Atrial septal defect robotic repair

Revision as of 13:58, 1 November 2012 by WikiBot (talk | contribs) (Robot: Automated text replacement (-mgibson@perfuse.org +charlesmichaelgibson@gmail.com & -kfeeney@perfuse.org +kfeeney@elon.edu))
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Atrial Septal Defect Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Anatomy

Classification

Ostium Secundum Atrial Septal Defect
Ostium Primum Atrial Septal Defect
Sinus Venosus Atrial Septal Defect
Coronary Sinus
Patent Foramen Ovale
Common or Single Atrium

Pathophysiology

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural History and Prognosis

Complications

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography

Transesophageal Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography
Contrast Echocardiography
M-Mode
Doppler

Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound

Cardiac Catheterization

Exercise Testing

ACC/AHA Guidelines for Evaluation of Unoperated Patients

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Indications for Surgical Repair
Surgical Closure
Minimally Invasive Repair


Robotic ASD Repair
Percutaneous Closure
Post-Surgical Follow Up

Special Scenarios

Pregnancy
Diving and Decompression Sickness
Paradoxical Emboli
Pulmonary Hypertension
Eisenmenger's Syndrome
Atmospheric Pressure

Case Studies

Case #1

Atrial septal defect robotic repair On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Atrial septal defect robotic repair

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Atrial septal defect robotic repair

CDC on Atrial septal defect robotic repair

Atrial septal defect robotic repair in the news

Blogs on Atrial septal defect robotic repair

Directions to Hospitals Treating Type page name here

Risk calculators and risk factors for Atrial septal defect robotic repair

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editors-In-Chief: Priyamvada Singh, MBBS [2]; Assistant Editor-In-Chief: Kristin Feeney, B.S. [3]

Overview

Robotic repair is done through the 'da Vinci Surgical System' (Intuitive Surgical) is the most recent and advanced approach for the repair of atrial septal defect [1]. Due to this technique a surgeon can perform operations from a remote distance. The surgeon gets an excellent three dimensional view of the heart through the fiberoptic stereoscopic camera. The surgeon's hand motions are relayed to a computer processor, which digitizes and relays them to the fine instrument placed into the chest through small port incisions.

Robotic Repair

Component of robotic repair

  • Surgeon console
  • Computerized control system
  • Two instrument arms
  • Fiberoptic camera

Advantage

Surgery specific

  • High degree of freedom of hand movement.
  • Better precision compared to hand done surgery.
  • Performance of complex operations with great success.
  • Operation could be performed by the surgeon from remote distance.
  • Excellent visualization and magnification of internal anatomy due to two camera system.
  • Doctor does the surgery remotely, so there is decrease in spread of infection to patient from the doctor.

Patient specific

  • Small incisions
  • Minimal scarring
  • Decreased bleeding
  • Decreased infection
  • Shorter recovery period
  • Less traumatic for patient
  • No restrictions in activities
  • Less pain so less use of pain medications
  • Shorter hospital stay (usually 3 to 4 days)

Video: Robotic repair

Heart surgeons are now using robots to help them perform surgeries such as septal defect repairs, coronary artery bypass operations. Advantages of this procedure are smaller incision, faster recovery and fewer complications for the patients.

{{#ev:youtube|suJahF9VCe4}}

References

  1. Suematsu Y, Kiaii B, Bainbridge DT, del Nido PJ, Novick RJ (2007). "Robotic-assisted closure of atrial septal defect under real-time three-dimensional echo guide: in vitro study". Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 32 (4): 573–6. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.06.026. PMID 17702588.


Template:WikiDoc Sources