Assertive community treatment

Revision as of 14:31, 4 September 2012 by WikiBot (talk | contribs) (Robot: Automated text replacement (-{{WikiDoc Cardiology Network Infobox}} +, -<references /> +{{reflist|2}}, -{{reflist}} +{{reflist|2}}))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Assertive community treatment, or ACT, is a form of total in-community care for people with serious, long-term mental illness.[1][2]

Definition

The defining characteristics of ACT include:

  • a clear focus on those participants (clients) who require the most help from the care delivery system;
  • an explicit mission to prevent homelessness and unnecessary hospitalization, as well as to promote the participants' independence, rehabilitation, and recovery;
  • a primary emphasis on home visits and other in vivo (out-of-the-office) interventions, eliminating the need to transfer learned behaviors from an artificial treatment setting to the "real world";[3]
  • a participant-to-staff ratio that is low enough to allow the ACT "core services team" to perform virtually all of the necessary treatment, rehabilitation, and community support tasks themselves in a coordinated and efficient manner -- unlike traditional case managers, who broker or "farm out" most of the work to other professionals;
  • a comprehensive approach to assessment and service planning by the interdisciplinary ACT team, which typically includes a psychiatrist and one or more nurses, social workers, substance abuse specialists, vocational rehabilitation counselors, and peer recovery specialists (individuals who have had personal, successful experience with the recovery process);
  • a willingness on the part of the ACT team to take ultimate professional responsibility for the participants' well-being in all areas of community functioning, including most especially the "nitty-gritty" aspects of everyday life;
  • a conscious effort to help participants avoid crisis situations in the first place or, if that proves impossible, to resolve their crises -- at any time, day or night -- without going back to the hospital; and
  • a promise to work with people on a time-unlimited basis, whether or not they can make measurable progress toward recovery, as long as they continue to demonstrate the need for this intensive level of professional help.[4][5][6][7]

Early developments

ACT was first developed during the early 1970s -- the heyday of deinstitutionalization, when large numbers of patients were being discharged from state-operated psychiatric hospitals to an underdeveloped, poorly integrated "nonsystem" of community services characterized by serious "gaps" and "cracks."[8] The founders of the approach were Leonard I. Stein, M.D.,[9][10][11][12][13][14] Mary Ann Test, Ph.D.,[15][16][17][3][18] [8][19][20] Arnold J. Marx, M.D.,[21] Deborah J. Allness, M.S.W.,[4][22] William H. Knoedler, M.D.,[4][23][24][25] and their colleagues[26][27][28][29][30] at the Mendota Mental Health Institute, a state hospital in Madison, Wisconsin.[31] Also known in the literature as the Training in Community Living (TCL) project, the Program of Assertive Community Treatment (PACT), or simply the "Madison model," this innovation seemed radical at the time but has since evolved into one of the most influential service delivery approaches in the history of community mental health.[32] The original Madison project received the American Psychiatric Association's prestigious Gold Award in 1974.[33] After conceiving the model as a strategy to prevent hospitalization in a relatively heterogeneous group of prospective state hospital patients, the PACT team turned its attention in the late 1970s and '80s to a more narrowly defined group of young adults with early-stage schizophrenia.[34]

ACT as an evidence-based practice

Because of its long track record of success with high-priority service recipients in a wide variety of geographical and organizational settings -- as demonstrated by a large and growing body of rigorous outcome evaluation studies[35][36] -- ACT has been recognized by the United States federal government's Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA),[37][38] the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation,[39] the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI),[40] and the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF),[41] among other recognized arbiters, as an evidence-based practice[42][43] worthy of widespread dissemination. It should also be pointed out, however, that some critics -- notably Tomi Gomory, Ph.D., at Florida State University[44][45] -- have argued that ACT is inherently "coercive" and that the research claiming to support it is scientifically invalid; Test and Stein have replied to this critique,[46] and Gomory, in turn, has answered their reply.[47]

