Thromboembolism diagnostic criteria
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
Thromboembolism Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Thromboembolism On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Thromboembolism |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Diagnostic Criteria
Diagnostic modalities may differ for deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Some patients may have the both clinical situations.
Probability Scoring
In 2006, Scarvelis and Wells overviewed a set of clinical prediction rules for DVT,[1] on the heels of a widely adopted set of clinical criteria for pulmonary embolism.[2] [3]
Wells Score or Criteria
(Possible score -2 to 9)
- 1) Active cancer (treatment within last 6 months or palliative) -- 1 point
- 2) Calf swelling >3 cm compared to other calf (measured 10 cm below tibial tuberosity) -- 1 point
- 3) Collateral superficial veins (non-varicose) -- 1 point
- 4) Pitting edema (confined to symptomatic leg) -- 1 point
- 5) Swelling of entire leg - 1 point
- 6) Localized pain along distribution of deep venous system -- 1 point
- 7) Paralysis, paresis, or recent cast immobilization of lower extremities -- 1 point
- 8) Recently bedridden > 3 days, or major surgery requiring regional or general anesthetic in past 12 weeks -- 1 point
- 9) Previously documented DVT -- 1 point
- 10) Alternative diagnosis at least as likely -- Subtract 2 points
Interpretation
Traditional interpretation [3] [4]
- Score >6.0 - High (probability 59% based on pooled data [5])
- Score 2.0 to 6.0 - Moderate (probability 29% based on pooled data[5])
- Score <2.0 - Low (probability 15% based on pooled data[5])
Alternate Interpretation
- Score > 4 - PE likely. Consider diagnostic imaging.[3] [6]
- Score 4 or less - PE unlikely. Consider D-dimer to rule out PE.
References
- ↑ Scarvelis D, Wells P (2006). "Diagnosis and treatment of deep-vein thrombosis". CMAJ. 175 (9): 1087–92. PMID 17060659. Free Full Text.
- ↑ Neff MJ. ACEP releases clinical policy on evaluation and management of pulmonary embolism. American Family Physician. 2003; 68(4):759-?. Available at: http://www.aafp.org/afp/20030815/practice.html. Accessed on: December 8, 2006.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, Bormanis J, Weitz J, Chamberlain M, Bowie D, Barnes D, Hirsh J. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost. 2000 Mar;83(3):416-20. PMID 10744147
- ↑ Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Stiell I, Dreyer JF, Barnes D, Forgie M, Kovacs G, Ward J, Kovacs MJ. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med. 2001 Jul 17;135(2):98-107. PMID 11453709
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Stein PD, Woodard PK, Weg JG, Wakefield TW, Tapson VF, Sostman HD, Sos TA, Quinn DA, Leeper KV, Hull RD, Hales CA, Gottschalk A, Goodman LR, Fowler SE, Buckley JD (2007). "Diagnostic pathways in acute pulmonary embolism: recommendations of the PIOPED II Investigators". Radiology. 242 (1): 15–21. doi:10.1148/radiol.2421060971. PMID 17185658.
- ↑ van Belle A, Büller HR, Huisman MV, