Tularemia laboratory findings

Revision as of 15:03, 28 March 2016 by Ilan Dock (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tularemia Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Tularemia from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Other Diagnostic Findings

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Prevention

Case Studies

Case #1

Tularemia laboratory findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Tularemia laboratory findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Tularemia laboratory findings

CDC on Tularemia laboratory findings

Tularemia laboratory findings in the news

Blogs on Tularemia laboratory findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Tularemia

Risk calculators and risk factors for Tularemia laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

There are a variety of lab diagnostic tests used to diagnose tularemia including Gram stains, bacteria cultures, biochemical,and antibody fluorescence tests. Gram stains and bacteria cultures are useful in identifying F.tularensis. Unfortunately, these diagnostics offer difficult interpretations with extensive procedures. Antibody fluorescence allows for quick and effective testing. This method is extraordinarily important in diagnosing pneumonic variations of tularemia, as these variations are often associated with a higher mortality rate.

Laboratory Findings

Stains and smears

Gram stain

  • Staining of F. tularensis often reveals the presence of tiny, 0.2-0.5-μm X 0.7-1.0 μm, pleomorphic, poorly staining, gram-negative coccobacilli seen mostly as single cells.
  • The Gram stain interpretation may be difficult because the cells are minute and faintly staining.
  • F. tularensis cells are smaller than Haemophilus influenzae.
  • Bipolar staining is not a distinctive feature of F. tularensis cells.
  • Additional work: Another smear may be prepared for referral to your state public health laboratory. [1]

Cultures

  • Established inoculation and plating procedures are used. For tissues, established laboratory procedure is used to inoculate media (e.g., grind, touch-preparation, or a sterile wood stick). Plates are taped shut in 2 places to prevent inadvertent opening (alternate to taping is acceptable).
  • Incubation of cultures.
    • Temperature: 35-37°C
    • Atmosphere: Ambient, use of 5% CO2 is acceptable.
    • Length of incubation: primary plates are held for 5 days. If it is known that if a patient has been treated with bacteriostatic antibiotics, then plates are held for up to 7 days to allow bacteria recovery time.
  • F. tularensis grows in commercial blood culture media.
  • These organisms require cysteine supplementation; therefore, F. tularensis may at first grow on SBA, but upon subsequent passage will fail to grow on standard SBA. *On cysteine supplemented agar plates, it is a gray-white, opaque colony, usually too small to be seen at 24 h on most general media such as CA, TM, and BCYE.
  • After incubation for 48 h or more, colonies are about 1-2 mm in diameter, white to grey to bluish-grey, opaque, flat, with an entire edge, smooth, and have a shiny surface.
  • F. tularensis will not grow on MacConkey or Eosin methylene blue agar plates. [1]
F. tularensis SCHU stain on 6% sheep blood agar (SBA), 72 h. Note its inability to grow well on SBA.
F. tularensis SCHU stain on chocolate agar, 72 h

Biochemical reactions/tests

  • Procedure: Use established laboratory procedures for catalase, oxidase,beta-lactamase, XV (or satellite), and urease tests.
  • Interpretation: According to established laboratory practice.
  • Additional notes: Commercial biochemical identification systems are not recommended at this stage. [1]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Protocol for the Presumptive Identification of Francisella tularensis. https://www.ok.gov/health2/documents/Francisella_tularensis%202-15-13.pdf Accessed March 8, 2016.

Template:WH Template:WS