Incidentaloma other imaging findings

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Incidentaloma Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Incidentaloma from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Incidentaloma other imaging findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Incidentaloma other imaging findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Incidentaloma other imaging findings

CDC on Incidentaloma other imaging findings

Incidentaloma other imaging findings in the news

Blogs on Incidentaloma other imaging findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Psoriasis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Incidentaloma other imaging findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohammed Abdelwahed M.D[2]

Overview

Findings on a Positron Emission Tomography (PET-CT) scan suggestive of diagnostic of incidentaloma. Cancer cells have an increased requirement for glucose and take up more glucose and deoxyglucose than normal cells. Standard uptake value (SUV) values have been utilized to differentiate between benign and malignant adrenal lesions. It may be helpful in the diagnosis of incidentaloma in selected patients; those with a history of malignancy or those in which CT densitometry or washout analysis is inconclusive or suspicious for malignancy because of their high sensitivity for detecting malignancy.

Other Imaging Findings

  • FDG-PET is a nuclear medicine modality that provides quantitative tomographic images after intravenous injection of a beta-radiation-emitting radiotracer (18-Fluorine) used to label 2-deoxy-d-glucose rendering fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG).[1]
  • Glucose and deoxyglucose enter cells via cell glucose transporters and undergo phosphorylation. When glucose undergoes further enzymatic breakdown, deoxyglucose is trapped in the intra-cellular compartments.
  • Cancer cells have an increased requirement for glucose and take up more glucose and deoxyglucose than normal cells.[2]
  • SUV values have been utilized to differentiate between benign and malignant adrenal lesions.
  • It may be helpful in the diagnosis of incidentaloma in selected patients; those with a history of malignancy or those in which CT densitometry or washout analysis is inconclusive or suspicious for malignancy because of their high sensitivity for detecting malignancy.[3]
  • 18F-FDG is not a specific marker for cancer cells but a marker only for increased glucose metabolism so the uptake can also be increased in cells with an increased energy requirement due to conditions other than cancer.[4]
PET-CT shows intense hypermetabolic lesion (SUVmax 6.3), source: Case courtesy of Dr Anna Margherita Maffione, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 33259


References

  1. Groussin L, Bonardel G, Silvéra S, Tissier F, Coste J, Abiven G; et al. (2009). "18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of adrenocortical tumors: a prospective study in 77 operated patients". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 94 (5): 1713–22. doi:10.1210/jc.2008-2302. PMID 19190108.
  2. Becherer A, Vierhapper H, Pötzi C, Karanikas G, Kurtaran A, Schmaljohann J; et al. (2001). "FDG-PET in adrenocortical carcinoma". Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 16 (4): 289–95. doi:10.1089/108497801753131363. PMID 11602999.
  3. Young WF (2007). "Clinical practice. The incidentally discovered adrenal mass". N Engl J Med. 356 (6): 601–10. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp065470. PMID 17287480.
  4. Terzolo M, Stigliano A, Chiodini I, Loli P, Furlani L, Arnaldi G; et al. (2011). "AME position statement on adrenal incidentaloma". Eur J Endocrinol. 164 (6): 851–70. doi:10.1530/EJE-10-1147. PMID 21471169.

Template:WH Template:WS