Mitral regurgitation echocardiography
Resident Survival Guide |
File:Critical Pathways.gif |
Mitral Regurgitation Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Mitral regurgitation echocardiography On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Mitral regurgitation echocardiography |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Mitral regurgitation echocardiography |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2]; Varun Kumar, M.B.B.S. [3]; Lakshmi Gopalakrishnan, M.B.B.S. [4]; Mohammed A. Sbeih, M.D.[5]
Overview
Transthoracic echocardiography should be performed in a patient with suspected mitral regurgitation to confirm the diagnosis and to establish the baseline severity of disease. It should then be performed to monitor the course of disease over time. Color doppler flow on the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) will reveal a jet of blood flowing from the left ventricle into the left atrium during ventricular systole. Echocardiographic features that suggest severe mitral regurgitation include systolic reversal of flow in the pulmonary veins and filling of the entire left atrial cavity by the regurgitant jet of MR.
Echocardiography
Transthoracic eschocardiogrpahy (TTE) is the diagnostic modality of choice to evaluate mitral regurgitation. TEE allows the evaluation of the following:[1]
- Left ventricle structure and function
- Right ventricle structure and function
- The structures of the mitral valve and the underlying etiology of mitral regurgitation
- Leaflet perforation
- Chordal rupture
- Rupture of the papillary muscle
- Valvular vegetations
- Pulmonary artery pressure
- The severity of the mitral regurgitation through he measurement of:
- The effective orifice area
- The regurgitant volume
- The regurgitant fraction
When TTE is non diagnostic in the setting of acute MR and there is a clinical suspicion of MR, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) must be performed particularly among myocardial infarction patients with acute hemodynamic deterioration in the context of a normally contracting left ventricle.[1]
Determination of the Underlying Cause of Mitral Regurgitation on Echocardiography
Mitral Valve Prolapse / Myxomatous Mitral Valve
- Mitral valve prolapse is now the most common cause of mitral regurgitation in the Western world. Echocardiography in MVP demonstrates thick and redundant leaflets and chordae. The echocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of MVP include:
- Movement of any part of either leaflet more than 2 mm behind the annular plane in parasternal long axis view and
- Movement of the point of co-aptation behind the annular plane in the apical 4 chamber view
- Over time, the poor tensile strength of the chordae leads to their progressive elongation and / or rupture. Ruptured chordae appear as flail segments.
Rheumatic Mitral Regurgitation
- Commissural fusion and thickening of the leaflets are visible and there is restricted movement of the leaflets
Annular Calcification
- Normally, the mitral annulus contracts some during systole, and mitral annular calcification makes the annulus more rigid and impairs its contraction.
- There is increased echogenicity on the LV side immediately adjacent to the attachment of the posterior mitral valve leaflet.
- The region of the annulus adjacent to the anterior mitral leaflet is rarely involved. The anterior region can be involved in elderly subjects and younger patients with chronic renal failure and hypertension.
Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation
- Ischemia can cause mitral regurgitation via regional left ventricular dysfunction due to abnormal contraction of the papillary muscle and / or the underlying left ventricular wall. Ischemic MR occurs during exertion while MR associated with myocardial infarction occurs at rest.
Papillary Muscle Rupture
- Most often this is a complication of myocardial infarction. If the entire papillary muscle is disconnected from the left ventricle, then severe MR results and the patient rarely survives. Partial rupture is more common and carries a more favorable prognosis.
Functional Mitral Regurgitation
Functional MR is due to dilation of the mitral valve apparatus as a result of LV dilatation and systolic dysfunction in the presence of a structurally normal mitral valve apparatus.
Echocardiographic Monitoring
Echocardiography is performed for follow up among asymptomatic patients with MR to assess the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and end-systolic dimension. The frequency of follow up with an echocardiogram among asymptomatic patients with MR and normal LVEF is as follows:[1]
- Mild MR: Every 3-5 years
- Moderate MR: Every 1-2 years
- Severe MR: Every 6-12 months (the frequency increases if the the LV dilatation increases)
Degree of mitral regurgitation | Regurgitant fraction | Regurgitant Orifice area |
---|---|---|
Mild mitral regurgitation | < 20 percent | |
Moderate mitral regurgitation | 20 - 40 percent | |
Moderate to severe mitral regurgitation | 40 - 60 percent | |
Severe mitral regurgitation | > 60 percent | > 0.3 cm2 |
Assessment of Severity of Mitral Regurgitation
- The degree of severity of mitral regurgitation can be quantified by the percentage of the left ventricular stroke volume that regurgitates into the left atrium (the regurgitant fraction).
- Methods that have been used to assess the regurgitant fraction in mitral regurgitation include:
- Echocardiography.
