Aortic dissection CT

Revision as of 16:55, 10 October 2012 by Aarti Narayan (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Aortic dissection Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Aortic dissection from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Special Scenarios

Management during Pregnancy

Case Studies

Case #1


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];

Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2], Aarti Narayan, M.B.B.S [3]

Overview

Computed tomography angiography

  • Computed tomography angiography is a fast non-invasive test that will give an accurate three-dimensional view of the aorta. These images are produced by taking rapid thin cut slices of the chest and abdomen, and combining them in the computer to create cross-sectional slices.
  • In order to delineate the aorta to the accuracy necessary to make the proper diagnosis, an iodinated contrast material is injected into a peripheral vein. Contrast is injected and the scan performed using a Bolus Tracking method. This is a type of scan timed to an injection, in order to capture the contrast as it enters the aorta.
  • The scan will then follow the contrast as it flows though the vessel.

Advantages of CT

  • Readily available at most hospitals, even on an emergency basis.
  • Easy identification of intraluminal thrombus and pericardial effusions.
  • CT scanning with contrast has a reported sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 87%. The accuracy of CT can be further improved with spiral CT and ultrafast CT (Electron beam CT).

Disadvantages of CT

  • The need for iodinated contrast material.
  • Inability to see the intimal flap in more than 75 % of patients.
  • Inability to diagnose the site of the intimal tear.
  • Assessment of coronary arteries and aortic incompetence is difficult with a CT.

Differentiating a true lumen from the false lumen

  • Beak sign: In the false lumen, there will be an acute angle between the dissection flap and the arterial wall.
  • Aortic cobwebs: In the false lumen, there may be fibroelastic bands.
  • Size: False lumen is usually larger than the true lumen.
  • Diplaced intimal calcification: Usually faces the true lumen.

Labeled CT images shown below are courtesy of Radswiki and copylefted:



References

Template:WH Template:WS