Lower gastrointestinal bleeding other diagnostic studies
Lower gastrointestinal bleeding Microchapters |
Differentiating Lower gastrointestinal bleeding from other Diseases |
---|
Diagnosis |
Treatment |
Management |
Surgery |
Case Studies |
Lower gastrointestinal bleeding other diagnostic studies On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Lower gastrointestinal bleeding other diagnostic studies |
FDA on Lower gastrointestinal bleeding other diagnostic studies |
CDC on Lower gastrointestinal bleeding other diagnostic studies |
Lower gastrointestinal bleeding other diagnostic studies in the news |
Blogs on Lower gastrointestinal bleeding other diagnostic studies |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Lower gastrointestinal bleeding other diagnostic studies |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Ganti M.B.B.S. [2]
Overview
Nasogastric tube lavage may be helpful in the diagnosis of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. NGT helps in differentiating LGIB from UGIB.
Other Imaging Findings
Nasogastric lavage
- Nasogastric lavage is only indicated when the diagnosis of UGIB doubtful.[1][2]
- It is rarely used.
- Nasogastric lavage also helps in documenting active or recent UGIB and the need for urgent endoscopy.
- Occasionally used to empty gastric contents in preparation for endoscopy.
Interpretation
- Evidence of old (brown colored or 'coffee grounds') or fresh blood documents presence of UGIB.
- Evidence of bilious material rules out bleeding distal to the pylorus.
- Any other appearances of GI contents are non-diagnostic.
- There is no evidence that performing a nasogastric lavage to clear clots or otherwise manage bleeding improves clinical outcome.
- Determining whether blood is in gastric contents, either vomited or aspirated specimens, is surprisingly difficult.
- Slide tests are based on orthotolidine (Hematest reagent tablets and Bili-Labstix) or guaiac (Hemoccult and Gastroccult).
- Rosenthal found orthotolidine-based tests more sensitive than specific; the Hemoccult test's sensitivity reduced by the acidic environment; and the Gastroccult test be the most accurate[3]. Cuellar found the following results:
Finding | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value (prevalence of 39%) |
Negative predictive value (prevalence of 39%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gastroccult | 95% | 82% | 77% | 96% |
Physician assessment | 79% | 55% | 53% | 20% |
- Holman used simulated gastric specimens and found the Hemoccult test to have significant problems with non-specificy and false-positive results, whereas the Gastroccult test was very accurate[5].
Contraindications
- Avoid gastric lavage in patients with suspected perforated abdominal viscus.
Complicatiions
Complications of the procedure include:
- Bleeding from trauma during tube passage in patients with coagulopathy is a possible complication.
- Other rare complications include
- Pharyngeal and esophageal perforation
- Cardiac arrest
- Ethmoid sinus fracture with brain trauma
- Bronchial intubation.
References
- ↑ Pallin DJ, Saltzman JR (2011). "Is nasogastric tube lavage in patients with acute upper GI bleeding indicated or antiquated?". Gastrointest. Endosc. 74 (5): 981–4. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.007. PMID 22032314.
- ↑ Marshall JB (1982). "Management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding". Postgrad Med. 71 (5): 149–54, 157–8. PMID 6978482.