Abrupt closure during coronary intervention
Percutaneous coronary intervention Microchapters |
PCI Complications |
---|
PCI in Specific Patients |
PCI in Specific Lesion Types |
Abrupt closure during coronary intervention On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Abrupt closure during coronary intervention |
Directions to Hospitals Treating Percutaneous coronary intervention |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Abrupt closure during coronary intervention |
Editor(s)-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1], Alexandra Almonacid M.D. [2], Jeffrey J. Popma M.D. [3]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hardik Patel, M.D., Sapan Patel M.B.B.S
Overview
Abrupt closure during coronary intervention is defined as an abrupt cessation of coronary flow to TIMI grade 0 or 1 flow in an artery in which PTCA was attempted where there had previously been TIMI grade 2 or 3 flow prior to the procedure. It occurs primarily due to acute coronary dissection, thrombosis, or, most often, a combination of both during coronary intervention.
Definition
Abrupt closure during coronary intervention is defined as an abrupt cessation of coronary flow to TIMI grade 0 or 1 flow in an artery in which PTCA was attempted where there had previously been TIMI grade 2 or 3 flow prior to the procedure. If TIMI flow grade 1 was present prior to dilation, then the development of TIMI flow grade 0 will constitute abrupt closure.
Classification
Abrupt closure can be classified as sustained or transient:
- Sustained abrupt closure: Abrupt closure that has been present when the patient left the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
- Transient abrupt closure: Abrupt closure that has been treated with restoration of coronary flow to TIMI flow grade 2 or 3 before the patient left the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Causes
Abrupt closure occurs primarily as a result of acute coronary dissection, thrombosis, or, most often, a combination of both during coronary intervention. It may also occur as a result of embolization.
Epidemiology and Demographics
It occurs during 3-5% of balloon angioplasty procedures. Its incidence has been markedly reduced with the availability of coronary stents.
Risk Factors[1]
- Clinical: unstable angina, female, AMI, chronic renal failure
- Angiographic: Intraluminal thrombus, ACC/AHA score, multivessel disease, long lesions, >45 degree angulation, branch points, proximal tortuosity, ostial RCA, degenerated SVGs, prestenosis >90%, intimal dissections
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Factors predicting mortality after abrupt closure are as follows:
- % myocardium at risk
- LM and multivessel disease
- CHF, UAP
- Target vessels supplies collaterals
- > age 65 years
- Chronic renal failure
- Female gender
- Diabetes
Treatment
Stent Use in Abrupt Closure
- Gianturco-Roubin stent improves lumen size and reduced MACE
- PS stent improves outcome: mortality 1.3%, MI 4%, 1% CABG
- ACS Multi-Link: mortality 1.4%, MI 2.9%
- Mostly associated with subacute stent thrombosis
- Treatment: Maintain flow, complete coverage.
Abrupt Closure Examples
Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
Case 4
Case 5
Case 6
Case 7
Case 8
Case 9
Case 10
Case 11
Case 12
Case 13
Case 14
Case 15
Case 16
Case 17
Case 18
Case 19
Case 20
Case 21
Case 22
Case 23
Case 24
Case 25
Case 26
References
- ↑ Suh WW, Grill DE, Rihal CS, Bell MR, Holmes DR, Garratt KN (2002). "Unrestricted availability of intracoronary stents is associated with decreased abrupt vascular closure rates and improved early clinical outcomes". Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 55 (3): 294–302. PMID 11870931.