Distal humerus fracture

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Distal humerus fracture
ICD-10 S42.2-S42.4
ICD-9 812
eMedicine emerg/199  orthoped/271 orthoped/199

WikiDoc Resources for Distal humerus fracture

Articles

Most recent articles on Distal humerus fracture

Most cited articles on Distal humerus fracture

Review articles on Distal humerus fracture

Articles on Distal humerus fracture in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ

Media

Powerpoint slides on Distal humerus fracture

Images of Distal humerus fracture

Photos of Distal humerus fracture

Podcasts & MP3s on Distal humerus fracture

Videos on Distal humerus fracture

Evidence Based Medicine

Cochrane Collaboration on Distal humerus fracture

Bandolier on Distal humerus fracture

TRIP on Distal humerus fracture

Clinical Trials

Ongoing Trials on Distal humerus fracture at Clinical Trials.gov

Trial results on Distal humerus fracture

Clinical Trials on Distal humerus fracture at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Distal humerus fracture

NICE Guidance on Distal humerus fracture

NHS PRODIGY Guidance

FDA on Distal humerus fracture

CDC on Distal humerus fracture

Books

Books on Distal humerus fracture

News

Distal humerus fracture in the news

Be alerted to news on Distal humerus fracture

News trends on Distal humerus fracture

Commentary

Blogs on Distal humerus fracture

Definitions

Definitions of Distal humerus fracture

Patient Resources / Community

Patient resources on Distal humerus fracture

Discussion groups on Distal humerus fracture

Patient Handouts on Distal humerus fracture

Directions to Hospitals Treating Distal humerus fracture

Risk calculators and risk factors for Distal humerus fracture

Healthcare Provider Resources

Symptoms of Distal humerus fracture

Causes & Risk Factors for Distal humerus fracture

Diagnostic studies for Distal humerus fracture

Treatment of Distal humerus fracture

Continuing Medical Education (CME)

CME Programs on Distal humerus fracture

International

Distal humerus fracture en Espanol

Distal humerus fracture en Francais

Business

Distal humerus fracture in the Marketplace

Patents on Distal humerus fracture

Experimental / Informatics

List of terms related to Distal humerus fracture

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohammadmain Rezazadehsaatlou[2].

Overview

The injuries of the ball-and-socket shoulder joint considered as the Distal humerus fracture. It is more common among the elderly population following a low energy trauma such as falling. Meanwhile, A few people experience the axillary nerve damage such as reduced sensation around the middle deltoid and/or axillary artery involvement.

Historical Perspective

There are no reliable information regarding the historical perspective of the hip bone fracture.

Causes

The main etiology of the Distal humerus fracture is thought to be an axial loading may be placed on a hyperpronated forearm during falling onto an outstretched hand (FOOSH) with an extended wrist and hyperpronated forearm and shoulder. Because at this posture the energy from the radius fracture transmitted towards the shoulder joint cause the fracture and/or dislocation of the humerus bone.

Pathophysiology

Mechanism

The Distal humerus fracture is caused by a fall on the outstretched hands. The form and severity of this fracture depends on the position of the shoulder joint at the moment of hitting the ground. The width of this mentioned angle affects the localization of the fracture. Pronation, supination and abduction positions leads the direction of the force and the compression of carpus and different appearances of injury.

Pathophysiology

Its known that the Distal humerus fracture in normal healthy adults can be caused due to the high-energy trauma (e.g., motor vehicle accidents), sport related injuries, falling from height. But it should be noted that the most important Risk factors for insufficiency fractures is chronic metabolic disease such as steoporosis, osteopenia, eating-disordered behavior, higher age, prolonged corticosteroid usage, female gender, lower BMI, history of a recent falling, and prior fracture.

  • The pattern of bone fracture and severity of injury depends on variety of factors such as:
    • Patients age
    • Patients Weight
    • Patients past medical history specifically any bone diseases affecting the quality of bone (such as osteoporosis, malignancies)
    • Energy of trauma
    • Bone quality
    • Position of the specific organ during the trauma
  • The below-mentioned processes cause decreased bone mass density:

Differentiating Distal humerus fracture from other Diseases

In the orthopedic medicine its important to know that the forearm fracture should be evaluated using radiography for both confirming diagnosis and also for evaluating the surrounding tissues. Other injuries such as possible shoulder fracture-dislocation; radial head or coronoid fractures or lateral collateral ligament injury. If the mechanism of injury suggests particularly low energy then the Osteoporosis should be considered. The pathological Fractures occurring in a bone with a tumor or Paget's disease) are rare but possible[3].

