TAVR imaging
Aortic Stenosis Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Percutaneous Aortic Balloon Valvotomy (PABV) or Aortic Valvuloplasty |
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) |
Case Studies |
TAVR imaging On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of TAVR imaging |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1],Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Seyedmahdi Pahlavani, M.D. [2]
Overview
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE) is the best initial imaging modality for evaluating AS severity.[1] Although, multimodality imaging is needed for preprocedural planning and intraoperative decision making given the complex 3D anatomy of the aortic valve, sinuses, and annulus.[2] Multi-Detector CT (MDCT) is a core element of the standard imaging pathway for the preprocedural planning of TAVR.[3] In patients being evaluated for TAVR, MDCT systems with at least 64 detectors and a spatial resolution of 0.5 to 0.6 mm are recommended. Evaluation of kidney function to avoid contrast induced nephropathy must be taken in to consideration.
Definition
AS severity is defined based on imaging findings. Severe symptomatic (Stage D) AS is considered as TAVR candidate.
Abbreviations: ΔP: mean gradient, Vmax: maximum aortic velocity, AVA: aortic valve area. AS: aortic stenosis, AR: aortic regurgitation.
Severe symptomatic AS (stage D) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
STAGE | DEFINITION | SYMPTOMS | VALVE ANATOMY | VALVE HEMODYNAMICS | HEMODYNAMIC CONSEQUENCES |
D1 | Symptomatic severe high-gradient AS | Severe calcification or congenital stenosis with severely reduced opening |
| ||
D2 | Symptomatic severe low-flow/low gradient AS with reduced LVEF |
|
Severe calcification or congenital stenosis with severely reduced leaflet motion |
|
|
D3 | Symptomatic severe low gradient with normal LVEF |
|
Severe calcification with severely reduced leaflet motion |
|
|
TAVR imaging checklist
Abbreviations:
CV: Cardiovascular, AVR: Aortic valve replacement, AS: Aortic Stenosis, MR: Mitral Regurgitation, AR: Aortic Regurgitation, PAP: Pulmonary Artery Pressure, RV: Right Ventricle, CTA: CT angiography, PA: Pulmonary Artery, TEE: Trans Esophageal Echocardiography, TTE: Trans Thoracic Echocardiography
AVA: Aortic Valve Area; CMR: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging; CT: Computed Tomography; ECG: Electrocardiogram; EF: Ejection Fraction; DSE: Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography; ESRD: End-Stage Renal Disease; GFR: Glomerular Filtration Rate; LFLG: Low-Flow Low-Gradient; LV: Left Ventricular; LVEF: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction; MAC: Mitral Annular Calcification; MDCT: Multi Detector Computed Tomography; MRA: Magnetic Resonance Angiogram;
MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; MS: Mitral Stenosis; PET: Positron Emission Tomography; TAVR: Trans-catheter Aortic Valve Replacement
TAVR Imaging Checklist | ||
---|---|---|
Region of Interest | Recommended Approach and Key
Measures |
Additional Comments |
Preprocedure | ||
Aortic valve morphology | TTE:
|
|
Aortic valve function | TTE:
|
Additional parameters
|
LV Geometry and other
cardiac findings |
TTE:
|
|
Annular sizing |
|
|
Aortic root measurements |
|
|
Coronary disease and
thoracic anatomy |
|
|
Noncardiac imaging |
|
May be considered depending on clinical
history |
Vascular Access | ||
---|---|---|
Kidney Function Status | Recommended Approach | Key Parameters |
Normal renal function (GFR >60) or
ESRD not expected to recover |
|
Aorta, great vessel, and abdominal aorta
Dissection; atheroma; stenosis; calcification Iliac/subclavian/femoral luminal dimensions, calcification, and tortuosity |
Borderline renal
function |
|
Institutional dependent protocols
Luminal dimensions and tortuosity of peripheral vasculature |
Acute kidney injury or
ESRD with expected recovery |
|
Degree of calcification and tortuosity of peripheral vasculature |
TAVR Imaging Checklist | ||
---|---|---|
Imaging goals | Recommended Approach | Additional Details |
Periprocedure | ||
Interventional planning | TAVR CTA | Predict optimal fluoroscopy angles for valve
deployment |
Confirmation of annular
sizing |
Preprocedure MDCT | Consider contrast aortic root injection if
needed 3C TEE to confirm annular size |
Valve placement | Fluoroscopy under general anesthesia | TEE (if using general anesthesia) |
Paravalvular leak | Direct aortic root angiography | TEE (if using general anesthesia) |
Procedural complications |
Intracardiac echocardiography (alternative) |
|
Long-term Postprocedure | ||
Evaluate valve function | TTE | Key elements of echocardiography:
|
LV geometry and other
cardiac findings |
TTE:
|
Specific CT measurements for TAVR
TAVR CT Measurement Summary | |||
---|---|---|---|
Valve Size and Type | |||
Region of Interest | Specific
Measurements |
Measurement Technique | Additional
Comments |
Aortic valve morphology
and function |
Aortic valve |
|
Most useful in cases of LFLG AS where diagnosis is otherwise
unclear. May be helpful in defining number of valve cusps. |
LV geometry and other
cardiac findings |
LV outflow tract |
|
Quantification of calcification not standardized.
