Irregular lesion
Coronary Angiography | |
General Principles | |
---|---|
Anatomy & Projection Angles | |
Normal Anatomy | |
Anatomic Variants | |
Projection Angles | |
Epicardial Flow & Myocardial Perfusion | |
Epicardial Flow | |
Myocardial Perfusion | |
Lesion Complexity | |
ACC/AHA Lesion-Specific Classification of the Primary Target Stenosis | |
Lesion Morphology | |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Overview
The appearence of irregular lesions with intraluminal filling defects and contrast staining is detected by coronary angiography and may indicate a fissured atherosclerotic plaque with adherent thrombus.[1]
Definition
A stenosis is classified as having irregular contour if the vascular margin is rough or has a "sawtooth" appearance.[2]
Pathophysiology
Grading of Lesion Irregularity
- Grade 0: Smooth – no irregularity.
- Grade 1: Mildly Irregular – lesion has an indistinct lumen edge.
- Grade 2: Sawtoothed/Grossly Irregular – lesion has defined jagged or “sawtoothed” lumen edges.
Clinical Significance
- The degree of irregularity is correlated with the risk of clinical instability in the next 10 days once the unstable features partially resolve over 5 to 10 days.[3]
- Greater irregularity of lesions are more likely to appear in the infarct-related artery than in lesions in the other coronary arteries of patients with acute infarction. and they are also related to the appearence of unstable angina.[4]
- The lesion irregularity is the second most important risk factor of diameter stenosis as a predictor of future infarction.[5]
Example
References
- ↑ Davies, SW.; Marchant, B.; Lyons, JP.; Timmis, AD.; Rothman, MT.; Layton, CA.; Balcon, R. (1991). "Irregular coronary lesion morphology after thrombolysis predicts early clinical instability". J Am Coll Cardiol. 18 (3): 669–74. PMID 1869729. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Ellis, SG.; Vandormael, MG.; Cowley, MJ.; DiSciascio, G.; Deligonul, U.; Topol, EJ.; Bulle, TM. (1990). "Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group". Circulation. 82 (4): 1193–202. PMID 2401060. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Davies, SW.; Marchant, B.; Lyons, JP.; Timmis, AD.; Rothman, MT.; Layton, CA.; Balcon, R. (1990). "Coronary lesion morphology in acute myocardial infarction: demonstration of early remodeling after streptokinase treatment". J Am Coll Cardiol. 16 (5): 1079–86. PMID 2229751. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Wilson, RF.; Holida, MD.; White, CW. (1986). "Quantitative angiographic morphology of coronary stenoses leading to myocardial infarction or unstable angina". Circulation. 73 (2): 286–93. PMID 3943163. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Ellis, S.; Alderman, EL.; Cain, K.; Wright, A.; Bourassa, M.; Fisher, L. (1989). "Morphology of left anterior descending coronary territory lesions as a predictor of anterior myocardial infarction: a CASS Registry Study". J Am Coll Cardiol. 13 (7): 1481–91. PMID 2656822. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help)