Persistent truncus arteriosus CT

	Persistent truncus arteriosus Microchapters
Home
Patient Information
Overview
Historical Perspective
Classification
Pathophysiology
Causes
Differentiating Persistent truncus arteriosus from other Diseases
Epidemiology and Demographics
Risk Factors
Screening
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Study of Choice
History and Symptoms
Physical Examination
Laboratory Findings
Electrocardiogram
Chest X Ray
Echocardiography
CT
MRI
Other Imaging Findings
Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Medical Therapy
Surgery
Primary Prevention
Secondary Prevention
Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy
Future or Investigational Therapies
Case Studies
Case #1
Persistent truncus arteriosus CT On the Web
Most recent articles
Most cited articles
Review articles
CME Programs
Powerpoint slides
Images
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Persistent truncus arteriosus CT All Images X-rays Echo & Ultrasound CT Images MRI
Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse
NICE Guidance
FDA on Persistent truncus arteriosus CT
CDC on Persistent truncus arteriosus CT
Persistent truncus arteriosus CT in the news
Blogs on Persistent truncus arteriosus CT
Directions to Hospitals Treating Type page name here
Risk calculators and risk factors for Persistent truncus arteriosus CT

References

Emma C. Ferguson, Rajesh Krishnamurthy, and Sandra A. A. Oldham. Classic Imaging Signs of Congenital Cardiovascular Abnormalities. RadioGraphics 2007 27: 1323-1334.
Joris P. A. Beerepoot, and Pamela K. Woodard. Case 71: Ebstein Anomaly. Radiology 2004 231: 747-751.

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Associate Editor-In-Chief: Keri Shafer, M.D. [2] Priyamvada Singh, MBBS [[3]]

Assistant Editor-In-Chief: Kristin Feeney, B.S. [[4]]

Computed tomography can be helpful as a diagnostic tool in conditions where the echocardiographic findings are inconclusive.

Computed tomography (CT) can be used as a diagnostic modality in congenital heart diseases.

Advantages

Provides additional anatomic details compared to echocardiography
It is done faster compared to MRI, thus avoiding the need for anesthesia in small children.

Disadvantage