- Cardiac catheterization.
- Fast CT scan.
- Cardiac MRI.
- The echocardiographic technique to measure the regurgitant fraction is to determine the forward flow through the mitral valve (from the left atrium to the left ventricle) during ventricular diastole, and comparing it with the flow out of the left ventricle through the aortic valve in ventricular systole.
- This method assumes that the aortic valve does not suffer from aortic insufficiency. The regurgitant fraction would be described as:
Regurgitant fraction = { (Vmitral - Vaortic) ÷ Vmitral } x 100% where Vmitral and Vaortic are respectively the volumes of blood that flow forward through the mitral valve and aortic valve during a cardiac cycle.
- Another way to quantify the degree of mitral regurgitation is to determine the area of the regurgitant flow at the level of the valve. This is known as the regurgitant orifice area, and correlates with the size of the defect in the mitral valve.
- One particular echocardiographic technique used to measure the orifice area is measurement of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA). The flaw of using PISA to determine the mitral valve regurgitant orifice area is that it measures the flow at one moment in time in the cardiac cycle, which may not reflect the average performance of the regurgitant jet.
- If the left ventricular and left atrial sizes are normal on echocardiography, mitral regurgitation is not severe.
- Central jets indicate the presence of a fairly normal mitral valve and therefore the mitral regurgitation is not severe. Wide eccentric jets indicate that the regurgitation is severe.
- Echocardiographic findings must match the symptoms, if they do not, perform transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or cardiac catheterization. TTE can underestimate the magnitude of mitral regurgitation in patients with clinical signs of severe MR.
Colour Flow Mapping
- Size of flow recruitment is noted.
- Jet base width at the valve level.
- Intra atrial jet area if it is a central jet.
- Jet direction is usually away from a prolapsing leaflet and behind a restricted leaflet.
Continuous Wave Doppler
- Shape and density of signal - In severe Mitral regurgitation, the flow is dense and triangular.
- If as dense as forward flow, it is severe.
Pulse Wave Doppler(PW)
- PW in apical-4-chamber view.
- E wave more than 1.2m/s indicates severe MR.
- Even minor mitral stenosis or hyperdynamic circulation can increase E wave.
- If A-wave dominant, severe MR is virtually ruled out.
Vena Contracta
- vena contracta is the narrowest region of regurgitant jet (usually just below the valve in LA).
- >0.7 cm - severe MR.
Pulmonary Venous Flow
- Usually forward throughout cycle.
- Systolic dominant.
- As MR worsens, there is a blunting of systolic flow.
- If severe MR - systolic flow reversal.
Regurgitant Volume
- Mitral regurgitant volume = Mitral inflow volume - LV outflow volume.
- Mitral inflow volume = Vti * Cross sectional area of mitral valve.
- LV outflow volume = Vti * Cross sectional area at LV outflow.
- Regurtitant volume - <20% - mild , >50% severe
PISA (Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area)
The radius of Proximal isovelocity surface area or flow convergence zone which is a 3-dimensional surface area proximal to a narrowed orifice at which all the blood velocities are equal, can be used to calculate the severity of mitral regurgitation. The principle is that if the mitral regurgitation is mild, only the blood nearer to the valve orifice accelerates towards the atrium while in severe regurgitation, blood farther away from the valve moves back.
PISA radius
A simple method to determine severity of mitral regurgitation is to measure the PISA radius. Regurgitation is mild if radius is <0.4 cm and severe if >1 cm.
Regurgitant Flow (Instantaneous)
The instantaneous regurgitant flow can be calculated from the PISA radius and can be used to assess the severity of mitral regurgitation.
Regurgitant flow = 2π * r2 * Valiasing
Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA)
Effective regurgitant orifice area can be calculated using the instantaneous regurgitant flow. The formula can be derived from the following:
Valiasing * 2πr2 = Vmax * EROA
hence:
- EROA = PISA (2πr2) * Valiasing / Vmax
Mild = 0-20 cm2, moderate = 20 - 40 cm2, severe = >40 cm2
Regurgitant volume can be calculated from this.
