Pulseless electrical activity natural history, complications and prognosis

Jump to navigation Jump to search


Resident
Survival
Guide

Pulseless electrical activity Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Pulseless Electrical Activity from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-Ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Pulseless electrical activity natural history, complications and prognosis On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Pulseless electrical activity natural history, complications and prognosis

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Pulseless electrical activity natural history, complications and prognosis

CDC on Pulseless electrical activity natural history, complications and prognosis

Pulseless electrical activity natural history, complications and prognosis in the news

Blogs on Pulseless electrical activity natural history, complications and prognosis

Directions to Hospitals Treating Pulseless electrical activity

Risk calculators and risk factors for Pulseless electrical activity natural history, complications and prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Karol Gema Hernandez, M.D. [2]

Overview

PEA is associated with a poor prognosis, particularly if the underlying cause is not readily identified and treated. The presence of a QRS interval > 0.20 seconds is associated with a poorer prognosis. The survival of patients with PEA as a presenting rhythm for sudden cardiac arrest is poorer than ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation.[1]

Natural History

  • The symptoms of (disease name) usually develop in the first/ second/ third decade of life, and start with symptoms such as ___.
  • The symptoms of (disease name) typically develop ___ years after exposure to ___.
  • If left untreated, [#]% of patients with [disease name] may progress to develop [manifestation 1], [manifestation 2], and [manifestation 3].

Complications

  • Common complications of [disease name] include:
    • [Complication 1]
    • [Complication 2]
    • [Complication 3]

Prognosis

  • Prognosis is generally poor, and the 1/5/10-year mortality/survival rate of patients with [disease name] is approximately [--]%.
  • Depending on the extent of the [tumor/disease progression] at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary. However, the prognosis is generally regarded as poor/good/excellent.
  • The presence of [characteristic of disease] is associated with a particularly [good/poor] prognosis among patients with [disease/malignancy].
  • The prognosis varies with the [characteristic] of tumor; [subtype of disease/malignancy] have the most favorable prognosis.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

  • The survival of patients with out of hospital occurrence of PEA is 19.5% compared to 11.2% among patients with in hospital PEA, likely due to the higher incidence of reversible causes among patients with out of hospital arrest.[1][2][3]
  • Among 11,963 patients with PEA, only 11% survived, 62% of which had good neurological outcomes.[4]
  • According to the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium, the survival of patients with SCA during hospitalization is 8% among subjects with PEA compared to 30.5% for subjects with VT or VF; therefore, strategies for improving survival after PEA due to SCA should be implemented.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Meaney PA, Nadkarni VM, Kern KB, Indik JH, Halperin HR, Berg RA (2010). "Rhythms and outcomes of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest". Critical Care Medicine. 38 (1): 101–8. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b43282. PMID 19770741. Retrieved 2012-09-16. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. Thomas AJ, Newgard CD, Fu R, Zive DM, Daya MR (September 2013). "Survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests with initial asystole or pulseless electrical activity and subsequent shockable rhythms". Resuscitation. 84 (9): 1261–6. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.02.016. PMC 3947599. PMID 23454257.
  3. Teodorescu C, Reinier K, Uy-Evanado A, Ayala J, Mariani R, Wittwer L, Gunson K, Jui J, Chugh SS (September 2012). "Survival advantage from ventricular fibrillation and pulseless electrical activity in women compared to men: the Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study". J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 34 (3): 219–25. doi:10.1007/s10840-012-9669-2. PMC 3627722. PMID 22406930.
  4. Nadkarni VM, Larkin GL, Peberdy MA, Carey SM, Kaye W, Mancini ME; et al. (2006). "First documented rhythm and clinical outcome from in-hospital cardiac arrest among children and adults". JAMA. 295 (1): 50–7. doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.50. PMID 16391216.

Template:WH Template:WS