Pulmonary embolism treatment approach

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Pulmonary Embolism Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Pulmonary Embolism from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Triggers

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic criteria

Assessment of Clinical Probability and Risk Scores

Pulmonary Embolism Assessment of Probability of Subsequent VTE and Risk Scores

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Arterial Blood Gas Analysis

D-dimer

Biomarkers

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

Ventilation/Perfusion Scan

Echocardiography

Compression Ultrasonography

CT

MRI

Treatment

Treatment approach

Medical Therapy

IVC Filter

Pulmonary Embolectomy

Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy

Discharge Care and Long Term Treatment

Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Follow-Up

Support group

Special Scenario

Pregnancy

Cancer

Trials

Landmark Trials

Case Studies

Case #1

Pulmonary embolism treatment approach On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Pulmonary embolism treatment approach

CDC on Pulmonary embolism treatment approach

Pulmonary embolism treatment approach in the news

Blogs on Pulmonary embolism treatment approach

Directions to Hospitals Treating Pulmonary embolism treatment approach

Risk calculators and risk factors for Pulmonary embolism treatment approach

Editor(s)-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1], The APEX Trial Investigators; Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Kashish Goel, M.D.; Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2]

Overview

Prompt recognition, diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism is critical. Anticoagulant therapy is the mainstay of treatment for patients who are hemodynamically stable. If hemodynamic compromise is present, then fibrinolytic therapy is recommended.

Treatment Algorithm

Step 1: Establish The Diagnosis Of Pulmonary Embolism

In hospitals that have experience in performing and interpreting CT pulmonary angiography, the following flowchart approach can be adopted.

 
 
 
 
 
 
Clinical assessment for pulmonary embolism

❑ Clinically suspected DVT (leg swelling, pain with palpation): award 3 points
❑ Alternative diagnosis is less likely than PE: award 3 points
❑ Immobilization/surgery in previous four weeks: award 1.5 points
❑ Previous history of DVT or PE: award 1.5 points
❑ Tachycardia (heart rate more than 100 bpm): award 1.5 points
❑ Hemoptysis: award 1 point
❑ Malignancy (treatment for within 6 months, palliative): award 1 point
Interpretation Wells criteria
Score:
>6.0 - High probability of PE
2.0 to 6.0 - Moderate probability of PE
<2.0 - Low probability of PE
Wells score calculator
Interpretation Modified Wells criteria
>4.0 - PE likely

≤4.0 - PE unlikely
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
High probability.
❑ Consider imaging of the pulmonary arteries
 
Moderate probability
❑ Consider checking D-dimer
 
 
Low probability
❑ Consider checking D-dimer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Perform the following investigations

❑ D-dimer

❑ Erythrocyte agglutination assay (takes upto 2 min)
❑ Semi-quantitative latex agglutination assay (takes upto 5 min)
❑ Semi-quantitative rapid ELISA (takes upto 10 min)
❑ Qualitative rapid ELISA (takes upto 10 min)
❑ Quantitative latex agglutination assay (takes upto 15 min)
❑ Quantitative rapid ELISA (takes upto 30 min)

❑ V/Q scan

 
 
PERC(pulmonary embolism rule out criteria) rule

If the patient is presenting with dyspnea, and chest pain in the emergency department, fulfill the following criteria, it excludes PE in the patients with a low clinical suspicion for thromboembolism.

❑ Age <50 years
❑ Tachycardia
❑ Hemoglobin saturation above 95 %
❑ Absent history of hemoptysis
❑ Absent history of estrogen use
❑ Absent history of DVT or PE
❑ Absent history of unilateral leg swelling
❑ Absent history of surgery/trauma requiring hospitalization within the prior four weeks

PERC rule has low positive predictive value and specificity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

❑ High clinical probability with high-probability V/Q scan has 95% chance of having PE.
 
PE can not be excluded

❑ D-dimer level >500 ng/mL
 
PE excluded

❑ Normal V/Q scan

❑ Low clinical probability with low-probability V/Q scan has 4% chance of having PE
❑ D-dimer level <500 ng/mL excludes the diagnosis in low pretest probability

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Perform CT Pulmonary angiography
OR
Pulmonary angiography to confirm the diagnosis of PE

❑ Pulmonary angiography
Contraindicated in renal insufficiency and contrast allergy.

