Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis surgery

Jump to navigation Jump to search

non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Differentiating non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Interventions

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis surgery On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis surgery

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis surgery

CDC on Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis surgery

Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis surgery in the news

Blogs on Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis surgery

Directions to Hospitals Treating Psoriasis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis surgery

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aisha Adigun, B.Sc., M.D.[2]

Overview

Surgery is not the first-line treatment option for patients with non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis and is usually reserved for patients with either heart failure, acute valve rupture, or recurrence of thromboembolism despite adequate anticoagulation. It is important to weigh the risks associated with the patient's underlying condition with the benefits of surgery.

Indications

  • Surgery is not the first-line treatment option for patients with non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis[1].
  • Surgery to replace or repair the valve is usually reserved for patients with either heart failure, acute valve rupture, or recurrence of thromboembolism despite adequate anticoagulation[2].
  • Mitral valve replacement surgery has an operative mortality of as high as 25% in patients with Libman-Sacks endocarditis.
  • The main reason for surgery in NBTE is the prevention of recurrent thromboembolism.
  • As opposed to infective endocarditis where the entire valve may need to be removed, valve preservation is possible in NBTE[3].
  • When considering surgery as an option, it is important to weigh the risks associated with the patient's underlying condition with the benefits of surgery[4].

References

  1. Roldan CA, Shively BK, Crawford MH (November 1996). "An echocardiographic study of valvular heart disease associated with systemic lupus erythematosus". N. Engl. J. Med. 335 (19): 1424–30. doi:10.1056/NEJM199611073351903. PMID 8875919.
  2. Rabinstein AA, Giovanelli C, Romano JG, Koch S, Forteza AM, Ricci M (March 2005). "Surgical treatment of nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis presenting with stroke". J. Neurol. 252 (3): 352–5. doi:10.1007/s00415-005-0660-z. PMID 15726268.
  3. "Non-bacterial Thrombotic Endocarditis | IntechOpen".
  4. Aryana A, Esterbrooks DJ, Morris PC (December 2006). "Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis with recurrent embolic events as manifestation of ovarian neoplasm". J Gen Intern Med. 21 (12): C12–5. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00614.x. PMC 1924740. PMID 16965557.

Template:WH Template:WS