Acute liver failure surgery

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Acute liver failure Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Acute Liver Failure from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

X Ray

CT

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Acute liver failure surgery On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Acute liver failure surgery

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Acute liver failure surgery

CDC on Acute liver failure surgery

Acute liver failure surgery in the news

Blogs on Acute liver failure surgery

Directions to Hospitals Treating Acute liver failure

Risk calculators and risk factors for Acute liver failure surgery

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [2] Husnain Shaukat, M.D [3]

Overview

The candidates for liver transplantation should be identified as quickly as possible because the progression to multiorgan failure results in deterioration in many patients who are awaiting liver transplantation. While many people who develop acute liver failure recover with supportive treatment, liver transplantation is often required in people who continue to deteriorate or have poor prognostic factors. The patient's candidacy for liver transplantation should be assessed based on the patient's clinical scenario, as well as upon social and financial factors. Patient evaluation for liver transplantation should be done as soon as possible and before encephalopathy occurs. The key common feature among various prognostic evaluation systems is the presence of encephalopathy. Other common features are patient's age and severity of the liver injury which is assessed by coagulopathy or jaundice. To address the limitations, a wide variety of prognostic systems have been proposed but none has universal acceptance. King's college criteria is the most well-characterized evaluation system. Common absolute contraindications for liver transplantation include untreated sepsis, uncontrolled extra-hepatobiliary infection, alcohol abuse, uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disease, cholangiocarcinoma, metastatic malignancy to the liver and life-threatening systemic illness. Common postoperative complications for liver transplantation include infections, graft failure, vascular compromise, biliary stricture or stenosis, anastomosis leakage, thrombosis of hepatic artery and portal vein and depression.

Liver Transplantation

  • The candidates for liver transplantation should be identified as quickly as possible because the progression of multiorgan failure results in deterioration in many patients who are awaiting liver transplantation.[1][2]
  • While many people who develop acute liver failure recover with supportive treatment, liver transplantation is often required in people who continue to deteriorate or have poor prognostic factors.
  • The patient's candidacy for liver transplantation should be assessed based on the patient's clinical scenario, as well as upon social and financial factors. Patient evaluation for liver transplantation should be done as soon as possible and before encephalopathy occurs.[3]
  • The key common feature among various prognostic evaluation systems is the presence of encephalopathy. Other common features are patient's age and severity of the liver injury which is assessed by coagulopathy or jaundice. To address the limitations, a wide variety of prognostic systems have been proposed but none has universal acceptance. King's college criteria is the most well-characterized evaluation system.Ostapowicz G, Fontana RJ, Schiødt FV, Larson A, Davern TJ, Han SH, McCashland TM, Shakil AO, Hay JE, Hynan L, Crippin JS, Blei AT, Samuel G, Reisch J, Lee WM (2002). "Results of a prospective study of acute liver failure at 17 tertiary care centers in the United States". Ann. Intern. Med. 137 (12): 947–54. PMID 12484709.

King's College Criteria

  • The King’s College criteria are from O’Grady et al. The criteria were stratified into acetaminophen and non-acetaminophen causes of acute liver failure, due to the different mechanisms of damage correlating with prognosis in each of the causes.
King's College Hospital Criteria

for Liver Transplantation in Acute Liver Failure[4]

Acute Liver Failure with Acetaminophen Toxicity
Acute Liver Failure without Acetaminophen Toxicity

Prothrombin time >100 seconds or
Three of the following variables:

  • Age <10 yr or >40 yr
  • Cause:
    • Non-A, non-B hepatitis
    • Halothane hepatitis
    • Idiosyncratic drug reaction
  • Duration of jaundice before encephalopathy >7 days
  • Prothrombin time >50 seconds
  • Serum bilirubin level >17.6 mg/dL (>300 μmol/l)

Absolute contraindications for liver transplantation

  • Untreated sepsis
  • Uncontrolled extrahepatobillary infection
  • Alcohol abuse
  • Uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disease
  • Cholangiocarcinoma
  • Metastatic malignancy to the liver
  • Life-threatening systemic illness

Relative contraindications for liver transplantation

  • Age >70
  • Uncontrolled psychiatric disorder
  • Intrahepatic sepsis
  • HIV seropositivity with failure to control HIV viremia or CD4 <100/μL
  • Severe malnutrition/wasting
  • Portal vein thrombosis
  • Renal failure not attributable to liver disease
  • Severe hypoxemia secondary to right-to-left intrapulmonary shunts (Po2 <50 mmHg)

Common complications for liver transplantation

  • Infections
    • Bacterial: early, common postoperative infections
    • Fungal/parasitic: late, opportunistic infections
    • Viral: late, opportunistic infections, recurrent hepatitis
    • Infections from donor
  • Primary graft failure
  • vascular compromise
  • stricture, stenosis or leakage of the biliary anastomoses
  • Recurrence of primary hepatic disorder
  • Ischemic injury during harvesting
  • Portal vein obstruction
  • Hepatic artery thrombosis
  • Difficult psychosocial adjustment
  • Depression

References

  1. Ichai P, Samuel D (2008). "Etiology and prognosis of fulminant hepatitis in adults". Liver Transpl. 14 Suppl 2: S67–79. doi:10.1002/lt.21612. PMID 18825677.
  2. Craig DG, Bates CM, Davidson JS, Martin KG, Hayes PC, Simpson KJ (2012). "Staggered overdose pattern and delay to hospital presentation are associated with adverse outcomes following paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity". Br J Clin Pharmacol. 73 (2): 285–94. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04067.x. PMC 3269587. PMID 22106945.
  3. Ostapowicz G, Fontana RJ, Schiødt FV, Larson A, Davern TJ, Han SH, McCashland TM, Shakil AO, Hay JE, Hynan L, Crippin JS, Blei AT, Samuel G, Reisch J, Lee WM (2002). "Results of a prospective study of acute liver failure at 17 tertiary care centers in the United States". Annals of Internal Medicine. 137 (12): 947–54. PMID 12484709. Retrieved 2012-10-26. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  4. O'Grady JG, Alexander GJ, Hayllar KM, Williams R (1989). "Early indicators of prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure". Gastroenterology. 97 (2): 439–45. PMID 2490426.

Template:WH Template:WS