Unstable angina / non ST elevation myocardial infarction prinzmetal's angina
Cardiology Network |
Discuss Unstable angina / non ST elevation myocardial infarction prinzmetal's angina further in the WikiDoc Cardiology Network |
Adult Congenital |
---|
Biomarkers |
Cardiac Rehabilitation |
Congestive Heart Failure |
CT Angiography |
Echocardiography |
Electrophysiology |
Cardiology General |
Genetics |
Health Economics |
Hypertension |
Interventional Cardiology |
MRI |
Nuclear Cardiology |
Peripheral Arterial Disease |
Prevention |
Public Policy |
Pulmonary Embolism |
Stable Angina |
Valvular Heart Disease |
Vascular Medicine |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Please Join in Editing This Page and Apply to be an Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [2] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.
Overview of Prinzmetal's Angina in UA / NSTEMI
ACC / AHA Guidelines (DO NOT EDIT) [1]
“ |
Class I1. Diagnostic investigation is indicated in patients with a clinical picture suggestive of coronary spasm, with investigation for the presence of transient myocardial ischemia and ST-segment elevation during chest pain. (Level of Evidence: A) 2. Coronary angiography is recommended in patients with episodic chest pain accompanied by transient ST segment elevation. (Level of Evidence: B) 3. Treatment with nitrates and calcium channel blockers is recommended in patients with variant angina whose coronary angiogram shows no or non obstructive coronary artery lesions. Risk factor modification is recommended, with patients with atherosclerotic lesions considered to be at higher risk. (Level of Evidence: B) Class IIb1. Percutaneous coronary intervention may be considered in patients with chest pain and transient ST segment elevation and a significant coronary artery stenosis. (Level of Evidence: B) 2. Provocative testing may be considered in patients with no significant angiographic CAD and no documentation of transient ST segment elevation when clinically relevant symptoms possibly explained by coronary artery spasm are present. (Level of Evidence: C) Class III1. Provocative testing is not recommended in patients with variant angina and high-grade obstructive stenosis on coronary angiography. (Level of Evidence: B) |
” |
See Also
Sources
- The ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction [1]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM; et al. (2007). "ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine". JACC. 50 (7): e1–e157. PMID 17692738. Text "doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.013 " ignored (help); Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help)