Also it should be noted that the both bone fractures can be complicated by acute compartment syndrome of the forearm. Signs suggesting compartment syndrome are pain on extension of digits, and marked edema[3].

As another important fact in orthopedic fracture is if both-bone fractures were found in pediatric which is common after accidental trauma, but it may also be the due to the of child abuse; and in these cases a careful attention and evaluation should be considered if a child abuse is suspected Differential Diagnoses for the Distal humerus fracture:

  • Shoulder Dislocation
  • Elbow Fracture
  • Clavicle Fracture
  • Scapular Fracture

Epidemiology and Demographics

The elbow joint fractures count for 4.3% of all fractures. Meanwhile, the distal humerus fractures account for 2% of all fractures. Also, it count as 30% the elbow fracture. both medial and lateral columns are usually involved in distal humerus fractures.

Risk Factors

There are different risk factors that presidpose patient for the Distal humerus fracture that include:

  • High-risk contact sports
  • Higher age (elderly adults are higher prone to such fractures)
  • Reduced bone density (osteoporosis)
  • Direct blow
  • Road / traffic accidents
  • Falling on an outstretched hand with the forearm pronated
  • Direct trauma to the arm/forearm
  • Taking part in any rough or high-impact sport
  • Street fights, gunshot wounds, and domestic violence, may also cause the Humerus fracture
  • Road traffic accidents.

Classification

The distal humerus fracture may be classified based on the exact location of fracture:

  • Distal third of humerus
  • Intercodylar (Intra articular)
  • Supracondylar (High and low supracondylar; flexion and extension)
AO/OTA Classification of Distal Humeral Fractures
Type A Extra-articular
AO/OTA Classification of Distal Humeral Fractures
Type B Intraarticular- Single Column
Type C Intraarticular- Both Columns
Jupiter and Mehne Classification of Distal Humeral Fractures
Grade I Intra-articular Single  column:

1. Low medial

2. High medial

3. Low lateral

4. High lateral

5. Capitellum

6. Trochlea

Grade I Intra-articular (single column)
Bi - column:

1. High T intercondylar

2. Low T intercondylar

3. Y intercondylar

4. H intercondylar

5. Lambda pattern (lateral)

6. Lambda pattern (medial)

Grade I Intra-articular (Bi-column)
Grade II Extra-articular - intracapsular 1. High transcolumn 1a. extension, 1b. flexion

2. Low transcolumn 2a extension, 2b flexion

3. Abduction

4. Adduction

Grade II Extra-articular - intracapsular
Grade III Extra-capsular 1. Medial epicondyle

2. Lateral epicondyle

Grade III Extra-articular - intracapsular
Riseborough and Radin classification of intercondylar fractures in cases with the Distal humerus fracture
Type I no displacement of the fragments
Intercondylar fractures of the humerus: Riseborough and Radin classification.
Type II T-shaped intercondylar fractures + the trochlea and capitellum fragments separated but not appreciably rotated in the frontal plane
Type III T-shaped intercondylar fractures + separation of the fragments and significant rotatory deformity
Type IV T-shaped intercondylar fractures + severe comminution of the articular surface arid wide separation of the humeral condyles
The Gartland classification of supracondylar fractures of the humerus
Type I no displacement or minimally displaced
  • Ia: undisplaced in both projections
  • Ib: minimal displacement, medial cortical buckle, capitellum remains intersected by anterior humeral line
Supracondylar fracture: Gartland classification
Type II displaced but with intact cortex
  • IIa: posterior angulation with intact posterior cortex; anterior humeral line does not intersect capitellum
  • IIb: rotatory or straight displacement but fracture remains in contact
Type III completely displaced
  • IIIa: complete posterior displacement with no cortical contact
  • IIIb: complete displacement with soft tissue gap (i.e. bone ends held apart by interposed soft tissues)


Screening

Osteoporosis is an important risk factor for human affecting human bone especially in men with the age of older than 50 years old and postmenopausal and women.

