Multiple myeloma screening

Revision as of 05:37, 15 July 2018 by Shyam Patel (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Multiple myeloma Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Multiple Myeloma from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

Staging

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

Echocardiograph and Ultrasound

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Multiple myeloma screening On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Multiple myeloma screening

All Images
X-rays
Echo and Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Multiple myeloma screening

CDC on Multiple myeloma screening

Multiple myeloma screening in the news

Blogs on Multiple myeloma screening

Directions to Hospitals Treating Multiple myeloma

Risk calculators and risk factors for Multiple myeloma screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Haytham Allaham, M.D. [2]

Overview

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for multiple myeloma.[1][2]

Screening

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, or (MGUS), carries a 1% per year risk of progression to active multiple myeloma. Given the risk of progression, patients should be screened via monitoring of complete blood count and serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) typically once yearly. The frequency of screening may vary depending on the MGUS risk group. High-risk patients may need more frequent monitoring.

Smoldering multiple myeloma

Smoldering multiple myeloma carries a 10% per year risk of progression to active multiple myeloma. Given the risk of progression, patients should be screened via monitoring of complete blood count and serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) typically once yearly. The frequency of screening may vary depending on the smoldering multiple myeloma risk group. High-risk smoldering multiple myeloma patients may need more frequent monitoring.

Multiple myeloma

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for active multiple myeloma.[1][2]

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources