Dilated cardiomyopathy laboratory findings

Dilated cardiomyopathy Microchapters
Home
Patient Information
Overview
Historical Perspective
Pathophysiology
Classification
Causes
Differentiating Dilated cardiomyopathy from other Diseases
Epidemiology and Demographics
Risk Factors
Screening
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Study of Choice
History and Symptoms
Physical Examination
Laboratory Findings
Electrocardiogram
X-ray
Echocardiography and Ultrasound
CT scan
MRI
Other Imaging Findings
Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Medical Therapy
Surgery
Primary Prevention
Secondary Prevention
Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy
Future or Investigational Therapies
Case Studies
Case #1
Dilated cardiomyopathy laboratory findings On the Web
Most recent articles
Most cited articles
Review articles
CME Programs
Powerpoint slides
Images
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Dilated cardiomyopathy laboratory findings All Images X-rays Echo & Ultrasound CT Images MRI
Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse
NICE Guidance
FDA on Dilated cardiomyopathy laboratory findings
CDC on Dilated cardiomyopathy laboratory findings
Dilated cardiomyopathy laboratory findings in the news
Blogs on Dilated cardiomyopathy laboratory findings
Directions to Hospitals Treating Dilated cardiomyopathy
Risk calculators and risk factors for Dilated cardiomyopathy laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Laboratory Findings

Endomyocardial biopsy has low sensitivy and the findings are also notoriously non-specific. The findings on biopsy usually involve findings of inflammation and specific pathogens are unlikely to be identified. There may be an increased yield to using MRI to target endomyocardial biopsy. Viral titiers (serologies) are often unhelpful and not routinely ordered in clinical practice.