Dissemination of ACT

Since the late 1970s, the ACT approach has been replicated or adapted widely.[48] The Harbinger program in Grand Rapids, Michigan,[49] is generally recognized as the first replication,[50][51] and a family-initiated adaptation in Minnesota also traces its origins to the Madison model.[52] In 1978, the Bridge program[5][53][54][55][56] at the Thresholds[57] psychosocial rehabilitation center in Chicago, Illinois, became the first big-city adaptation of ACT and the first program to focus on the most frequently hospitalized portion of the mental health consumer population.[58] In the 1980s and '90s, Thresholds further adapted the approach to serve deaf people with mental illness,[59] homeless people with mental illness,[60] people experiencing psychiatric crises,[61] and people with mental illness who had been inappropriately jailed.[62] In British Columbia, an experimental assertive outreach program based on the Thresholds model was established in 1988[63] and later expanded to additional sites. Outside of North America, one of the first research-based adaptations was an assertive outreach program in Australia.[64][65][66]

Other replications or adaptations of the ACT approach can be found throughout the English-speaking world. In Wisconsin, the original Madison model was adapted by its founders for the realities of a sparsely populated rural environment.[67][68] There are also major program concentrations in Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois,[54][57] Indiana (home of numerous research-based ACT programs[69][70] and the Indiana ACT Center[71]), Michigan (home of approximately 100 teams[72][73] and a professional organization called the Assertive Community Treatment Association[74]), Minnesota,[75] Missouri (home of an exemplary program for homeless people with co-occurring mental illness and chemical dependence[76][77][78]), New Jersey, New Mexico, New York,[79] North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina,[80][81] South Dakota, Texas, Virginia, Australia,[64][65] Canada,[82][83][84] and the United Kingdom,[85][86][87] among other places. An important issue for planners is to determine the number of ACT or "ACT-like" programs a particular geographical area needs.[88]

Research on ACT

ACT and its variations are among the most widely and intensively studied intervention approaches in community mental health.[89] The original Madison studies by Stein and Test and their colleagues are classics in the field.[9][10][11][12][21][90][91] Another major contributor to the ACT literature has been Gary Bond, Ph.D., who completed several studies at Thresholds in Chicago[61][92][93] before establishing the ACT Center of Indiana[94] at Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis. Bond has been particularly influential in the development of fidelity measurement scales for ACT[95][96][97][98][99] and other evidence-based practices.[100][101][102] He and his colleagues (especially Robert E. Drake, M.D., Ph.D.,[103][104][105][106][107] at Dartmouth Medical School) have attempted to consolidate and harmonize several major currents in this continuously developing area of practice -- for example, the different "styles" of service delivery exemplified by PACT in Madison, Thresholds in Chicago, the Dartmouth/New Hampshire model of integrated dual disorders treatment,[108] and other influential programs; the various modifications of the original ACT approach over the years to maximize its effectiveness with particular service delivery challenges, such as helping consumers to recover from co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders[109] or to obtain and retain competitive jobs through a rehabilitation approach called supported employment;[110] and the increasingly well-organized efforts to help consumers take charge of their own illness management and recovery processes.[111]

Although most of the early PACT replicates and adaptations were funded by grants from federal, state/provincial, or local mental health authorities, there has been a growing tendency to fund these services through Medicaid[81] and other publicly supported health insurance plans. Medicaid funding has been used for ACT services throughout the United States, starting in the late 1980s, when Allness left PACT to head Wisconsin's state mental health agency and led the development of ACT operational standards. Since then, U.S. and Canadian standards have been developed, and many states and provinces have used them in the development of ACT services for individuals with psychiatric disabilities who would otherwise be dependent on more costly, less effective alternatives.[112] Although Medicaid has turned out to be a mixed blessing -- it can be difficult to demonstrate a person's eligibility for this insurance program or to find supplemental funding for necessary services that it will not cover -- Medicaid reimbursement has led to a long-overdue expansion of ACT in previously unserved or underserved jurisdictions.[75]