❑ Pulmonary angiography is the "gold standard" in the diagnosis of acute PE.
❑ Embolus is visulized as a filling defect or abrupt cutoff of a small vessel.
❑ Complications includes contrast reactions, cardiac arrhythmia, respiratory insufficiency and those related to the catheter insertion.

CT Pulmonary angiography
Contraindicated in renal insufficiency and contrast allergy.

❑ It can help to diagnose alternative diagnosis which can explain the patient's symptoms and signs.
❑ It is relative quicker procedure to administer.
 
 
Consider alternative diagnosis

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Note: If there is a high clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism, then anticoagulation can begin with a parenteral agent such as unfractionated heparin during the process of performing the diagnostic studies.

Step 2: Use A Risk-Stratified Approach to Treat the Patient with Pulmonary Embolism

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Confirmed PE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assess Clinical
Stability
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unstable
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stable
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Blood Pressure =< 90mm
Drop >=40mm for > 15 min
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assess RV function
Biomarkers of injury
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Thrombolysis
Catheter embolectomy
Surgery
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
No Dysfunction
No Injury
 
Dysfunction
No Injury
 
 
Dysfunction +
Injury
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Anticoagulate
Early Discharge
 
Anticoagulate
Ward admit
 
 
ICU/Thrombolytics

Low Risk Pulmonary Embolism

Low-risk PE: Therapeutic anticoagulation, unless contraindicated.

Sub Massive Pulmonary Embolism

Submassive PE: If the patient is hemodynamically stable without major RV dysfunction or infarction, therapeutic anticoagulation should be started. In some cases, thrombolysis may be indicated.

Massive Pulmonary Embolism

Massive PE: Thrombolysis is indicated and ICU admission may be required. Initial supportive therapies for these patients may include:

  • Respiratory support with oxygen for hypoxemic patients and mechanical ventilation in cases of severe hypoxemia or pending respiratory failure.
  • Hemodynamic support with intravenous fluids or intravenous vasopressors is indicated for hypotensive patients. Intravenous fluids should be administered with caution as increased right ventricular load can disable the oxygen balance.[1]
  • If anticoagulation is contraindicated, then an IVC filter is recommended.

Step 3: Assess Treatment Response and Need for Device Based Therapy

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acute PE confirmed
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Anticoagulation contraindicated ?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Yes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
No
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
IVC filter
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Stratification
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Low-risk PE
 
 
 
Submassive PE
 
Massive PE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Anticoagulation
 
 
 
Anticoagulation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assess clinically for evidence of increased severity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Evidence of Shock (SBP <90 mmHg) or respiratory failure
 
Is Thrombolytic Contraindicated?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Yes
 
No
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Surgical emblectomy or catheter based interventions
 
Hold Anticoagulation, Give Thrombolytics then resume Anticoagulations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Patient shows clinical improvement
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
No
 
Yes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Surgical emblectomy or catheter based interventions
 
Continue anticoagulation

Acute Therapies

Anticoagulation

The most common cause of mortality in patients with a pulmonary embolism, is a recurrent PE occurring within a few hours of the initial event.[2] Anticoagulation prevents further clot formation and extension, therefore it should be started as early as possible. Anticoagulation does not disaggregate existing clot, but it does facilitate the action of the body's endogenous lytic system. Anticoagulation is the cornerstone of therapy in an acute pulmonary embolism.[2][3] After initial risk stratification. Certain conditions like pericardial tamponade and aortic dissection can mimic pulmonary embolism. The use of anticoagulants is contraindicated in these medical conditions. Proceed with caution if these conditions are high on the differential. Immediate treatment should be initiated based on the following guidelines: [4][5][6]

Thrombolysis

  • Unless previously contraindicated, thrombolysis is indicated in patients with a massive PE or those with a submassive PE who develop or are at risk of developing hypotension (SBP < 90 mmHg).
  • Administration of a fibrinolytic via a peripheral intravenous catheter is recommended.
  • FDA recommends a 100 mg dose of alteplase administered as a continuous infusion over 2 hours. This treatment is supported by AHA[5] and ACCP guidelines.[4]
  • Withhold anticoagulation during the 2 hours of fibrinolytic infusion.
  • The role of thrombolysis in a submassive PE is not established at this point.[7] Two ongoing trials are investigating the efficacy and safety of this approach.
  • No large clinical trial has demonstrated a mortality benefit of thrombolytic therapy. However, it helps by accelerating clot lysis, improving pulmonary perfusion, and improving right ventricular function.[8][9]

To read more about dosage, contraindications, and guidelines, click here.

