SandboxAlonso

Revision as of 20:28, 2 June 2014 by Gerald Chi (talk | contribs) (/* Diabetic Foot Infection Adapted from Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2862-71.{{cite journal| author=Wukich DK, Armstrong DG, Attinger CE, Boulton AJ, Burns PR, Frykberg RG et al.| title=Inpatient management of diabetic foot disorders: a clinical guide. | ...)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diabetic foot Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Diabetic foot from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

SandboxAlonso On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of SandboxAlonso

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on SandboxAlonso

CDC on SandboxAlonso

SandboxAlonso in the news

Blogs on SandboxAlonso

Directions to Hospitals Treating Diabetic foot

Risk calculators and risk factors for SandboxAlonso



Diabetic Foot Infection Adapted from Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2862-71.[1] and Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(12):e132-73.[2]

  • Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is diagnosed clinically by the presence of at least two signs or symptoms of inflammation:
  • Local swelling or induration
  • Erythema
  • Local tenderness or pain
  • Local warmth
  • Purulent discharge (thick, opaque to white or sanguineous secretion)
  • DFI is classified based on its severity according to the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guideline or the PEDIS grade developed by International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF).
Clinical Manifestation PEDIS Grade IDSA Severity
No symptoms or signs of infection 1 Uninfected
Local infection involving only the skin and the subcutaneous tissue without involvement of deeper tissues and without signs of SIRS
  • If erythema, must be >0.5 cm to ≤2 cm around the ulcer.
  • Exclude other causes of an inflammatory response of the skin (eg, trauma, gout, acute Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy, fracture, thrombosis, venous stasis).
2 Mild
Local infection with erythema >2 cm or involving structures deeper than skin and subcutaneous tissues (eg, abscess, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, fasciitis) without signs of SIRS 3 Moderate
Local infection with the signs of SIRS, as manifested by ≥2 of the following:
  • Temperature >38 °C or <36 °C
  • Heart rate >90 beats/min
  • Respiratory rate >20 breaths/min or PaCO2 <32 mm Hg
  • White blood cell count >12,000 or <4,000 cells/μL or ≥10% immature (band) forms
4 Severe
  • Hospitalization is appropriate for the following conditions:
  • Severe (grade 4) infections
  • Moderate (grade 3) infections with complicating features
  • Severe peripheral arterial disease or limb ischemia
  • Lack of home support
  • Patients unable to comply with the required outpatient treatment regimen for psychological or social reasons
  • Patients not responding to outpatient treatment
  • Properly obtained specimens for culture prior to initiating empiric antibiotic therapy provide useful information for guiding antibiotic therapy, particularly in those with chronic or previously treated infections which are commonly caused by obligate anaerobic organisms.
  • Infected wounds should be cultured by obtaining tissue samples during any surgical procedure or by tissue biopsy or wound base curettage.
  • Bone cultures are optimal for detecting the pathogen in osteomyelitis, but blood cultures are only necessary for those with a severe (grade 4) infection.
  • Cultures may be unnecessary for mild infections in patients who have not recently received antibiotic therapy and who are at low risk for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection; these infections are predictably caused solely by staphylococci and streptococci.
  • Cultures may yield organisms that are commonly considered to be contaminants (eg, coagulase-negative staphylococci, corynebacteria), but these may be true pathogens in DFIs and are often resistant to the empiric antibiotics.
  • Conditions to request consultation from specialists:
  • Urgent surgical intervention should be sought for DFIs accompanied by gas in the deeper tissues, an abscess, or necrotizing fasciitis, and less urgent surgery for DFIs with substantial nonviable tissue or extensive bone or joint involvement.
  • Consult a vascular surgeon to consider revascularization if ischemia complicates a DFI.
  • Infectious diseases specialists should be consulted when cultures yield multiple or antibiotic-resistant organisms, the patient has substantial renal impairment, or the infection does not respond to appropriate medical or surgical therapy in a timely manner.
  • No adjunctive therapy has been proven to improve resolution of infection, but for selected diabetic foot wounds that are slow to heal, clinicians might consider using bioengineered skin equivalents, growth factors, granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, or negative pressure wound therapy.