Based on the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) there are three groups of patients need to be screened for the osteoporosis:

  • ·       Men with no history of osteoporosis
  • ·       Women with the age of 65≤ year old, with no previous history of pathological fracture due to the osteoporosis
  • ·       Women with the age of <65 years, with 10-year fracture risk of not less than a 65-year-old white woman (who has not any other risk factor)

Accordingly women older than age of 50 are the main target for the osteoporosis screening. There is no specific recommendation to screen men for the osteoporosis.[1]

The USPSTF recommendations from 2002 included:

Meanwhile, there are two major modalities for the osteoporosis screening:

  1. ·       Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the hip and lumbar spine bones
  2. ·       Quantitative ultrasonography of the calcaneus

*It should be noted of the two above mentioned modalities for screening the ultrasonograhy is preferred to the DXA due to its lower cost, lower ionizing radiation, more availability.

After the primary evaluation of the osteoporosis, the further evaluation are required in some cases such as:

·       Women with normal bone density or mild osteopenia: T-score of greater than −1.50 – should have screening for 15 years.

·       Women with moderate osteopenia: T-score of −1.50 to −1.99 – should have screening for 5 years.

·       Women with advanced osteopenia: T-score of −2.00 to −2.49 - should have screening for 1 year.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Natural History

In cases with untreated Distal humerus fracture the malunion and deformity of arm can be occurred.

Complications

The overall complication rate in the treatment of Humerus fracture were found in around 40% of cases:

  1. Neurovascular compromise: such as Ulna nerve damage
  2. Compartment syndrome
  3. Chronic disability of the DRUJ
  4. Physeal Injury
  5. Malunion of the radius
  6. Nonunion
  7. Infection
  8. Refracture following plate removal
  9. Posterior interosseois nerve (PIN) injury.
  10. Instability of the DRUJ
  11. Loss of Motion (Stiffness)
  12. Posttraumatic Arthritis
  13. Heterotopic Ossification

Prognosis

Successful treatment of Distal humerus fracture depends on the on-time interventions such as: reduction of the radius and DRUJ and the restoration of the forearm axis. The incidence of nonunion of Humerus fracture is very low. On the other hand, the rate of successful union following the open reduction of forearm fractures was reported around 98%. Previous researches showed that the loss of strength at the supination and pronation were found in 12.5% and 27.2%, respectively.

Diagnosis

The diagnosis of a Distal humerus fracture should be confirmed using a radiographic examination.

History and Symptoms

The related signs and symptoms include:

  • Skin lacerations
  • Weak pulse
  • Open fractures
  • Bruising
  • Swelling
  • Stiffness
  • Inability to move
  • Pain in touch
  • Loss of function of the forearm
  • Difficulties in detection of pulses
  • Radial nerve damage

In the physical exam the orthopedic surgeon should check the vascular status and amount of swelling in the forearm. In MULTI-trauma patients or in comatose or obtunded patients a tense compartment with neurological signs or stretch pain should be considered as the compartment syndrome, and the compartment pressures should be measured and monitored. Normally the pain and soft-tissue swelling are found at the injury site (distal-third radial fracture site and at the wrist joint). This injury should be confirmed using a radiographic evaluations. Also, patients may loss the pinch mechanism between their thumb and their index finger which can be due to the paralysis of the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) and flexor digitorum profundus (FDP).

Physical Examination

The related signs and symptoms include:

  • Edema of the shoulder
    • Most of the time the edema will be a non-pitting edema
    • Depends on the edema extent, it may even lead to compartment syndrome in the anterior and internal compartment of shoulder
  • Bruising
    • As a manifestation of internal injury to the local vessels by trauma or fractures bone
  • Decrease in range of motion
    • Movement of the fractures limb will be painful if possible at all
  • Tenderness
  • Deformity
    • Fractured bone deformity may be touchable in the internal side of the forearm if the fracture is displaced

In the physical exam the orthopedic surgeon should check the vascular status and amount of swelling in the forearm. In polytrauma patients or in comatose or obtunded patients a tense compartment with neurological signs or stretch pain should be considered as the compartment syndrome, and the compartment pressures should be measured and monitored.

Physical examination of patients with Distal humerus fracture is usually remarkable for swelling, tenderness, bruises, ecchymosis, deformity and restricted range of motion of the wrist.

Appearance of the Patient

  • Patients with Distal humerus fracture usually appears normal unless the patients had a high energy trauma causing the open wound fracture.

