Pulmonary embolism resident survival guide
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor-In-Chief: Rim Halaby; Pratik Bahekar, MBBS [2]; Chetan Lokhande, M.B.B.S [3]
Pulmonary embolism Resident Survival Guide Microchapters |
---|
Overview |
Causes |
FIRE |
Diagnosis |
Treatment |
Do's |
Don'ts |
Overview
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the acute obstruction of the pulmonary artery or one of its branches. The obstruction in the pulmonary artery can be due to thrombus, air, tumor, or fat. Most often, PE is due to a venous thrombosis which has been dislodged from its site of formation in the deep veins of the lower extremities, a process referred to as thromboembolism. PE is a potentially lethal condition. The patient can present with a range of signs and symptoms; however the typical presentation is characterized by dyspnea (78-81% of the cases), pleuritic chest pain (39-56% of the cases) and syncope (22-26% of the cases)[1]. In severe cases, hypotension and/or shock can occur.
Causes
Life Threatening Causes
Pulmonary embolism is a life-threatening condition and must be treated as such irrespective of the underlying cause.
Common Causes
- Blood clot
- Air bubble
- Fragment of a tumor
- Fragment of fat (secondary to bone fracture)
Classification
Massive Pulmonary Embolism
Massive pulmonary embolism falls under the category "high risk patients" in the European guidelines. High risk PE patients have a risk of PE-related early mortality of > 15%.[2]
Massive PE is characterized by the presence of:
- Sustained hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg), not due to arrhythmia, hypovolemia, sepsis, or left ventricular dysfunction, and either lasting for at least 15 minutes or necessitating the administration of inotropic support
OR
OR
- Persistent profound bradycardia (heart rate < 40 bpm) plus findings of shock[3]
Submassive Pulmonary Embolism
Submassive pulmonary embolism falls under the category "intermediate risk patients" in the European guidelines. Intermediate risk PE patients have a risk of PE-related early mortality ranging between 3 and 15%.[2]
Submassive PE is characterized by:
AND
- Absence of systemic hypotension (systolic blood pressure >90 mm Hg)[4] [3]
Right Ventricular Dysfunction
Right ventricular dysfunction is characterized by the presence of AT LEAST ONE of the following:[4] [3]
- Echocardiography findings:
- CT findings: RV dilation (4-chamber RV diameter divided by LV diameter > 0.9)
- BNP > 90 pg/mL
- N-terminal pro-BNP >500 pg/mL
- EKG findings:
- New complete or incomplete right bundle-branch block
- Anteroseptal ST elevation or ST depression
- Anteroseptal T-wave inversion
Myocardial Necrosis
Myocardial necrosisis defined as the presence of:[4] [3]
- Elevation of troponin I (>0.4 ng/mL)
OR
- Elevation of troponin T (>0.1 ng/mL)
Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism
Low risk PE patients have a risk of PE-related early mortality of <1%.[2] Low risk PE is characterized by the absence of hypotension, shock, RV dysfunction and myocardial necrosis.[3]
FIRE: Focused Initial Rapid Evaluation
A Focused Initial Rapid Evaluation (FIRE) should be performed to identify patients in need of immediate intervention.[2][3][5]
Step 1: Confirm PE
Identify cardinal findings that increase the pretest probability of PE Dyspnea Pleuritic chest pain Syncope Tachycardia Tachypnea | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Does the patient who is suspected to have PE have hypotension or shock? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suspected high-risk PE | Suspected non-high risk PE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Administer anticoagulation (in case there are no contraindications) during the diagnostic workup | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is a CT available immediately? | What is the pretest probability of PE? Assess the pretest probability of PE by using one of the risk score: - Wells score - Geneva score - PERC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Order echocardiography | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Does the patient have RV overload? | Low pretest probability | Intermediate pretest probability | High pretest probability OR PE is likely | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Administer anticoagulation (in case there are no contraindications) during the diagnostic workup | Administer anticoagulation (in case there are no contraindications) during the diagnostic workup | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No | Yes | Order CT | Order D-dimer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is the patient unstable OR no other tests are available? | Is the patient stabilized AND CT is now available? | Order CT | PE is excluded | Order CT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PE is excluded | Consider thrombolytic therapy or embolectomy | Order CT | PE is confirmed | PE is excluded | PE is confirmed | PE is excluded | PE is confirmed | PE is excluded | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Positive for PE | Negative for PE | Click here for the initial treatment | Click here for the initial treatment | Click here for the initial treatment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PE is confirmed | PE is excluded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Click here for the initial treatment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Step 2: Initial Treatment
