ICD less than 9 months from diagnosis of nonischemic cardiomyopathy
ICD Guidelines Microchapters |
Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities |
Expert Consensus on the Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Patients Who Are Not Included or Not Well Represented in Clinical Trials |
ICD Implantation in the Context of an Abnormal Troponin that is Not Due to a Myocardial Infarction |
ICD Implantation Less Than 9 Months From The Initial Diagnosis of Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Dima Nimri, M.D. [2]
ICD IMPLANTATION <9 MONTHS FROM THE INITIAL DIAGNOSIS OF NONISCHEMIC CARDIOMYOPATHY
Recommended |
"1.In patients <9 months from the initial diagnosis of NICM who require nonelective permanent pacing, who would meet primary prevention criteria for implanta- tion of an ICD, and recovery of left ventricular function is uncertain or not expected, implantation of an ICD with the appropriately selected pacing abilities is recommended." |
"2. In patients <9 months from the initial diagnosis of NICM with sustained (or hemodynamically significant) ventricular tachyarrhythmia, implantation of an ICD is recommended." |
Can be Useful |
"1. If recovery of left ventricular function is unlikely, implantation of an ICD for primary prevention can be useful between 3 and 9 months after initial diagnosis of NICM." |
"2.In patients <9 months from the initial diagnosis of NICM with syncope that is thought to be due to a ven- tricular tachyarrhythmia (by clinical history or docu- mented NSVT), implantation of an ICD can be useful." |
"3. In patients <9 months from the initial diagnosis of NICM who have been listed for heart transplant or implanted with a left ventricular assist device, implantation of an ICD can be useful." |
Not Recommended |
"1. Implantation of an ICD for primary prevention is not recommended within the first 3 months after initial diagnosis of NICM." |