Future of ACT

An important area for future program design and evaluation work is the use of ACT in concert with other established interventions, such as integrated dual disorders treatment,[109] supported employment,[110][81] family psychoeducation approaches for concerned relatives,[113][114] and dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) for persons with borderline personality disorder.[115][116][117] In general, the promulgation of separate evidence-based practices, not all of which are easily coordinated with each other, has once again made service integration an important issue for community mental health service delivery -- as it was in the last century, interestingly, when ACT was born;[8] some issues just will not go away.

See also

Notes

  1. Dixon, L. (2000). Assertive community treatment: Twenty-five years of gold. Psychiatric Services, 51, 759-765.
  2. For a good, basic ACT bibliography, go to: http://psych.iupui.edu/ACTCenter/Bibtop10.htm. For an introductory overview of the approach, go to: http://mimh200.mimh.edu/mimhweb/pie/reports/ACT%20Issue%20Brief.pdf.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Test, M. A., & Stein, L. I. (1976). Practical guidelines for the community treatment of markedly impaired patients. Community Mental Health Journal, 12, 72-82.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Allness, D. J., & Knoedler, W. H. (2003). A manual for ACT start-up: Based on the PACT model of community treatment for persons with severe and persistent mental illnesses. Arlington, VA: National Alliance on Mental Illness.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Witheridge, T. F. (1991). The "active ingredients" of assertive outreach. In N. L. Cohen (Ed.), Psychiatric outreach to the mentally ill (pp. 47-64). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. (New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 52.)
  6. McGrew, J. H., & Bond, G. R. (1995). Critical ingredients of assertive community treatment: Judgments of the experts. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 22, 113-125.
  7. Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., Mueser, K. T., & Latimer, E. (2001). Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental illness: Critical ingredients and impact on patients. Disease Management & Health Outcomes, 9, 141-159.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Test, M. A. (1979). Continuity of care in community treatment. New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 2. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 15-23.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Stein, L. I., & Test, M. A. (Eds.). Alternatives to mental hospital treatment. New York: Plenum Press, 1978.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Stein, L. I., & Test, M. A. (1980). Alternative to mental hospital treatment. I. Conceptual model, treatment program, and clinical evaluation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 392-397.
  11. 11.0 11.1 Weisbrod, B. A., Test, M. A., & Stein, L. I. (1980). Alternative to mental hospital treatment. II. Economic benefit-cost analysis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 400-405.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Test, M. A., & Stein, L. I. (1980). Alternative to mental hospital treatment. III. Social cost. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 409-412.
  13. Stein, L. I., & Santos, A. B. (1998). Assertive community treatment of persons with severe mental illness. New York & London: W. W. Norton
  14. Stein, L. I., & Test, M. A. (Eds.) (1985). The Training in Community Living model: A decade of experience. New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 26. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  15. Test, M. A. (1992). Training in Community Living. In R. P. Liberman (Ed.), Handbook of Psychiatric Rehabilitation. New York: Macmillan, 153-170.
  16. Test, M. A. (1981). Effective community treatment of the chronically mentally ill: What is necessary? Journal of Social Issues, 37, 71-86.
  17. Test., M. A., Knoedler, W., Allness, D., & Burke, S. S. (1992). Training in Community Living (TCL) model: Two decades of research. Outlook, a publication of the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors Research Institute, 2, July-August-September issue, 5-8.