Assess the severity of pulmonary embolism | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Massive PE (also known as high-risk PE) Cardiogenic shock OR Persistent hypotension (≤90mmHg) OR Drop of the blood pressure by ≥ 40mmHg for > 15 min[6] OR Pulselessness OR Profound bradycardia (<40 bpm) with findings of shock[3] | Submassive PE (also know as intermediate-risk PE) Right ventricular dysfunction AND/OR Myocardial injury (Troponin +) | Low-risk PE No cardiogenic shock AND No hypotension AND No right ventricular dysfunction AND No myocardial injury (Troponin -) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provide hemodynamic and respiratory support Begin high dose unfractionated heparin [6]: Bolus 10.000 U
Administer rapidly 500-1000 mL of normal saline (Caution with fluid overload)[6] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is there any contraindication for fibrinolytic therapy? | Is there any contraindication for anticoagulation therapy? | Is there any contraindication for anticoagulation therapy? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NO | YES | NO | YES | NO | YES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinue unfractionated heparin AND Begin fibrinolytic therapy | Surgical pulmonary embolectomy OR Percutaneous catheter embolectomy | Anticoagulation therapy AND Hospital admission | IVC filter AND Hospital admission | Anticoagulation therapy AND Early discharge/home treatment | IVC filter AND Early discharge/home treatment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Does the patient fail to improve OR Develop cardiogenic shock? OR Develop hypotension? | Does the patient fail to improve OR Develop cardiogenic shock? OR Develop hypotension (<90 mmHg)? OR Develop respiratory distress (SaO2<95% with Borg score>8 or altered mental status) OR Have moderate to severe RV dysfunction (RV hypokinesis or estimated RVSP>40 mmHg) OR Elevated biomarkers (troponin> upper limit of normal, BNP>100 pg/mL, or pro-BNP>900 pg/mL)[3] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
YES | NO | YES | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Surgical pulmonary embolectomy OR Percutaneous catheter embolectomy | Continue with the same treatment | Is there any contraindication for fibrinolytic therapy? | Continue with the same treatment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NO | YES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hold anticoagulation and give thrombolytics | Surgical pulmonary embolectomy OR Percutaneous catheter embolectomy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Does the patient fail to improve? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
YES | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Surgical pulmonary embolectomy OR Percutaneous catheter embolectomy | Continue with the same treatment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Choice of Initial Anticoagulation Therapy
Begin initial anticoagulation therapy in: ❑ Confirmed PE OR ❑ High or intermediate probability of PE while awaiting the diagnostic tests | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Is the patient high risk or non-high risk? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
High risk | Non-high risk | ||||||||||||||||||||||
❑ Administer IV unfractionated heparin
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||
❑ Administer unfractionated heparin:
| ❑ Administer ONE of the following:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment of Heparin Dosage According to aPTT
aPTT | Variation in the dosage[2] |
< 1.2 x control (<35 s) | Bolus: 80 U/kg Infusion rate: increase by 4 U/kg/h |
1.2-1.5 x control (35-45 s) | Bolus: 40 U/kg Infusion rate: increase by 2 U/kg/h |
1.5-2.3 x control (46-70 s) | Continue the same dosage |
2.3-3.0 x control (71-90 s) | Infusion rate: decrease by 2 U/kg/h |
> 3.0 x control (>90s) | Stop infusion for a period of 1 hour, then Infusion rate: decrease by 3 U/kg/h |
Contraindications to Anticoagulation
Contraindications to Fibrinolytic Therapy
Shown below is a table summarizing the absolute and relative contraindications to fibrinolytic therapy among pulmonary embolism patients.[2]
Absolute contraindications | Relative contraindications |
❑ Previous hemorrhagic stroke or stroke of unknown origin ❑ Ischemic stroke within the last 6 months |
❑ Transient ischemic attack within the last 6 months ❑ Oral anticoagulant therapy intake |
Complete Diagnostic Approach
A complete diagnostic approach should be carried out after a focused initial rapid evaluation is conducted and following initiation of any urgent intervention.