Surgical Procedures

  • Catheter-assisted thrombus removal is recommended in patients with a massive PE who have contraindications to thrombolytic therapy or have failed thrombolysis.
  • Thrombectomy is also recommended for patients who are in severe shock that may cause the patient to die before thrombolysis takes effect (hours).
  • Pulmonary embolectomy is also recommended if a patient with the above conditions fails catheter-assisted embolectomy.

IVC Filter

  • An IVC filter is indicated for patients for whom anticoagulation is contraindicated.
  • Anticoagulation should be restarted once the contraindication is resolved.

Chronic Therapies

  • After treatment in the hospital, the patient should continue anticoagulation treatment for 3 months if the PE is provoked by surgery or a nonsurgical transient risk factor.
  • An abnormal D-dimer level at the end of the treatment course might signal the need for continued treatment with anticoagulation for a first time unprovoked pulmonary embolus.[10]
  • Long-term treatment is usually recommended with vitamin K antagonists like warfarin, unless contraindicated or some special circumstances.
  • The recommended therapeutic INR range for patients with PE is 2.0-3.0.
  • Continued warfarin administration needs close monitoring. The patient should have an appointment with the "anticoagulation clinic" before leaving the hospital.

Extended Anticoagulation

Extended Treatment means extending the anticoagulation therapy beyond the first 3 months. It is recommended in the following scenarios:

  • For a pulmonary embolism that is unprovoked. The patient's risk should be re-evaluated at 3 months to consider whether or not extended therapy is warranted.
  • Active cancer.
  • Recurrent venous thromboembolism.
  • Chronic thrombembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Salient Features:

  • For extended therapy, the continued need for anticoagulation and the risk-benefit ratio should be re-evaluated at periodic intervals (eg, annually).
  • Patients with recurrent thromboembolic disease, with or without anticoagulation, should be evaluated for possible thrombophilias.

Specific Circumstances

Newer Anticoagulants

  • Dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitor), Rivaroxaban (Factor Xa inhibitor), and other drugs in the same classes, provide an alternate option to warfarin/LMWH for treatment of PE.
  • Advantages include the availability of an oral formulation, no frequent monitoring requirement, a predictable effect profile, and few (known) drug interactions.
  • Disadvantages include the currently limited prospective trial data, the theoretical interaction with statins (as they are metabolized by the same CYP3A4 enzyme), and the risk of bleeding.

2008 ESC Guidelines Treatment High-risk Pulmonary Embolism (DO NOT EDIT)[6]

Class I
"1. Anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin should be initiated without delay in patients with high-risk PE. (Level of Evidence: A) "
"2. Systemic hypotension should be corrected to prevent progression of RV failure and death due to PE. (Level of Evidence: C)"
"3. Vasopressive drugs are recommended for hypotensive patients with PE. (Level of Evidence: C)"
"4. Oxygen should be administered in patients with hypoxaemia.(Level of Evidence: C)"
"5. Thrombolytic therapy should be used in patients with high-risk PE presenting with cardiogenic shock and/or persistent arterial hypotension.(Level of Evidence: A)"
"6. Surgical pulmonary embolectomy is a recommended therapeutic alternative in patients with high-risk PE in whom thrombolysis is absolutely contraindicated or has failed.(Level of Evidence: C)"
Class III
"1. Aggressive fluid challenge is not recommended. (Level of Evidence: B)"
Class IIa
"1. Dobutamine and dopamine may be used in patients with PE, low cardiac output and normal blood pressure. (Level of Evidence: B)"
Class IIb
"1.Catheter embolectomy or fragmentation of proximal pulmonary arterial clots may be considered as an alternative to surgical treatment in high-risk patients when thrombolysis is absolutely contraindicated or has failed. (Level of Evidence: C)"

2008 ESC Guidelines Treatment Non-high-risk Pulmonary Embolism (DO NOT EDIT)[6]

Class I
"1. Anticoagulation should be initiated without delay in patients with high or intermediate clinical probability of PE while diagnostic workup is still ongoing. (Level of Evidence: C)"
"2. Use of LMWH or fondaparinux is the recommended form of initial treatment for most patients with non-high-risk PE. (Level of Evidence: A) "
"3. In patients at high risk of bleeding and in those with severe renal dysfunction, unfractionated heparin with an aPTT target range of 1.5–2.5 times normal is a recommended form of initial treatment. (Level of Evidence: C) "
"4. Initial treatment with unfractionated heparin, LMWH or fondaparinux should be continued for at least 5 days and (Level of Evidence: A) may be replaced by vitamin K antagonists only after achieving target INR levels for at least 2 consecutive days (Level of Evidence: C)"
Class III
"1. Thrombolytic therapy should be not used in patients with low-risk PE (Level of Evidence: B) "
Class IIb
"1. Routine use of thrombolysis in non–high-risk PE patients is not recommended, but it may be considered in selected patients with intermediate-risk PE (Level of Evidence: B) "