Large eccentric calcium may predispose for paravalvular regurgitation and annular rupture during valve deployment. |
Annular sizing | Aortic annulus |
|
Periprocedural TEE and/or balloon sizing can confirm
dimensions during case. |
Aortic root measurements | Sinus of Valsalva |
|
|
Coronary and thoracic
anatomy |
Coronary arteries |
|
Short coronary artery height increases risk of procedure. Evaluation of coronary artery and bypass graft stenosis on select studies. Estimate risk of coronary occlusion during valve deployment. |
Aortic root
angulation |
|
Reduce procedure time and contrast load by reducing number of periprocedural root
injections | |
Vascular Access Planning | |||
Vascular access | Aorta | Major/minor diameters of the following:
|
|
Primary peripheral vasculature | Major/minor dimensions, tortuosity, calcification of the following:
|
| |
Ancillary
vasculature |
Stenosis of the following: | ||
Relationship of
femoral bifurcation and femoral head |
Distance from inferior margin of femoral
head to femoral biforcation |
TAVR Imaging Evaluation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TAVR CT | ECHO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-gated Angiogram of Chest, Abdomen and Pelvic arteries for vascular access selection | ECG gated CT of annulus and Aortic root for valve sizing selection | Left ventricles and other findings | Confirm severe Aortic Stenosis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfemoral Approach | Annular sizing | Aortic Root sizing | Additional Procedural Planning | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subclavian Approach | Major/Minor Dimension | Coronary Ostia height | Fluoroscopy Angulation | LVEF and LV dimension | High gradient AS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Apical Approach | Area | Aortic Sinus to Commissure dimension | Bypass Grafts | Estimated Pulmonary pressure | Low gradient AS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Approaches | Circumferences | Sinotubular Junction | RV to Chest wall position | Other valvular abnormalities | Reduced EF | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carotid | Ascending Aorta dimension | Preserved EF | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct Aortic | Aortic Calcification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transvenous | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References
- ↑ Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Evangelista A, Griffin BP, Iung B, Otto CM, Pellikka PA, Quiñones M (2009). "Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice". J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 22 (1): 1–23, quiz 101–2. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.029. PMID 19130998.
- ↑ Hahn RT (2016). "Transcathether Valve Replacement and Valve Repair: Review of Procedures and Intraprocedural Echocardiographic Imaging". Circ. Res. 119 (2): 341–56. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.307972. PMID 27390336.
- ↑ Binder RK, Webb JG, Willson AB, Urena M, Hansson NC, Norgaard BL, Pibarot P, Barbanti M, Larose E, Freeman M, Dumont E, Thompson C, Wheeler M, Moss RR, Yang TH, Pasian S, Hague CJ, Nguyen G, Raju R, Toggweiler S, Min JK, Wood DA, Rodés-Cabau J, Leipsic J (2013). "The impact of integration of a multidetector computed tomography annulus area sizing algorithm on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective, multicenter, controlled trial". J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 62 (5): 431–8. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.036. PMID 23684679.