  18. Test, M. A., & Stein, L. I. (1977). Use of special living arrangements: A model for decision-making. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 28, 608-610.
  19. Test, M. A., & Berlin, S. B. (1981). Issues of special concern to chronically mentally ill women. Professional Psychology, 12, 136-145.
  20. Test, M. A., Wallisch, L. S., Allness, D. J., & Ripp, K. (1989). Substance use in young adults with schizophrenic disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 15, 465-476.
  21. 21.0 21.1 Marx, A. J., Test, M. A., & Stein, L. I. (1973). Extrohospital management of severe mental illness. Feasibility and effects of social functioning. Archives of General Psychiatry, 29, 505-511.
  22. Allness, D. J., Knoedler, W. H., & Test, M.A. (1985). The dissemination and impact of a model program in process, 1972-1984. In L. I. Stein & M. A. Test (Eds.), The Training in Community Living Model: A Decade of Experience. New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 26. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  23. Knoedler, W. H. (1989). The continuous treatment team model: Role of the psychiatrist. Psychiatric Annals, 19, 35-40.
  24. Knoedler, W. H. (1979). How the training in community living program helps patients work. New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 2. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 57-66.
  25. For the interview, "What about assertive community treatment? An interview with PACT's William H. Knoedler, M.D.," go to the website of the National Alliance on Mental Illness: http://www.nami.org/Template.cfm?Section=ACT-TA_Center&template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=29070
  26. Brekke, J. S., & Test, M. A. (1987). An empirical analysis of services delivered in a model community support program. Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 10, 51-61.
  27. Brekke, J. S., Test, M. A. (1992). A model for measuring the implementation of community support programs: Results from three sites. Community Mental Health Journal, 28, 227-247.
  28. Cohen, L. J., Test, M. A., & Brown, R. L. (1990). Suicide and schizophrenia: Data from a prospective community treatment study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 602-607.
  29. Russert, M. G. & Frey, J. L. (1991). The PACT vocational model: A step into the future. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 14, 127-134.
  30. Ahrens, C. S., Frey, J. L., & Senn Burke, S. C. (1999). An individualized job engagement approach for persons with severe mental illness. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, October/November/December issue.
  31. For a fascinating reminiscence on the origins of ACT by Mary Ann Test, go to: http://www.healthieryou.com/j91.html#reflect.
  32. For an excellent bibliography on the Madison model, go to: http://dhfs.wisconsin.gov/MH_Mendota/Programs/Outpatient/PACT/bibliography.htm.
  33. Gold award: A community treatment program. Mendota Mental Health Institute, Madison, Wisconsin (1974). Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 25, 669-672.
  34. Test, M. A., Knoedler, W. H., & Allness, D. J. (1985). The long-term treatment of young schizophrenics in a community support program. In L. I. Stein & M. A. Test (Eds.), The Training in Community Living Model: A Decade of Experience. (New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 26.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985.
  35. Olfson, M. (1990). Assertive community treatment: An evaluation of the experimental evidence. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 41, 634-641.
  36. Mueser, K. T., Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., & Resnick, S. G. (1998). Models of community care for severe mental illness: A review of research on case management. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24, 37-74.
  37. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1999). Mental health: A report of the Surgeon General — Chapter 4: Adults and mental health. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health.
  38. For SAMHSA's "toolkit" on the ACT approach, go to: http://www.mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/cmhs/communitysupport/toolkits/community/default.asp
  39. Go to: http://www.rwjf.org/files/publications/books/2000/chapter_06.html#sixa
