E/a ratio
WikiDoc Resources for E/a ratio |
Articles |
---|
Most recent articles on E/a ratio |
Media |
Evidence Based Medicine |
Clinical Trials |
Ongoing Trials on E/a ratio at Clinical Trials.gov Clinical Trials on E/a ratio at Google
|
Guidelines / Policies / Govt |
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on E/a ratio
|
Books |
News |
Commentary |
Definitions |
Patient Resources / Community |
Patient resources on E/a ratio Discussion groups on E/a ratio Directions to Hospitals Treating E/a ratio Risk calculators and risk factors for E/a ratio
|
Healthcare Provider Resources |
Causes & Risk Factors for E/a ratio |
Continuing Medical Education (CME) |
International |
|
Business |
Experimental / Informatics |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [2]
Overview
The E/A ratio is the ratio between early (E) and late (atrial - A) ventricular filling velocity.
The early (E) diastolic wave is caused by accumulation of blood in the atria during previous systole, and second, a late one created by atrial contraction (A).
In a young and compliant heart, early ventricular filling accounts for ~80% of ventricular end diastolic volume (with atrial systole pushing the last ~20% of blood into the ventricle). Thus, the 'E' component of the ratio is greater than the 'A' component. In an aging, less compliant heart, a greater proportion of this blood is pushed into the ventricles during atrial systole. In this scenario, the emphasis of ventricular filling during late diastole increases the 'A' component of the E/A ratio causing a reversal of the ratio.
The reversal of the E:A ratio is widely accepted as a clinical marker of diastolic heart failure.
It can be estimated by doppler echocardiography. [1]
In diastolic dysfunction, a greater portion of end-diastolic volume results from late filling rather than early filling. Therefore, the E/A ratio is reduced in diastolic dysfunction. [1]
The late phase is dependent upon atrial contraction and is therefore absent in patients with atrial fibrillation, making the E/A ratio very large.[1]
The E:A ratio is a first generation test for diastolic performance of the heart.
Diastolic relaxation is divided into four distinct phases during the cardiac cycle:
- Isovolumetric relaxation (abbreviated as IVRT)
- Early filling
- Diastasis
- Atrial contraction.
In short, there are a number of factors that influence ventricular filling during each of these phases, but remember that the main factor is the driving gradient between the atrial and ventricular pressure.
The E/A ratio is measured by placing a pulse wave doppler across the mitral valve, and measuring the velocities across the valve. Hence the other names for the test - transmitral velocity profile or transmitral doppler waveforms.
Pulse wave doppler allows measurement of velocities at a specific point, but has the disadvantage of aliasing, so often has to be adjusted (baseline shifted etc.) to best fit the individual point of measurement.
IVRT is measured as the time between the closure of the aortic valve and the opening of the mitral valve.
The normal transmitral flow profile has two peaks - an E and an A wave.
The E peak arises due to early diastolic filling. Most filling (70-75%) of the ventricle occurs during this phase.
The A peak arises due to atrial contraction, forcing approximately 20-25% of stroke volume into the ventricle.
The deceleration time (DT) is the time taken from the maximum E point to baseline. Normally in adults it is less than 220 milliseconds.
Below is a transthoracic image - for those with TEE/TOE experience, simply invert the image mentally, but the concept is the same.
On the left is a heart with normal diastolic function, and on the right is a heart of impaired relaxation (note the different height of the E and A waves). Note the DT is prolonged - another hallmark of impaired relaxation.
Note too the timing according to the ECG - the waves are being measured prior to the commencement of the QRS complex (the start of systole). The A wave corresponds to the mechanical action of the electrical P wave on the ECG.
Grading of ventricular diastolic dysfunction
From this, a number of grades of diastolic function can be determined:
1. Normal diastolic function (E > A) 2. Impaired relaxation (E:A reversal i.e. E is < A) 3. Pseudonormal (E:A ratio appears normal 4. Restrictive filling (E:A ratio often > 2)
Pseudonormalisation shows a transmitral profile that appears normal, however with the use of pulmonary vein pulse wave doppler, it can be shown that the relaxation pattern is abnormal (systolic blunting, a decrease in the height of the S wave). In addition, performance of a valsalva manouvre will result in unmasking of the pseudonormal state.
Disadvantages
- Cursor position is important - if the PW sample window is incorrect, it will produce artifact. The cursor should be placed at the level of the open leaflets in diastole.
- Presence of mitral valve abormalities e.g. mitral stenosis will alter the pressure gradients and change loading conditions of the LV.
- Presence of AI - aortic incompetence will result in a rapid rise in LV diastolic pressure, limiting the gradient across the mitral valve during diastole.
- Heart rate & rhythm - loss of a normal atrial rhythm e.g. atrial fibrillation will cause loss of the A wave. The heigh of the E wave now becomes dependent on the length of the cardiac cycle (variable) rather than a true measure of diastolic function. Similarly, pacing and tachycardia can result in alterations, whereas bradycardia actually increases the E/A ratio.
These are some of the disadvantages of first generation testing methods.
Diastolic function should be assessed normally in addition to the twenty views. It is important in establishing a number of cardiac conditions - e.g. pericardial tamponade (where E/A ratios across the tricuspid valve are often more important), restrictive pericarditis vs constrictive cardiomyopathy etc.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 [1] Abdul Latif Mohamed, Jun Yong, Jamil Masiyati, Lee Lim, Sze Chec Tee. The Prevalence Of Diastolic Dysfunction In Patients With Hypertension Referred For Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Function. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 1, January 2004, pp. 66-74