Atrial fibrillation maintenance of rate control and sinus rhythm
Resident Survival Guide |
Atrial Fibrillation Microchapters | |
Special Groups | |
---|---|
Diagnosis | |
Treatment | |
Cardioversion | |
Anticoagulation | |
Surgery | |
Case Studies | |
Atrial fibrillation maintenance of rate control and sinus rhythm On the Web | |
FDA on Atrial fibrillation maintenance of rate control and sinus rhythm | |
CDC on Atrial fibrillation maintenance of rate control and sinus rhythm | |
Atrial fibrillation maintenance of rate control and sinus rhythm in the news | |
Blogs on Atrial fibrillation maintenance of rate control and sinus rhythm | |
Directions to Hospitals Treating Atrial fibrillation maintenance of rate control and sinus rhythm | |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mitra Chitsazan, M.D.[2] Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [3]; Varun Kumar, M.B.B.S.
Overview
Maintenance of sinus rhythm could be reached by using anti-arrhythmic drug therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and it is specially recommended in symptomatic patients. There are six anti-arrhythmic drugs recommended and available for sinus rhythm maintannace in atrial fibrillation (AF). Choosing the proper anti-arrhythmic drug based on patient's underlying diseases and possible side effects is critical. Moreover, all of the anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) should be discontinued if a patient's (atrial fibrillation (AF) becomes permanent. Catheter-based ablation is an alternative to anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) therapy that could be considered as a first-line option at experienced centers.
Maintenance of Sinus Rate
Lifestyle interventions
Wieght loss may help[1].
Medications
- Anti-arrhythmic drug therapy could be useful to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation. Although in general rhythm control does not produce better outcomes, compared to rate control in terms of stroke or mortality, it is still one of the main treatments. Nevertheless, a rhythm control approach may be favored if the patient is highly symptomatic, or hemodynamically unstable (often seen in congestive heart failure patients due to loss of the atrial kick in atrial fibrillation (AF)).
- There are six anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) recommended for atrial fibrillation (AF).[2]
- Flecainide and propafenone are class Ic anti-arrhythmics.
- Dofetilide, sotalol, dronedarone, and amiodarone are class III antiarrhythmics.
- Other anti-arrhythmic drugs (lidocaine, quinidine, etc) are not recommended.
- It is recommended to select anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs), based on a patient's underlying heart issues (if any).
- In patients with no structural heart disease (no CAD and no CHF), any of the six listed anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) is reasonable.
- Given the toxicities of amiodarone and concerns about its long term use, amiodarone is not recommended for first-line therapy. It should be used only if other agents have failed or are contraindicated.[2][3] It should be used only if other agents have failed or are contraindicated.
- The class Ic AADs (flecainide and propafenone) are contraindicated in patients who are suffering from Coronary heart disease. Class Ic AADs have been found to cause increased death and cardiac arrest in patients post-MI.[4]
- Flecainide, propafenone, dofetilide, and sotalol are not recommended for patients with severe left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).
- In patients with CHF, amiodarone and dofetilide are recommended.
- All of these drugs carry a risk of pro-arrhythmia. Dofetilide and sotalol particularly prolong the QT interval and increase risk of Torsade de pointes. Hence, these drugs must initiated in the hospital to allow for careful monitoring of the QT interval.
- anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) therapy does not obviate the need for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients.
Ablation
- Catheter-based ablation is an alternative to anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) therapy that should be considered as a first-line option at experienced centers [2] per the 2014 AHA guidelines.
- Surgical atrial fibrillation ablation can be considered if the patient needs cardiac surgery for another reason, or as a last recourse if other options have failed.
- All of the anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) should be discontinued if a patient's (atrial fibrillation (AF) becomes permanent.
2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (DO NOT EDIT)[5]
Rhythm Control
Antiarrhythmic Drugs to Maintain Sinus Rhythm
Class I |
"1. Before initiating antiarrhythmic drug therapy, treatment of precipitating or reversible causes of AF is recommended. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
"2. The following antiarrhythmic drugs are recommended in patients with AF to maintain sinus rhythm, depending on underlying heart disease and comorbidities: a. Amiodarone, b. Dofetilide, c. Dronedarone, d. Flecainide, e. Propafenone, f. Sotalol. (Level of Evidence: A)" |
"3. The risks of the antiarrhythmic drug, including proarrhythmia, should be considered before initiating therapy with each drug. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
"4. Owing to its potential toxicities, amiodarone should only be used after consideration of risks and when other agents have failed or are contraindicated. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
Class III: Harm |
"1. Antiarrhythmic drugs for rhythm control should not be continued when AF becomes permanent (Level of Evidence: C) including dronedarone. (Level of Evidence: B)" |
"2. Dronedarone should not be used for treatment of AF in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV HF or patients who have had an episode of decompensated HF in the past 4 weeks. (Level of Evidence: B)" |
Class IIa |
"1. A rhythm-control strategy with pharmacological therapy can be useful in patients with AF for the treatment of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
Class IIb |
"1. It may be reasonable to continue current antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the setting of infrequent, well-tolerated recurrences of AF, when the drug has reduced the frequency or symptoms of AF. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
AF Catheter Ablation to Maintain Sinus Rhythm