Antibiotic Therapy

  • Clinically uninfected wounds should not be treated with antibiotic therapy. For all infected wounds, antibiotic therapy combined with appropriate wound care is recommended.
  • For clinically infected wounds, consider the questions below:
1. Is there high risk of MRSA?
  • Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus auerus (MRSA) coverage should be considered in the following conditions:
  • Prior history of MRSA infection
  • High local prevalence of MRSA colonization or infection
  • Clinically severe diabetic foot infection
2. Has patient received antibiotics in the past month?
  • If so, include agents active against gram-negative bacilli in regimen.
  • If not, agents targeted against just aerobic gram-positive cocci may be sufficient.
3. Are there risk factors for infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing organisms?
  • Anti-pseudomonal agent is usually unnecessary except for patients with risk factors:
  • Coverage of ESBL-producing gram-negative organisms should be considered in countries in which they are relatively common.
4. What is the infection severity status?
  • Selection of empiric antimicrobial regimen and the route of administration should be based on the severity of DFI and the likely etiologic agents.
  • Mild (grade 2) to moderate (grade 3) DFI without recent antibiotic treatment:
  • Highly bioavailable oral antibiotics against aerobic gram-positive cocci may be sufficient.
  • Topical therapy may be considered in selected mild superficial infections.
  • Severe (grade 4) DFI:
  • Broad-spectrum, parenteral antibiotics are recommended while culture results and susceptibility data are pending.
  • Switch to oral agents when the patient is systemically well and culture results are available.
5. What is the duration of antibiotic therapy?
  • Antibiotic is usually given 1–2 weeks for mild infections and 2–3 weeks for moderate to severe infections.
  • Therapy should be continued until resolution of infection but not through complete healing of the wound.

▸ Click on the following categories to expand treatment regimens.

    Mild

    High suspicion of MRSA

  ▸  Low suspicion of MRSA

    Moderate

  ▸  High suspicion of MRSA

  ▸  Low suspicion of MRSA

  ▸  High suspicion of P. aureuginosa

    Severe

  ▸  Broad-spectrum regimen

High suspicion of MRSA
Doxycycline
OR
TMP/SMZ
Low suspicion of MRSA
Preferred Regimen
Dicloxacillin 250 mg PO q6h
OR
Cephalexin 500mg PO q12h
OR
Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid 850/125 mg PO q12h
OR
Clindamycin 300-450 mg PO q6h
High suspicion of MRSA
Preferred Regimen
High suspicion of MRSA
Linezolid
OR
Daptomycin
OR
Vancomycin
Low suspicion of MRSA
Preferred Regimen
Levofloxacin'
OR
Moxifloxacin
OR
cefoxitin
OR
Ceftriaxone
OR
Tigecylin
OR
Imipenem-cilastatin
High suspicion of P. aureuginosa
Preferred Regimen
Piperacilin-tazobactam
'Broad-spectrum regimen
Preferred Regimen
Vancomycin
PLUS
Ceftazidime
OR
Cefepime
OR
Piperacillin-Tazobactam
OR
Aztreonam
OR
[[

References

  1. Wukich DK, Armstrong DG, Attinger CE, Boulton AJ, Burns PR, Frykberg RG; et al. (2013). "Inpatient management of diabetic foot disorders: a clinical guide". Diabetes Care. 36 (9): 2862–71. doi:10.2337/dc12-2712. PMC 3747877. PMID 23970716.
  2. Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Cornia PB, Pile JC, Peters EJ, Armstrong DG; et al. (2012). "2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections". Clin Infect Dis. 54 (12): e132–73. doi:10.1093/cid/cis346. PMID 22619242.