ESC 2008 Guidelines Recommendations Long-term treatment (DO NOT EDIT)[6]

Class I
"1. For patients with PE secondary to a transient (reversible) risk factor, treatment with a VKA is recommended for 3 months.(Level of Evidence: A)"
"2. For patients with unprovoked PE, treatment with a VKA is recommended for at least 3 months. (Level of Evidence: A)"
"3. For patients with a second episode of unprovoked PE, long-term treatment is recommended. (Level of Evidence: A)"
"4. In patients who receive long-term anticoagulant treatment, the risk/benefit ratio of continuing such treatment should be reassessed at regular intervals. (Level of Evidence: C)"
"5. In patients with PE, the dose of VKA should be adjusted to maintain a target INR of 2.5 (range 2.0–3.0) regardless of treatment duration.(Level of Evidence: A)"
Class IIb
"1. Patients with a first episode of unprovoked PE and low risk of bleeding, and in whom stable anticoagulation can be achieved, may be considered for long-term oral anticoagulation. (Level of Evidence: B)"
Class IIa
"1. For patients with PE and cancer, LMWH should be considered for the first 3–6 months (Level of Evidence: B) after this period, anticoagulant therapy with VKA or LMWH should be continued indefinitely or until the cancer is considered cured.(Class I,Level of Evidence: C)"

References

  1. Mercat A, Diehl JL, Meyer G, Teboul JL, Sors H (1999). "Hemodynamic effects of fluid loading in acute massive pulmonary embolism". Crit. Care Med. 27 (3): 540–4. PMID 10199533. Retrieved 2011-12-12. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. 2.0 2.1 Carson JL, Kelley MA, Duff A, Weg JG, Fulkerson WJ, Palevsky HI, Schwartz JS, Thompson BT, Popovich J, Hobbins TE (1992). "The clinical course of pulmonary embolism". N. Engl. J. Med. 326 (19): 1240–5. doi:10.1056/NEJM199205073261902. PMID 1560799. Retrieved 2011-12-12. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  3. Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M (1999). "Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER)". Lancet. 353 (9162): 1386–9. PMID 10227218. Retrieved 2011-12-12. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ; et al. (2012). "Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines". Chest. 141 (2 Suppl): e419S–94S. doi:10.1378/chest.11-2301. PMID 22315268. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  5. 5.0 5.1 Jaff MR, McMurtry MS, Archer SL; et al. (2011). "Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association". Circulation. 123 (16): 1788–830. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e318214914f. PMID 21422387. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Torbicki A, Perrier A, Konstantinides S; et al. (2008). "Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)". Eur. Heart J. 29 (18): 2276–315. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn310. PMID 18757870. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  7. Dong B, Jirong Y, Liu G, Wang Q, Wu T. Thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(2):CD004437. PMID 16625603.
  8. Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Heusel G, Heinrich F, Kasper W (2002). "Heparin plus alteplase compared with heparin alone in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism". N. Engl. J. Med. 347 (15): 1143–50. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa021274. PMID 12374874. Retrieved 2011-12-13. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  9. Levine M, Hirsh J, Weitz J, Cruickshank M, Neemeh J, Turpie AG, Gent M (1990). "A randomized trial of a single bolus dosage regimen of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in patients with acute pulmonary embolism". Chest. 98 (6): 1473–9. PMID 2123152. Retrieved 2011-12-21. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  10. Palareti G, Cosmi B, Legnani C; et al. (2006). "D-dimer testing to determine the duration of anticoagulation therapy". N. Engl. J. Med. 355 (17): 1780–9. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa054444. PMID 17065639.
  11. Lee AY, Levine MN, Baker RI, Bowden C, Kakkar AK, Prins M, Rickles FR, Julian JA, Haley S, Kovacs MJ, Gent M (2003). "Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer". N Engl J Med. 349 (2): 146–53. PMID 12853587.

Template:WH Template:WS