  40. Go to: http://www.nami.org/Template.cfm?Section=ACT-TA_Center&Template=/TaggedPage/TaggedPageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=4&ContentID=28611
  41. See CARF's 2007 Behavioral Health Standards Manual, available for purchase at: http://www.carf.org/default.aspx
  42. Go to: http://www.mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/cmhs/communitysupport/toolkits/about.asp
  43. Mueser, K. T., Torrey, W. C., Lynde, D., Singer, P., & Drake, R. E. (2003). Implementing evidence-based practices for people with severe mental illness. Behavior Modification, 27, 387-411.
  44. Gomory, T. (1998). Coercion Justified? — Evaluating the Training In Community Living Model — A Conceptual and Empirical Critique, Ph.D. dissertation, Social Welfare, University of California at Berkeley.
  45. Gomory, T. (2002). The origins of coercion in “Assertive Community Treatment” (ACT): A review of early publications from the “Special Treatment Unit” (STU) of Mendota State Hospital. Ethical Human Sciences and Services, 4, 3-16.
  46. Test, M. A., & Stein, L. I. (2001). Letters: A critique of the effectiveness of assertive community treatment. Psychiatric Services, 52, 1396-1397
  47. Gomory, Tomi (2002) Effectiveness of Assertive Community Treatment, Psychiatric Services, 53, 103, http://ps.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/53/1/103?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=Gomory+t&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&sortspec=relevance&resourcetype=HWCIT. Letters: A critique of the effectiveness of assertive community treatment. Psychiatric Services, 52, 1394
  48. Deci, A. B., Santos, A. B., Hiott, D. W., Schoenwald, S., & Dias, J. K. (1995). Dissemination of assertive community treatment programs. Psychiatric Services, 46, 676-678.
  49. This program is now part of a larger agency, Touchstone innovaré; for more information, go to: http://www.ti-gr.com/
  50. Mowbray, C. T., Collins, M. E., Plum, T. B., Masterton, T., & Mulder, R. (1997). Harbinger I: The development and evaluation of the first PACT replication. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 25, 105-123.
  51. Mowbray, C. T., Plum, T. B., & Masterton, T. (1997). Harbinger II: Deployment and evolution of assertive community treatment in Michigan. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 25, 125-139.
  52. This project, called Supporting Life in the Community, is now part of a larger agency, Mental Health Resources.
  53. Witheridge, T. F., Dincin, J., & Appleby, L. (1982). Working with the most frequent recidivists: A total team approach to assertive resource management. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 5, 9-11.
  54. 54.0 54.1 Witheridge, T. F., & Dincin, J. (1985). The Bridge: An assertive outreach program in an urban setting. In L. I. Stein & M. A. Test (Eds.), The Training in Community Living model: A decade of experience (pp. 65-76). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. (New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 26.)
  55. Witheridge, T. F. (1989). The assertive community treatment worker: An emerging role and its implications for professional training. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 40, 620-624.
  56. McGrew, J. H., & Bond, G. R. (1997). The association between program characteristics and service delivery in assertive community treatment. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 25, 175-189.
  57. 57.0 57.1 For information about Thresholds and its Bridge assertive outreach programs, go to: http://www.thresholds.org/home2.asp.
  58. Witheridge, T. F. (1990). Assertive community treatment: A strategy for helping persons with severe mental illness to avoid rehospitalization. In N. L. Cohen (Ed.), Psychiatry takes to the streets: Outreach and crisis intervention for the mentally ill (pp. 80-106). New York: Guilford Press.
  59. Witheridge, T. (1994). The "active ingredients" of a program that works. In A. B. Critchfield (Ed.), Psychosocial rehabilitation for persons who are deaf and mentally ill: Breakout III -- new traditions (pp. 113-121). Columbia, South Carolina: South Carolina Department of Mental Health.
  60. Slagg, N. B., Lyons, J., Cook, J. A., Wasmer, D. J., Witheridge, T. F., & Dincin, J. (1994). A profile of clients served by a mobile outreach program for homeless mentally ill persons. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 45, 1139-1141.