Abbreviations:
Characterize the symptoms: ❑ Dyspnea (78–81%)[7]
| |||||||||
Identify predisposing factors:[2] ❑ Bone fracture (hip or leg) Obtain a detailed history:
❑ Family history (suggestive of inherited thrombophilia) ❑ Social history (increased risk in females)
❑ Medications | |||||||||
Examine the patient: Vital signs
❑ Tachycardia (26%)[2] Skin Heart
❑ Accentuated P2 Lungs | |||||||||
Long Term Management
The long term management of PE depends on whether the episode is the first episode or not, whether it is provoked or unprovoked and the risk of bleeding of the patient. Among non cancer patients, the first line therapy for long term management of PE is vitamin K antagonists (VKA); whereas the first line treatment among cancer patients is low molecular weight heparin. If long term treatment with VKA is decided, VKA should be started at the same day with heparin allowing for at least 5 days of overlap until the INR is ≥2 for at least 24 hours. Among patients on extended anticoagulation therapy, the risk vs benefits of the anticoagulation therapy should be assessed regularly (for example annually).[5]
Is this the first or second episode of PE? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
First episode | Second episode | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is PE provoked? | What is the risk of bleeding? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes, transient reversible risk factor | Yes, cancer | No (unprovoked) | Low or moderate | High | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Therapy for 3 months | Extended therapy or until cancer is cured | Therapy for ≥ 3 months | Extended therapy | Therapy for 3 months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re-assess the risk of bleeding | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Low or moderate | High | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extended therapy | Do not extend the therapy beyond the initial 3 months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment of Risk of Bleeding
The risk factors of bleeding with anticoagulation therapy are:[5]
- Age > 75 years
- Alcohol abuse
- Anemia
- Antiplatelet therapy
- Cancer
- Comorbidity and reduced functional capacity
- Diabetes
- Frequent falls
- Liver failure
- Metastatic cancer
- Poor anticoagulant control
- Previous bleeding
- Prior stroke
- Recent surgery
- Renal failure
- Thrombocytopenia
Shown below is a table summarizing the risk of bleed based on the number of risk factors. Note that, although the presence of one risk factor signify moderate risk of bleeding, if the single risk factor is severe (such as severe thrombocytopenia or recent major surgery) then the patient is at high risk of bleeding despite the presence of a single risk factor.
Risk of bleeding | Number of risk factors[5] |
Low Risk | 0 |
Moderate Risk | 1 |
High Risk | ≥2 |
Do's
- When indicated, administer fibrinolytic therapy for a short infusion time (for 2 hours) rather than over prolonged perfusion (for 24 hours).[5]
- Consider stent placement in the iliac vein to manage obstructive lesions after CDT, PCDT, or surgical venous thrombectomy. (Class IIa; Level of Evidence C)
- Consider a trial of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty without stenting to manage isolated obstructive lesions in the common femoral vein.(Class IIa; Level of Evidence C).
- Consider an iliac vein stent in patients with advanced PTS and iliac vein obstruction to reduce PTS symptoms and heal venous ulcers. (Class IIa; Level of Evidence C).
- Consider same regiment of anticoagulation for IFDVT patients without stents as recommended for venous stent placement. (Class IIa; Level of Evidence C).
- Consider an antiplatelet therapy with concomitant anticoagulation after venous stent placement, if the patient is at high risk of rethrombosis. (Class IIb; Level of Evidence C).
- Administer 30 - 40 mm Hg knee-high graduated ECS everyday for a minimum of 2 years in IFDVT. (Class I; Level of Evidence B).
- Administer of 30 - 40 mm Hg knee-high graduated ECS if prior IFDVT and a symptomatic PTS.(Class IIa; Level of Evidence C).
- Consider an intermittent sequential pneumatic compression followed by daily use of 30 - 40 mm Hg knee-high graduated ECS, in IFDVT and severe edema.(Class IIb; Level of Evidence B).
- Administer either intravenous UFH(Class I; Level of Evidence A), UFH by subcutaneous injection(Class I; Level of Evidence B), an LMWH (Class I; Level of Evidence A), or fondaparinux (Class I; Level of Evidence A) in the absence of suspected or proven heparin induced thrombocytopenia,in the patients suffering from IFDVT.
