Duplessis Orphans

Jump to navigation Jump to search

WikiDoc Resources for Duplessis Orphans

Articles

Most recent articles on Duplessis Orphans

Most cited articles on Duplessis Orphans

Review articles on Duplessis Orphans

Articles on Duplessis Orphans in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ

Media

Powerpoint slides on Duplessis Orphans

Images of Duplessis Orphans

Photos of Duplessis Orphans

Podcasts & MP3s on Duplessis Orphans

Videos on Duplessis Orphans

Evidence Based Medicine

Cochrane Collaboration on Duplessis Orphans

Bandolier on Duplessis Orphans

TRIP on Duplessis Orphans

Clinical Trials

Ongoing Trials on Duplessis Orphans at Clinical Trials.gov

Trial results on Duplessis Orphans

Clinical Trials on Duplessis Orphans at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Duplessis Orphans

NICE Guidance on Duplessis Orphans

NHS PRODIGY Guidance

FDA on Duplessis Orphans

CDC on Duplessis Orphans

Books

Books on Duplessis Orphans

News

Duplessis Orphans in the news

Be alerted to news on Duplessis Orphans

News trends on Duplessis Orphans

Commentary

Blogs on Duplessis Orphans

Definitions

Definitions of Duplessis Orphans

Patient Resources / Community

Patient resources on Duplessis Orphans

Discussion groups on Duplessis Orphans

Patient Handouts on Duplessis Orphans

Directions to Hospitals Treating Duplessis Orphans

Risk calculators and risk factors for Duplessis Orphans

Healthcare Provider Resources

Symptoms of Duplessis Orphans

Causes & Risk Factors for Duplessis Orphans

Diagnostic studies for Duplessis Orphans

Treatment of Duplessis Orphans

Continuing Medical Education (CME)

CME Programs on Duplessis Orphans

International

Duplessis Orphans en Espanol

Duplessis Orphans en Francais

Business

Duplessis Orphans in the Marketplace

Patents on Duplessis Orphans

Experimental / Informatics

List of terms related to Duplessis Orphans

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [4]

Overview

The Duplessis Orphans (French: les Orphelins de Duplessis) were the victims of a scheme in which several thousand orphaned children were falsely certified as mentally ill by the government of the province of Quebec, Canada and confined to psychiatric institutions. [1][2]

Orphanages and schools were the financial responsibility of the provincial government but funding for mental institutions was also provided by the government of Canada. Beginning in the 1940s and continuing into the 1960s, Quebec Premier Maurice Duplessis in cooperation with the Roman Catholic Church which ran the orphanages, developed a scheme to obtain Federal funding for thousands of children, most of whom had been orphaned through their abandonment by an unwed mother. In some cases the Catholic orphanages were relabelled as health-care facilities and in other cases the children were shipped from orphanages to existing insane asylums. Years later, long after these institutions were closed, the children who had survived them and become adults began to speak out about the harsh treatment and sexual abuse they were forced to endure at the hands of the psychiatrists, Roman Catholic Church priests, nuns, and administrators. Reminiscent of the abuses by the Catholic-run Magdalen Asylums, members of the Duplessis Orphans claim that they were used as slave labor and subjected to medical experimentation and extreme physical abuse for misbehaviour.

Legal Recourse in the 1990s

By the 1990s, there remained about 3000 survivors and a large group formed to start a campaign. They called themselves the Duplessis Orphans after Maurice Duplessis, the premier of the province during that time whose government was responsible for their plight. In addition to government and Church responsibility, the College of Physicians of Quebec came under fire after some of the orphans found copies of their medical records that had been falsified. Labelled as mentally deficient, many of these children were subjected to a variety of drug testing and used in other medical experiments. Released upon reaching the legal age of maturity, they were uneducated and ill-equipped to cope with life as adults. Suicides were not uncommon, and, tormented as a result of their treatment, crime and other dysfunctional conduct and disabilities permeated them.

At first, the government of Quebec stonewalled them, but after they started gaining widespread publicity in March of 1999, the Parti Québécois government made a token offer of approximately $1,000 as full compensation to each of the victims. The offer was rejected and the government was harshly criticized by the public and even the provincial Ombudsman, Daniel Jacoby, came out saying that the government's handling of the situation had trivialized the abuse the victims alleged. Nevertheless, the Quebec government of Lucien Bouchard still refused to hold an inquiry and get to the bottom of the scandal. In 2001, the claimants received an increased offer from the Quebec government for a flat payment of $10,000 per person, plus an additional $1,000 for each year of wrongful confinement to a mental institution. The offer amounted to approximately $15,000 per orphan, however it was limited to each of the surviving 1,100 orphans the government had labeled as mentally deficient, but did not include any compensation for victims of sexual or other abuse. Faced with few choices, the offer was accepted by those eligible while the remainder received nothing. The vote on the offer was taken by a show of hands in a closed-door session overseen by Committee chief, the author Bruno Roy, one of very few orphans who enjoyed a successful career following the traumatic experience of youth detention. The results of the vote were later bitterly contested by a group which believed the victims should have received more.[3] Many believe that justice was not done and criminal wrongdoing was allowed to go unpunished. Opponents of the judgment led by Rod Vienneau of Joliette, Quebec pointed out that bureaucrats processing the applications for compensation were in many cases being paid over $1,000 per day of work,[4] whereas the orphans themselves received the same amount for an entire year of their childhood confined illegally to insane asylums. Also contentious is the fact that the Duplessis Orphan Committee's lawyer and PR agent Carlo Tarini are believed to have earned several millions in compensation for their work whereas the actual victims no received more than $15,000 each.

Fate of the Remains

In 1942, the Legislative Assembly of Quebec passed into law an Act that allowed the Roman Catholic Church to sell the unclaimed body of any orphan to medical schools. This practise of selling orphans' remains continued into the 1960s. In 2004, members of the "Duplessis Orphans" asked the Quebec government to unearth an abandoned cemetery in the east end of Montreal which they believe holds the remains of orphans who may have been the subject of medical experiments. According to testimony by individuals who were at the Cite de St. Jean de Dieu insane asylum, now named Louis-Hippolyte Lafontaine Hospital, the orphans were routinely experimented upon and many died. The group wants the government to exhume the bodies in order that autopsies can be done.

References

  1. [1] 'The Duplessis Orphans' CBC Archives
  2. [2]
  3. Montréal Mirror.
  4. [3]

lt:Duplesio našlaičiai

Template:WH Template:WS