  61. 61.0 61.1 Bond, G. R., Witheridge, T. F., Wasmer, D., Dincin, J., McRae, S. A., Mayes, J., & Ward, R. S. (1989). A comparison of two crisis housing alternatives to psychiatric hospitalization. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 40, 177-183.
  62. Gold Award: Helping mentally ill people break the cycle of jail and homelessness. The Thresholds State, County Collaborative Jail Linkage Project, Chicago (2001). Psychiatric Services, 52, 1380-1382.
  63. Higenbottam, J. A., Etches, B., Shewfelt, Y., & Alberti, M. (1992). Riverview/Fraser Valley assertive outreach program. In R. B. Deber & G. G. Thompson (Eds.), Restructuring Canada's health services system: How do we get there from here? Proceedings of the Fourth Canadian Conference on Health Economics, August 27-29, 1990, University of Toronto. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 185-190.
  64. 64.0 64.1 Hoult, J., Reynolds, I., Charbonneau-Powis, M., Coles, P., & Briggs, J. (1981). A controlled study of psychiatric hospital versus community treatment - the effect on relatives. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 15, 323-328.
  65. 65.0 65.1 Hoult, J., Reynolds, I., Charbonneau-Powis, M., Weekes, P., & Briggs, J. (1983). Psychiatric hospital versus community treatment: The results of a randomised trial. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 17, 160-167.
  66. Hoult, J. (1987). Replicating the Mendota model in Australia. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 38, 565.
  67. Field, G., Allness, D., & Knoedler, W. H. (1980). Application of the Training in Community Living program to rural areas. Journal of Community Psychology, 8, 9-15.
  68. Diamond, R. J., & Van Dyke, D. (1985). Rural community support programs: The experience in three Wisconsin counties. In L. I. Stein & M. A. Test (Eds.), The Training in Community Living Model: A decade of experience (pp. 49 – 63). (New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 26.)
  69. Bond, G. R., Miller, L. D., Krumwied, R. D., & Ward, R. S. (1988). Assertive case management in three CMHCs: A controlled study. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 39, 411 – 418.
  70. McDonel, E. C., Bond, G. R., Salyers, M., Fekete, D., Chen, A., McGrew, J. H., & Miller, L. (1997). Implementing assertive community treatment programs in rural settings. Journal of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 25, 153-173.
  71. For information about the Indiana ACT Center, go to: http://psych.iupui.edu/ACTCenter/.
  72. According to the state's Department of Community Health, Michigan ACT teams served 6,487 people in fiscal 2004; for more information, go to: http://www.michigan.gov/mdch/0,1607,7-132-2941_4868_38495_38496_38504-130083--,00.html.
  73. For a description of Michigan's statewide ACT program development initiative, see: Plum, T. B., & Lawther, S. (1992). How Michigan established a highly effective statewide community-based program for persons with serious and persistent mental illness. Outlook, a publication of the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors Research Institute, 2, July-August-September issue, 2-5.
  74. Go to: http://www.actassociation.org/
  75. 75.0 75.1 In Minnesota, ACT became a Medicaid-funded service in 2005; now there are more than two dozen teams, serving both urban and rural parts of the state. For a list of Minnesota ACT teams, go to: http://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/groups/disabilities/documents/pub/dhs_id_049223.hcsp.
  76. Morse, G. A., Calsyn, R. J., Klinkenberg, W. D., Trusty, M. L., Gerber, F., Smith, R., Tempelhoff, B., & Ahmad, L.(1997). An experimental comparison of three types of case management for homeless mentally ill persons. Psychiatric Services, 48, 497-503.
  77. Morse, G. A., Calsyn, R. J., Miller, J., Rosenberg, P., West, L., & Gilliland, J. (1996). Outreach to homeless mentally ill people: Conceptual and clinical considerations. Community Mental Health Journal, 32, 261-274.
  78. Morse, G., Calsyn, R. J., Allen, G., Tempelhoff, B., & Smith, R. (1992). Experimental comparison of the effects of three treatment programs for homeless mentally ill people. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 43, 1005-1010.
  79. For a list of ACT programs in New York, go to: http://www.omh.state.ny.us/omhweb/ebp/ACTDirectory.htm.
  80. Gold, P. B., Meisler, N., Santos, A. B., Carnemolla, M. A, Williams, O. H., & Keleher, J. (2005). Randomized trial of supported employment integrated with assertive community treatment for rural adults with severe mental illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32, 378-395.
  81. 81.0 81.1 81.2 Gold, P. B., Meisler, N., Santos, A. B., Keleher, J., Becker, D. R., Knoedler, W. H., Carnemolla, M. A., Williams, O. H., Toscvano, R., & Stormer, G. (2003). The Program of Assertive Community Treatment: Implementation and dissemination of an evidence-based model of community-based care for persons with severe and persistent mental illness. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 10, 290-303.
  82. Wasylenki, D. A., Goering, P. N., Lemire, D., Lindsey, S., & Lancee, W. (1993). The Hostel Outreach Program: Assertive case management for homeless mentally ill persons. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 44, 848-853.
  83. Lafave, H. G., de Souza, H. R., & Gerber, G. J. (1996). Assertive community treatment of severe mental illness: A Canadian experience. Psychiatric Services, 47, 757-759.
  84. Tibbo, P., Joffe, K., Chue, P., Metelitsa, A., & Wright, E. (2001). Global Assessment of Functioning following assertive community treatment in Edmonton, Alberta: A longitudinal study. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 131-137.
  85. Marshall, M., & Creed, F. (2000). Assertive community treatment - is it the future of community care in the UK? International Review of Psychiatry, 12, 191-196.
  86. Burns, T., & Firn, M. (2002). Assertive outreach in mental health: A manual for practitioners. New York: Oxford University Press.
  87. Fiander, M., Burns, T., McHugo, G. J., & Drake, R. E. (2003). Assertive community treatment across the Atlantic: Comparison of model fidelity in the UK and USA. British Journal of Psychiatry, 182, 248-254.
  88. Cuddeback, G. S., Morrissey, J. P., & Meyer, P. S. (2006). How many assertive community treatment teams do we need? Psychiatric Services, 57, 1803-1806.
  89. Mueser, K. T., Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., & Resnick, S. G. (1998). Models of community care for severe mental illness: A review of research on case management. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24, 37-74.
  90. Stein, L. I., & Test, M. A. (1976). Retraining hospital staff for work in a community program in Wisconsin. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 27, 266-268.
  91. Test, M. A., & Stein, L. I. (1977). Special living arrangements: A model for decision-making. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 28, 608-610.
  92. Bond, G. R., Witheridge, T. F., Setze, P. J., & Dincin, J. (1985). Preventing rehospitalization of clients in a psychosocial rehabilitation program. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 36, 993-995.
  93. Bond, G. R., Witheridge, T. F., Dincin, J., Wasmer, D., Webb, J., & de Graaf-Kaser, R. (1990). Assertive community treatment for frequent users of psychiatric hospitals in a large city: A controlled study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 865-891.
  94. For information on the ACT Center of Indiana, go to: http://psych.iupui.edu/ACTCenter/. For a brief overview of ACT by Bond, go to: http://www.bhrm.org/guidelines/ACTguide.pdf
  95. Bond led the development of the most widely used fidelity instrument for ACT, the Dartmouth Assertive Community Treatment Scale (DACTS). For the complete DACTS, go to: http://psych.iupui.edu/ACTCenter/ACTFidelityScale.pdf
  96. McGrew, J. H., Bond, G. R. Dietzen, L., & Salyers, M. (1994). Measuring the fidelity of implementation of a mental health program model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 670-678.
  97. Teague, G. B., Bond, G. R., & Drake, R. E. (1998). Program fidelity in assertive community treatment: Development and use of a measure. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, 216-232.
  98. Salyers, M. P., Bond, G. R., Teague, G. B., Cox, J. F., Smith, M. E., Hicks, M. L., & Koop, J. I. (2003). Is it ACT yet? Real-world examples of evaluating the degree of implementation for assertive community treatment. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 30, 304-320.
  99. Bond, G. R., & Salyers, M. P. (2004). Prediction of outcome from the Dartmouth assertive community treatment fidelity scale. CNS Spectrums, 9, 937-942.
