Fournier gangrene surgery

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fournier gangrene Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Fournier gangrene from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Lupus and Quality of Life

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Fournier gangrene surgery On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Fournier gangrene surgery

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Fournier gangrene surgery

on Fournier gangrene surgery

Fournier gangrene surgery in the news

Blogs onFournier gangrene surgery

Directions to Hospitals Treating Fournier gangrene

Risk calculators and risk factors for Fournier gangrene surgery

Steven C. Campbell, M.D., Ph.D.; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yamuna Kondapally, M.B.B.S[1]; Jesus Rosario Hernandez, M.D. [2]

Overview

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for Fournier gangrene.[1]. As the patients are cardiovascularly unstable, immediate resuscitation with intravenous fluids, colloids and inotropic agents are usually necessary.[2]

Surgery

Radical surgical debridement

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for Fournier gangrene.[1]

  • Indications include:[1]

Procedure

  • Radical debridement of areas of overt subcutaneous necrosis should be done in the operation theater in the lithotomy position to allow access to all perineal structures.
  • Deep fascia and muscle are rarely involved, thus debridement is usually not required.
  • Separation of the skin and subcutaneous tissue with a hemostat has been recommended to define the limits of excision. Debridement is stopped where these tissues do not separate easily.

Fecal and urinary diversion

  • Urinary or fecal diversion is required to treat an underlying condition or prevent wound contamination.[5]
  • When there is gross urinary extravasation or periurethral inflammation, suprapubic cystostomy is required. A urinary catheter is used in milder cases.
  • Colostomy is required when there is gross sphincter infection or colonic or rectal perforation.
  • Testes are temporarily implanted into subcutaneous tissue pouch (medial thigh or lower abdomen) until healing or reconstruction is complete.
  • Orchidectomy is performed if there is any pre-existing epididymo-orchitis or scrotal abscess.

Plastic reconstruction

  • The split thickness skin graft is a commonly used technique for reconstructive surgery. For large defects, rotational or free myocutaneous flaps and omental flaps are used to cover larger defects.[5]

Wound management

  • The wound is monitored closely after surgery.
  • Multiple surgical debridement are required with an average of 3.5 procedures per patient.[6]
  • Sodium hypochlorite or hydrogen peroxide are used post-operatively for topical application.[7]
  • Lyophilized collagenase (an enzyme that digests and debrides necrotic tissues) is used for enzymatic debridement twice daily until definite reconstruction can be performed.[8]

Vacuum-assisted closure device
The vacuum assisted closure device is used for faster and effective wound closure.[9][1] This devices helps wound healing by absorbing excess exudates, reducing localized edema, and finally drawing wound edges together.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Misiakos EP, Bagias G, Patapis P, Sotiropoulos D, Kanavidis P, Machairas A (2014). "Current concepts in the management of necrotizing fasciitis". Front Surg. 1: 36. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2014.00036. PMC 4286984. PMID 25593960.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Baxter F, McChesney J (2000). "Severe group A streptococcal infection and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome". Can J Anaesth. 47 (11): 1129–40. doi:10.1007/BF03027968. PMID 11097546.
  3. Roje Z, Roje Z, Matić D, Librenjak D, Dokuzović S, Varvodić J (2011). "Necrotizing fasciitis: literature review of contemporary strategies for diagnosing and management with three case reports: torso, abdominal wall, upper and lower limbs". World J Emerg Surg. 6 (1): 46. doi:10.1186/1749-7922-6-46. PMC 3310784. PMID 22196774.
  4. Mok MY, Wong SY, Chan TM, Tang WM, Wong WS, Lau CS (2006). "Necrotizing fasciitis in rheumatic diseases". Lupus. 15 (6): 380–3. PMID 16830885.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Paty R, Smith AD (1992). "Gangrene and Fournier's gangrene". Urol Clin North Am. 19 (1): 149–62. PMID 1736475.
  6. Chawla SN, Gallop C, Mydlo JH (2003). "Fournier's gangrene: an analysis of repeated surgical debridement". Eur Urol. 43 (5): 572–5. PMID 12706005.
  7. Hejase MJ, Simonin JE, Bihrle R, Coogan CL (1996). "Genital Fournier's gangrene: experience with 38 patients". Urology. 47 (5): 734–9. PMID 8650874.
  8. Aşci R, Sarikaya S, Büyükalpelli R, Yilmaz AF, Yildiz S (1998). "Fournier's gangrene: risk assessment and enzymatic debridement with lyophilized collagenase application". Eur Urol. 34 (5): 411–8. PMID 9803004.
  9. Silberstein J, Grabowski J, Parsons JK (2008). "Use of a Vacuum-Assisted Device for Fournier's Gangrene: A New Paradigm". Rev Urol. 10 (1): 76–80. PMC 2312348. PMID 18470279.