Vital Signs

Skin

HEENT

Neck

Lungs

Heart

Abdomen

Back

Genitourinary

Neuromuscular

  • Neuromuscular examination of patients with Distal humerus fracture is usually normal
  • However, some patients may develop neuropraxia of the branch of the Ulnar nerve resulting in decreased sensation of thumb, index and middle finger.

Laboratory Findings

There is a limited laboratory tests useful in the diagnosis of bone fractures such as the Distal humerus fracture. Meanwhile, aged men and women may have some abnormalities in their laboratory findings suggestive of osteoporosis.

Laboratory tests for the diagnosis of osteoporosis are:

  • Complete blood count (CBC)
  • Serum total calcium level
  • Serum Ionized calcium level
  • Serum phosphate level
  • Serum alkaline phosphatase level
  • Serum 25-(OH)-vitamin D level

X Ray

The orthopedic surgeon should consider to have at least two radiographic projections (ie, anteroposterior [AP] and lateral) of the forearm. These show the fracture, the extent of displacement, and the extent of comminution. The orthopedic surgeon should pay serious attention toward finding any foreign bodies in open fractures and gunshot injuries. Also imperative is to include the elbow and wrist joint in the radiographs of Humerus fracture to ensure that the distal radioulnar joint injuries are not missed.

CT

  • CT-scan in the case of the Humerus fractureis the best modality if you can not have an exclusive diagnosis by X-ray itself can not be made.

MRI

  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an expensive technique that should not be used routinely.
  • MRI is a powerful diagnostic tool to assess the abnormalities of the bone, ligaments and soft tissues associated with the Distal humerus fracture, but it is known as a limited utility in radioulnar injuries and is not indicated in uncomplicated forearm fractures.
  • Meanwhile, the MRI can be useful in in following mentioned evaluations:
  • Evaluation of occult fractures
  • Evaluation of the post-traumatic or avascular necrosis of carpal bones
  • Evaluation of tendons
  • Evaluation of nerve
  • Evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome

Other Imaging Findings

There are no other imaging findings associated with Distal humerus fracture

Other Diagnostic Studies

There are no other Diagnostic studies associated with Distal humerus fracture

Treatment

Immediate stabilization of patients is the first step. Then the radial fracture and the DRUJ stabilization is recommended in these cases. Open forearm fractures considered as a surgical emergency. Humerus fracture occurs in younger patients who are skeletally immature; the normally they treated using a closed reduction and casting. Since closed reduction and cast application have led to unsatisfactory results. Then, Almost always the open reduction are necessary for the Humerus fracture. There are controversies regarding the indications for intramedullary nailing of forearm fractures.

Non-Operative Treatmen

  • The first step in managing a patient with a fracture is to stabilize the patient if he/she is unstable due to blood loss, etc by giving them intravenous fluids and giving them some painkillers if the pain is severe.
  • In children, the usual plan is to attempt closed reduction followed by cast immobilization. In adults, treatment with immobilization in a molded long arm cast can be used in those rare occasions of a non-displaced fracture of both bones of the forearm. If the fracture shifts in position, it may require surgery to put the bones back together.
  • Rigid immobilization is suggested in preference to removable splints in nonoperative treatment for the management of the Distal humerus fracture
  • For all patients with Humerus fracture, a post-reduction true lateral radiograph is suggested .
  • Operative fixation is suggested in preference to cast fixation for fractures with post-reduction radial shortening greater than 3 mm, dorsal tilt greater than 10º, or intra-articular displacement or step-off greater than 2 mm.
  • Patients probably do not need to begin early wrist motion routinely after stable fracture fixation.
  • Adjuvant treatment of Distal humerus fracture with vitamin C is suggested for the prevention of disproportionate pain
  • The medial epicondylar fractures should be immobilized for 7 days with patients elbow flexed at 90º, with the pronated forearm , and the flexed wrist at 30º for relaxing the common flexor-pronator muscle group. If more than 3 mm of displacement is present or the fragment is trapped in the medial joint, attempts at closed reduction often fail, and ORIF is necessary.
  • Lateral epicondylar fractures should be immobilized for 7 days with patients elbow flexed at 90º, with the supinated forearm , and the extended wrist for relaxing the extensor muscles.