- Regurgitant volume = Effective regurgitant orifice area * Vtime integrale
Diastolic Mitral Regurgitation Secondary to Severe Aortic Stenosis
{{#ev:youtube|wzYVcqVLspw}}
{{#ev:googlevideo|424719160215823743&hl=en}}
{{#ev:googlevideo|-1316686479831791521&hl=en}}
Severity (Summary)
Severity | mild | severe |
---|---|---|
Jet area | <4 cm2 | >8 cm2 |
Jet width | thin | >0.6 |
vena contracta | <0.3 | >0.7 |
PISA radius | <0.4 | >1 |
Pulmonary venous flow | systolic dominant | systolic flow reversal |
Mitral inflow | can be A wave dominant | E wave dominant >1.2m/s |
Continuous wave doppler | soft and parabolic | dense and triangular |
LV and LA | normal size | enlarged (in chronic MR) |
duration | can be short | holosystolic |
Regurgitant volume | <30 ml | >60 ml |
EROA | 0-20 cm2 | >40 cm2 |
Echocardiographic Examples of Mitral Regurgitation
Severe Mitral Regurgitation From Ring Dehiscence Pulmonary Vein Pulsed Wave Doppler
Severe Mitral Regurgitation Pulmonary Vein Pulsed Wave Doppler
Mitral Ring Dehiscence Post Repair With Severe Mitral Regurgitation {{#ev:googlevideo|7246533519972889950&hl=en}}
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary[1]
Recommendations for Chronic Primary Mitral Regurgitation
Class I |
"1. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is indicated for baseline evaluation of LV size and function, right ventricular (RV) function and left atrial size, pulmonary artery pressure, and mechanism and severity of primary MR (stages A to D) in any patient suspected of having chronic primary MR. (Level of Evidence: B) " |
"2. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is indicated to establish the anatomic basis for chronic primary MR (stages C and D) and to guide repair. (Level of Evidence: B " |
"3. TEE is indicated for evaluation of patients with chronic primary MR (stages B to D) in whom noninvasive imaging provides nondiagnostic information about severity of MR, mechanism of MR, and/or status of LV function. (Level of Evidence: C) " |
Recommendations for Chronic Secondary Mitral Regurgitation
Class I |
"1. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is useful to establish the etiology of chronic secondary MR (stages B to D) and the extent and location of wall motion abnormalities and to assess global LV function, severity of MR and magnitude of pulmonary hypertension. (Level of Evidence: C) " |
2008 and Incorporated 2006 ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease (DO NOT EDIT) [2]
Transthoracic Echocardiography Indications (DO NOT EDIT) [2]
Class I |
"1. Transthoracic echocardiography is indicated for baseline evaluation of LV size and function, RV and left atrial size, pulmonary artery pressure, and severity of MR in any patient suspected of having MR.(Level of Evidence: C) " |
"2. Transthoracic echocardiography is indicated for delineation of the mechanism of MR.(Level of Evidence: B) " |
"3. Transthoracic echocardiography is indicated for annual or semiannual surveillance of LV function (estimated by ejection fraction and end-systolic dimension) in asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe MR.(Level of Evidence: C) " |
"4. Transthoracic echocardiography is indicated in patients with MR to evaluate the mitral valve apparatus and LV function after a change in signs or symptoms.(Level of Evidence: C) " |
"5. Transthoracic echocardiography is indicated to evaluate LV size and function and MVhemodynamics in the initial evaluation after mitral valve replacement or mitral valve repair.(Level of Evidence: C) " |
Class III |
"1. Transthoracic echocardiography is not indicated for routine follow-up evaluation of asymptomatic patients with mild MR and normal LV size and systolic function.(Level of Evidence: C) " |
Class IIa |
"1. Exercise Doppler echocardiography is reasonable in asymptomatic patients with severe MR to assess exercise tolerance and the effects of exercise on pulmonary artery pressure and MR severity.(Level of Evidence: C) " |
Transesophageal Echocardiography Indications (DO NOT EDIT) [3]
Class I |
"1. Preoperative or intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography is indicated to establish the anatomic basis for severe MR in patients in whom surgery is recommended to assess feasibility of repair and to guide repair.(Level of Evidence: B) " |
"2. Transesophageal echocardiography is indicated for evaluation of MR patients in whom [[transthoracic echocardiography] provides nondiagnostic information regarding severity of MR, mechanism of MR, and/or status of LV function.(Level of Evidence: B) " |
Class III |
"1. Transesophageal echocardiography is not indicated for routine follow-up or surveillance of asymptomatic patients with native valve [[MR].(Level of Evidence: C) " |
Class IIa |
"1. Preoperative transesophageal echocardiography is reasonable in asymptomatic patients with severe MR who are considered for surgery to assess feasibility of repair.(Level of Evidence: C) " |
Sources
- 2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease [2]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Guyton RA; et al. (2014). "2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines". Circulation. 129 (23): 2440–92. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000029. PMID 24589852.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K; et al. (2008). "2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons". Circulation. 118 (15): e523–661. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.190748. PMID 18820172. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC, Faxon DP, Freed MD; et al. (2008). "2008 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease). Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons". J Am Coll Cardiol. 52 (13): e1–142. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.007. PMID 18848134.