty history and symptoms in the news

Blogs on Constitutional delay of puberty history and symptoms

Directions to Hospitals Treating Constitutional delay of puberty

Risk calculators and risk factors for Constitutional delay of puberty history and symptoms

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

History and Symptoms

Evaluation

Obviously anyone who is later than average is late in the ordinary sense. There are three indications that pubertal delay may be due to an abnormal cause. The first is simply degree of lateness: although no recommended age of evaluation cleanly separates pathologic from physiologic delay, a delay of 2-3 years or more warrants evaluation.

  • In girls, no breast development by 13 years, or no menarche by 3 years after breast development (or by 16).
  • In boys, no testicular enlargement by 14 years.

The second indicator is discordance of development. In most children, puberty proceeds as a predictable series of changes in specific order. In children with ordinary constitutional delay, all aspects of physical maturation typically remain concordant but a few years later than average. If some aspects of physical development are delayed, and others are not, there is likely something wrong. For instance, in most girls, the beginning stages of breast development precede pubic hair. If a 12 year old girl were to reach Tanner stage 3 pubic hair for a year or more without breast development, it would be unusual enough to suggest an abnormality such as defective ovaries. Similarly, if a 13 year old boy had reached stage 3 or 4 pubic hair with testes that still remained prepubertal in size, it would be unusual and suggestive of a testicular abnormality.

The third indicator is the presence of clues to specific disorders of the reproductive system. For example, malnutrition or anorexia nervosa severe enough to delay puberty will give other clues as well. Poor growth would suggest the possibility of hypopituitarism or Turner syndrome. Reduced sense of smell (hyposmia) suggests Kallmann syndrome.

References

Template:WH Template:WS