Complications of Non-surgical therapy

Failure of non-surgical therapy is common:

  • Re-displacement to its original position even in a cast
  • Stiffness
  • Post traumatic osteoarthritis leading to wrist pain and loss of function
  • Other risks specific to cast treatment include:

Surgery

Returning to the normal physical activity after Distal humerus fracturecan take weeks to months of therapy under supervision an orthopedist. Meanwhile, a physiotherapy can be helpful for patient to achieve the normal wrist and elbow function caused by the immobilisation. All adult Distal humerus fracture should be considered to be treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

External fixation: For severe open fractures Open reduction and internal fixation: For distal humerus fractures which depending on each patients condition the following may be needed:

Ulnar nerve placement Bone grafting Osteotomy Arthrodesis


Operation

  • There are a variety of methods and implants useful to stabilize the Distal humerus fracture, ranging from closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation to the use of intra-medullary devices.
  • However, the most common fixation methods to treat complex Distal humerus fracture include external fixation, and open reduction and internal fixation.

External Fixation With or Without Percutaneous Pin Fixation

  • Wrist spanning external fixation employs ligamentotaxis to restore and maintain length, alignment, and rotation of ulnar bone.
  • Reduction is typically obtained through closed or minimally open methods and preserves the fracture biology.
  • The addition of percutaneous pins enhances the ability to reduce and stabilize fracture fragments.

Complications of External Fixation

Open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws

  • This is the most common type of surgical repair for Distal humerusfracture
  • During this type of procedure, the bone fragments are first repositioned (reduced) into their normal alignment.
  • The bones held together with special screws and metal plates attached to the outer surface of the bone.


Complications of open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws =

  • Infection
  • Damage to nerves and blood vessels
  • Synostosis
  • Nonunion

Pain Management

Pain after an injury or surgery is a natural part of the healing process.

Medications are often prescribed for short-term pain relief after surgery or an injurysuch as:

  • opioids
  • non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
  • local anesthetics

Be aware that although opioids help relieve pain after surgery or an injury, they are a narcotic and can be addictive.  It is important to use opioids only as directed by doctor.

Interventions

The following options can be helpful for patients to rehabilitate after their fracture :

  • Joints mobilization
  • compression bandage
  • Soft tissue massage
  • Exercises and Activity modification
  • Forearm taping
  • Forearm bracing

Postoperative Rehabilitation

  • Complex Humerus fracture warrant individualized immobilization and rehabilitation strategies.
  • Similarly, the addition of a thumb spica cast or orthosis with positioning of the wrist in slight ulnar deviation for management of a comminuted radial column fracture may prevent loss of reduction. *Because most multifragmentary Humerus fracture are the result of high-energy injuries, a prolonged period of wrist immobilization and soft-tissue rest may be beneficial and has not been shown to affect clinical outcomes.
  • The wrist is typically immobilized for 2 weeks post-operatively in a sugar tong splint with neutral forearm rotation.
  • At 6 weeks post-operatively, the wrist is placed into a removable orthosis, and active and passive range of motion (ROM) is initiated.
  • Full weight bearing commences at approximately 3 months post-operatively after consolidation of the fracture is noted on radiographs.
  • The presence of varying degrees of hand, wrist, and elbow stiffness is inevitable and may result from poor pain control, lack of effort in controlled mobilization, edema, concomitant ipsilateral upper extremity fractures, or peripheral nerve injuries.
  • Early stretching and mobilization of the intrinsic and extrinsic tendons of the hand is important to prevent finger stiffness.
  • Edema control can be initiated with compression gloves, digital massage, and active and passive ROM of the hand.
  • A home exercise program or outpatient occupational therapy is started immediately post-operatively to maintain full range of motion of the hand and limit the development of intrinsic muscle tightness

Primary Prevention

There are various preventive options to reduce the incidence of the Humerus fracture

  1. Using forearm and wrist guards during practicing sports (skating, biking)
  2. Using forearm and wrist guards during driving motorbikes
  3. Avoid falls in elderly individuals
  4. Prevention and/or treatment of osteoporosis
  5. Healthy diet

Secondary Prevention

It should be noted that the Post-menopausal women specially older than the age of 65 are at the higher risk of osteoporosis consequently these type of patients at greater risk for the pathological fractures .

So the Calcium and vitamin D supplementation play important role in increasing the bone mineral density (BMD) consequently decrease the risk of fracture in these type of patients. Also, avoiding excessive alcohol and quitting smoking play important role in this regard.

Detecting osteoporosis

Pharmacological therapy

Life style modifications

Template:Fractures

Template:WH Template:WS

References