  100. Bond, G. R., Evans, L., Salyers, M. P., Williams, J., & Kim, H. K. (2000). Measurement of fidelity in psychiatric rehabilitation. Mental Health Services Research, 2, 75-87.
  101. Bond, G. R., Campbell, K., Evans, L. J., Gervey, R., Pascaris, A., Tice, S., Del Bene, D., & Revell, G. (2002). A scale to measure quality of supported employment for persons with severe mental illness. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 17, 239-250.
  102. Mueser, K. T., Fox, L., Bond, G. R., Salyers, M. P., Yamamoto, K., & Williams, J. (2003). Integrated Dual Disorders Treatment Fidelity Scale. In K. T. Mueser, D. L. Noordsy, R. E. Drake, & L. Fox (Eds.), Integrated treatment for dual disorders: A guide to effective practice (pp. 337-359). New York: Guilford Publications.
  103. Minkoff, K. & Drake, R. E. (Eds.) (1991). Dual diagnosis of major mental illness and substance disorder. New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 50, 95-107. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  104. Torrey, W. C., Drake, R. E., Dixon, L., Burns, B. J., Rush, A. J., Clark, R. E., & Klatzker, D. (2001). Implementing evidence-based practices for persons with severe mental illnesses. Psychiatric Services, 52, 45-50.
  105. Becker, D. R., & Drake, R. E. (2003). A working life for people with severe mental illness. New York: Oxford University Press.
  106. Drake, R. E., Becker, D. R., & Bond, G. R. (2003). Recent research on vocational rehabilitation for persons with severe mental illness. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 16, 451-455.
  107. For Drake's publications in this area, go to: http://hcr3.isiknowledge.com/author.cgi?&link1=Browse&link2=Results&id=5158.
  108. McHugo, G. J., Drake, R. E., Teague, G. B., Xie, H. Y. (1999). Fidelity to assertive community treatment and client outcomes in the New Hampshire dual disorders study. Psychiatric Services, 50, 818-824.
  109. 109.0 109.1 Drake, R. E., Mercer-McFadden, C., Mueser, K. T., McHugo, G. J., & Bond, G. R. (1998). Treatment of substance abuse in patients with severe mental illness: A review of recent research. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24, 589-608.
  110. 110.0 110.1 Bond, G. R., Becker, D. R., Drake, R. E., Rapp, C. A., Meisler, N., Lehman, A. F., Bell, M. D., & Blyler, C. R. (2001). Implementing supported employment as an evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Services, 52, 313-322.
  111. The SAMSHA toolkit for the evidence-based practice known as illness management and recovery can be found at: http://www.mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/cmhs/communitysupport/toolkits/illness/default.asp.
  112. For the 2003 version of the national standards written by Allness and Knoedler, go to the website of the National Alliance on Mental Illness and click on "national program standards for ACT teams": http://www.nami.org/Template.cfm?Section=ACT-TA_Center&Template=/TaggedPage/TaggedPageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=4&ContentID=28611
  113. McFarlane, W. R., Stastny, P., & Deakins, S. (1992). Family-aided assertive community treatment: A comprehensive rehabilitation and intensive case management approach for persons with schizophrenic disorders. New Directions for Mental Health Services, 53, 43-54.
  114. Dixon, L., McFarlane, W. R., Lefley, H., Lucksted, A., Cohen, M., Falloon, I., Mueser, K., Miklowitz, D., Solomon, P., & Sondheimer, D. (2001). Evidence-based practices for services to families of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatric Services, 52, 903-910.
  115. Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.
  116. For information on DBT, go to: http://www.behavioraltech.com/sitemap.cfm.
  117. For a good overview of the issues, see: Links, P. S. (1998). Developing effective services for patients with personality disorders. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 251-259. Innovative programs are described in: Basevitz, P., & Aubry, T. (2002). Providing services to individuals with borderline personality disorder in the context of ACT: Research base and recommendations. Ottawa: Centre for Research on Community Services, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa; available at: http://www.sciencessociales.uottawa.ca/crcs/pdf/pinecrest.pdf