- Administer a direct thrombin inhibitor(Class I; Level of Evidence B) for IFDVT who have suspected or proven heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
- Administer IVC filter if acute proximal DVT (or acute PE) with contraindications to anticoagulation or if there is a presence of active bleeding complication (Class I; Level of Evidence B).
- Administer anticoagulation if contraindications to anticoagulation or active bleeding complications are resolved in the patient with IVC filter.(Class I; Level of Evidence B).
- Evaluate periodically for the filter retrieval according to the specific filter’s retrieval window, if retrievable IVC filter is administered. (Class I; Level of Evidence C).
- Consider to administer an IVC filter, in recurrent DVT (without PE) despite therapeutic anticoagulation(Class IIb; Level of Evidence C).
- Consider an IVC filter if PE occurs in spite of therapeutic anticoagulation. (Class IIa; Level of Evidence C).
- Consider a permanent nonretrievable IVC filter, in IFDVT patients who are likely to require permanent IVC filtration like, long-term contraindication to anticoagulation. (Class IIa; Level of Evidence C).
- If there is a short-term contraindication to anticoagulant therapy or a time-limited indication for an IVC filter, consider placement of a retrievable IVC filter for the IFDVT patients.(Class IIa; Level of Evidence C).
- Evaluate for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension if the patient presents with unexplained dyspnea, exercise intolerance, or clinical evidence of right-sided heart failure, irrespective of prior history of symptomatic VTE(Class I; Level of Evidence C).
- Do EKG 6 weeks after an acute PE to screen for persistent pulmonary hypertension which can predict the development of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. (Class IIa; Level of Evidence C).
- Use subcutaneous lowmolecular-weight heparin (LMWH), intravenous or subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (UFH) with monitoring, unmonitored weight-based subcutaneous UFH, or subcutaneous fondaparinux, if the patient is objectively confirmed to have PE and have no contraindications for anticoagulation.
- Use lepirudin, argatroban, or bivalirudin(a non– heparin-based anticoagulant), if the patient is suspected or diagnosed with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia(Class I; Level of Evidence A).
- Fibrinolytics are proven to be beneficial if there is an evidence of present or developing circulatory or respiratory insufficiency; or an evidence of moderate to severe RV injury.
- Evaluate chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension for pulmonary endarterectomy, irrespective of the symptos severity. (Class I; Level of Evidence B)
- Administer anticoagulants indefinitely when chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is diagnosed, and the contraindications for anticoagulation are absent. (Class I; Level of Evidence C)
Don'ts
- Do not administer IVC filter routinely in the treatment of IFDVT(Class III; Level of Evidence B).
References
- ↑ Miniati M, Cenci C, Monti S, Poli D (2012). "Clinical presentation of acute pulmonary embolism: survey of 800 cases". PLoS One. 7 (2): e30891. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030891. PMC 3288010. PMID 22383978.
- ↑ 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 Torbicki A, Perrier A, Konstantinides S, Agnelli G, Galiè N, Pruszczyk P; et al. (2008). "Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)". Eur Heart J. 29 (18): 2276–315. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn310. PMID 18757870.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 Jaff MR, McMurtry MS, Archer SL, Cushman M, Goldenberg N, Goldhaber SZ; et al. (2011). "Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association". Circulation. 123 (16): 1788–830. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e318214914f. PMID 21422387.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Cannon CP, Goldhaber SZ (1996). "Cardiovascular risk stratification of pulmonary embolism". Am. J. Cardiol. 78 (10): 1149–51. PMID 8914880. Retrieved 2011-12-21. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ, Prandoni P, Bounameaux H, Goldhaber SZ; et al. (2012). "Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines". Chest. 141 (2 Suppl): e419S–94S. doi:10.1378/chest.11-2301. PMC 3278049. PMID 22315268.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 Kucher N, Goldhaber SZ (2005). "Management of massive pulmonary embolism". Circulation. 112 (2): e28–32. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.551374. PMID 16009801.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 Cohen AT, Dobromirski M, Gurwith MM (2014). "Managing pulmonary embolism from presentation to extended treatment". Thromb Res. 133 (2): 139–48. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2013.09.040. PMID 24182642.