Class I |
"1. AF catheter ablation is useful for symptomatic paroxysmal AF refractory or intolerant to at least 1 class I or III antiarrhythmic medication when a rhythm control strategy is desired. (Level of Evidence: A)" |
"2. Prior to consideration of AF catheter ablation, assessment of the procedural risks and outcomes relevant to the individual patient is recommended. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
Class III: Harm |
"1. AF catheter ablation should not be performed in patients who cannot be treated with anticoagulant therapy during and following the procedure. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
"2. AF catheter ablation to restore sinus rhythm should not be performed with the sole intent of obviating the need for anticoagulation. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
Class IIa |
"1. AF catheter ablation is reasonable for selected patients with symptomatic persistent AF refractory or intolerant to at least 1 class I or III antiarrhythmic medication. (Level of Evidence: A)" |
"2. In patients with recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal AF, catheter ablation is a reasonable initial rhythm control strategy prior to therapeutic trials of antiarrhythmic drug therapy, after weighing risks and outcomes of drug and ablation therapy. (Level of Evidence: B)" |
Class IIb |
"1. AF catheter ablation may be considered for symptomatic long-standing (>12 months) persistent AF refractory or intolerant to at least 1 class I or III antiarrhythmic medication, when a rhythm control strategy is desired. (Level of Evidence: B)" |
"2. AF catheter ablation may be considered prior to initiation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with a class I or III antiarrhythmic medication for symptomatic persistent AF, when a rhythm control strategy is desired. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
Pharmacological Agents for Preventing AF and Maintaining Sinus Rhythm
Therapies to maintain sinus rhythm | ||||
Treatment | Efficacy | Adverse effects | Contraindications | Precausions |
Drug therapy | ||||
Beta-blockers |
|
|
|
|
Nondihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers: |
|
|
|
|
Flecainide |
|
|
|
|
Propafenone |
|
|
|
|
Quinidine |
|
|
|
|
Disopyramide |
|
|
|
|
Dronendrone |
|
|
|
|
Dofetilide |
|
|
|
|
Sotalol |
|
|
|
|
Amiodarone |
|
|
|
|
Interventional procedures | ||||
Catheter ablation |
|
|
|
|
Surgery (Maze procedure) |
|
|
|
|
Sources
- ACCF/AHA/HRS 2011 Focused Updates Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation[6]
- ACCF/ACG/AHA 2010 Expert Consensus Document on the Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Thienopyridines[7]
- ACC/AHA/Physician Consortium 2008 Clinical Performance Measures for Adults With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation or Atrial Flutter[8]
References
- ↑ Pathak RK, Middeldorp ME, Meredith M, Mehta AB, Mahajan R, Wong CX; et al. (2015). "Long-Term Effect of Goal-Directed Weight Management in an Atrial Fibrillation Cohort: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study (LEGACY)". J Am Coll Cardiol. 65 (20): 2159–69. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.002. PMID 25792361.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Craig T. January, MD, PhD, FACC; L. Samuel Wann, MD, MACC, FAHA; Joseph S. Alpert, MD, FACC, FAHA; Hugh Calkins, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS; Joaquin E. Cigarroa, MD, FACC; Joseph C. Cleveland, Jr., MD, FACC; Jamie B. Conti, MD, FACC, FHRS; Patrick T. Ellinor, MD, PhD, FAHA; Michael D. Ezekowitz, MB, ChB, FACC, FAHA; Michael E. Field, MD, FACC, FHRS; Katherine T. Murray, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS; Ralph L. Sacco, MD, FAHA; William G. Stevenson, MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS; Patrick J. Tchou, MD, FACC; Cynthia M. Tracy, MD, FACC, FAHA; Clyde W. Yancy, MD, FACC, FAHA. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Executive SummaryA Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(21):2246-2280
- ↑ Dingxin Qin, George Leef, Mian Bilal Alam, Rohit Rattan, Mohamad Bilal Munir, Divyang Patel, Furqan Khattak, Evan Adelstein, Sandeep K. Jain, Samir Saba. Mortality risk of long-term amiodarone therapy for atrial fibrillation patients without structural heart disease. Cardiology Journal 2015;22(6):622-629.
- ↑ Echt et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo: the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial. NEJM 1991; 324(12): 781-788.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 January, C. T.; Wann, L. S.; Alpert, J. S.; Calkins, H.; Cleveland, J. C.; Cigarroa, J. E.; Conti, J. B.; Ellinor, P. T.; Ezekowitz, M. D.; Field, M. E.; Murray, K. T.; Sacco, R. L.; Stevenson, W. G.; Tchou, P. J.; Tracy, C. M.; Yancy, C. W. (2014). "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society". Circulation. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000041. ISSN 0009-7322.
- ↑ Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA et al. (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation 123 (10):e269-367. DOI:10.1161/CIR.0b013e318214876d PMID: 21382897
- ↑ Abraham NS, Hlatky MA, Antman EM, Bhatt DL, Bjorkman DJ, Clark CB; et al. (2010). "ACCF/ACG/AHA 2010 Expert Consensus Document on the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and thienopyridines: a focused update of the ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 expert consensus document on reducing the gastrointestinal risks of antiplatelet therapy and NSAID use: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents". Circulation. 122 (24): 2619–33. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e318202f701. PMID 21060077.
- ↑ Estes NA, Halperin JL, Calkins H, Ezekowitz MD, Gitman P, Go AS et al. (2008) ACC/AHA/Physician Consortium 2008 clinical performance measures for adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and the Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement (Writing Committee to Develop Clinical Performance Measures for Atrial Fibrillation): developed in collaboration with the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 117 (8):1101-20. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187192 PMID: 18283199
- ↑ Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA et al. (2006) ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 114 (7):e257-354. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.177292 PMID: 16908781