Secondary peritonitis echocardiography or ultrasound

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Peritonitis main page

Secondary Peritonitis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Secondary peritonitis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History & Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Secondary peritonitis echocardiography or ultrasound On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Secondary peritonitis echocardiography or ultrasound

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Secondary peritonitis echocardiography or ultrasound

CDC on Secondary peritonitis echocardiography or ultrasound

Secondary peritonitis echocardiography or ultrasound in the news

Blogs on Secondary peritonitis echocardiography or ultrasound

Directions to Hospitals Treating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Secondary peritonitis echocardiography or ultrasound

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shivani Chaparala M.B.B.S [2]

Overview

Ultrasound may be positive in unto 72%. US is recommended as a screening test for acute abdomen and strongly recommended particularly when AAA rupture or acute cholecystitis is suspected. US is recommended in pregnant women, young women, or children in whom radioactive exposure is not desirable.

Key Ultrasound Findings in Secondary peritonitis

  • Abdominal ultrasonography may be helpful in the evaluation of pathology in the right upper quadrant (eg, perihepatic abscess, cholecystitis, pancreatitis, pancreatic pseudocyst), right lower quadrant, and pelvis (eg, appendicitis, tubo-ovarian abscess, Douglas pouch abscess).
  • However, the examination is sometimes limited because of patient discomfort, abdominal distention, and bowel gas interference.
  • Ultrasonography may detect increased amounts of peritoneal fluid (ascites), but its ability to detect quantities of less than 100 mL is limited.
  • A diagnostic accuracy of greater than 85% has been reported in several series.
  • Ultrasonographically guided aspiration and placement of drains has evolved into a valuable tool in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal fluid collections.
  • Advantages of ultrasound include low cost, portability, and availability.
  • Disadvantages are that the test is operator dependent, and there is reduced visualization in the presence of overlying bowel gas and abdominal dressings.

Ultrasound Examples of Secondary peritonitis

References