Empyema medical therapy
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Empyema Microchapters |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Prince Tano Djan, BSc, MBChB [2]
Overview
The mainstay of therapy for empyema includes:[1] controlling the infectious focus, drainage of fluid and pus, re-expansion of the lung. This involes the use of antimicrobial agents, thrombolytics,[2][3] and drainage of the pleural space.[4][5][6] Pharmacologic therapies for acute empyema include either Ceftriaxone, Nafcillin or Oxacillin, Vancomycin or Linezolid, or TMP-SMX. The preferred regimen for subacute and chronic empyema is a combination of Clindamycin and Ceftriaxone.
Medical Therapy
Therapy focuses on the following:[1]
- Controlling the infectious focus
- Drainage of fluid and pus
- Re-expansion of the lung
Pharmacotherapy
Acute Pharmacotherapies
- Appropriate antibiotics are indicated in all patients with an underlying infection. Drainage of the pleural space should be considered early, as delay of even a few days is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality.
- Indications for chest tube drainage include:[4][5][6] a pH < 7.0, glucose < 40-50, gross pus, or organisms on Gram’s stain.
- In borderline cases, reassessment with a repeat tap should be preformed in 12 – 24 hours. If the LDH is increasing, and the pH and glucose are decreasing, a chest tube should be placed immediately.
- The chest tube should be at least a 28 F (smaller tubes become obstructed with fibrin clot), and left in place until the drainage is clear and yellow, and its volume is < 50 cc/day.
- Patients will get better within 24 – 48 hours. If they don’t, suspect inadequate drainage due to loculations or inappropriate antibiotics.
- Thrombolytics (mainly Urokinase and Streptokinase) have been used to break up loculations and assist drainage.[2][3]
- The typical Streptokinase (SK) dose is 250,000 units in 30 – 100 cc normal saline solution (NS), and the typical Urokinase dose in 100,000 units, also in 30 – 60 cc NS. They are instilled via the chest tube, left in place for 1-4 hours (chest tube clamped), and repeated daily as needed.
- Two randomized studies comparing SK to chest tube drainage alone have shown an increase in the amount of drainage, however a statistical difference in the resolution of white blood cell (WBC) count and fever, the need for surgical drainage, or the duration of hospitalization has not been demonstrated.
- The typical Streptokinase (SK) dose is 250,000 units in 30 – 100 cc normal saline solution (NS), and the typical Urokinase dose in 100,000 units, also in 30 – 60 cc NS. They are instilled via the chest tube, left in place for 1-4 hours (chest tube clamped), and repeated daily as needed.
- More recently, however, VATS (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) has been compared to treatment by treatment with SK and chest tube drainage (SK-CT) in randomized trials.[1]
- Wait et.al. studied 20 patients and found that VATS was associated with a significantly higher primary treatment success (91% vs. 44%), lower chest tube duration (6 days vs. 10 days) and a lower number of hospital days (9 vs. 13). VATS was also associated with a non-significant trend towards lower hospital costs.
- They felt that SK-CT only delayed, and did not prevent definitive treatment with VATS.
- It should be noted, however, that the patients in Wait’s study had fibrinopurulent empyema, and not simple parapneumonic effusions or chronic empyema.
- Wait et.al. studied 20 patients and found that VATS was associated with a significantly higher primary treatment success (91% vs. 44%), lower chest tube duration (6 days vs. 10 days) and a lower number of hospital days (9 vs. 13). VATS was also associated with a non-significant trend towards lower hospital costs.
- Obviously, the definitive answer is still out on the optimal management of empyema, however, the above data may indicate a more aggressive approach in these patients.
- Indications for chest tube drainage include:[4][5][6] a pH < 7.0, glucose < 40-50, gross pus, or organisms on Gram’s stain.
Antibiotics
- Empyema[7]
- 1. Empiric antimicrobial therapy or culture negative therapy
- Causative pathogens:
- Streptococcus milleri
- Streptococcus pneumoniae
- Streptococcus intermedius
- Staphylococcus aureus
- Enterobacteriaceae
- Escherichia coli
- Fusobacterium spp.
- Bacteroides spp.
- Peptostreptococcus spp.
- Preferred regimen (1): Cefuroxime 1.5 g IV q8h AND Metronidazole 500 mg IV q8h
- Preferred regimen (2): Ceftriaxone 1.5 g IV q8h AND Metronidazole 500 mg IV q8h
- Preferred regimen (3): Piperacillin-Tazobactam 3.375 g IV q4h OR Ticarcillin-clavulanate 3.1 g IV q4h OR Ampicillin-Sulbactam 2/1 g IV q6h
- Preferred regimen (4): Meropenem 1 g IV q8h OR Imipenem 500 mg IV q6h
- Note: Consider coverage for MRSA if high suspicion exists.
- 2. Pathogen-based therapy
- 2.1 Acute empyema
- 2.1.1 Streptococcus pneumoniae, Group A streptrococcus
- Preferred regimen: Ceftriaxone 1.5 g IV/IM q24h
- 2.1.2 Staphylococcus aureus
- 2.1.2.1 MSSA
- 2.1.2.2 MRSA
- Preferred regimen: Vancomycin 1 g IV q12h OR Linezolid 600 mg PO/IV q12h
- 2.1.3 Hemophilus influenzae
- Preferred regimen: Ceftriaxone 1.5 g IV/IM q24h
- Alternative regimen: Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole 8-20 mg TMP/kg/day IV q6-12h or Ampicillin-Sulbactam 2/1 g IV q6h
- 2.2 Subacute/chronic empyema
- 2.2.1 Anaerobic streptococcus, Streptococcus milleri, Bacteroides species, Enterobacteriaceae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis
- Preferred regimen: Clindamycin 450–900 mg IV q8h AND Ceftriaxone 1.5 g IV/IM q24h
- Alternative regimen: Imipenem 500 mg IV q6h OR Piperacillin-Tazobactam 3.375 g IV q4h OR Ticarcillin-clavulanate 3.1 g IV q4h OR Ampicillin-Sulbactam 2/1 g IV q6h
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Reichert M, Hecker M, Witte B, Bodner J, Padberg W, Weigand MA; et al. (2016). "Stage-directed therapy of pleural empyema". Langenbecks Arch Surg. doi:10.1007/s00423-016-1498-9. PMID 27815709.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Porcel JM, Valencia H, Bielsa S (2016). "Manual Intrapleural Saline Flushing Plus Urokinase: A Potentially Useful Therapy for Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions and Empyemas". Lung. doi:10.1007/s00408-016-9964-2. PMID 27866276.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Rahman NM, Maskell NA, West A, Teoh R, Arnold A, Mackinlay C; et al. (2011). "Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection". N Engl J Med. 365 (6): 518–26. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1012740. PMID 21830966. Review in: Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):JC6-9
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Ashbaugh DG (1991). "Empyema thoracis. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality". Chest. 99 (5): 1162–5. PMID 2019172.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Light RW (1995). "A new classification of parapneumonic effusions and empyema". Chest. 108 (2): 299–301. PMID 7634854.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Colice GL, Curtis A, Deslauriers J, Heffner J, Light R, Littenberg B; et al. (2000). "Medical and surgical treatment of parapneumonic effusions : an evidence-based guideline". Chest. 118 (4): 1158–71. PMID 11035692.
- ↑ LastName, FirstName (2007). Sanford guide to antimicrobial therapy. Place of publication not identified: Antimicrobial Therapy. ISBN 9781930808386.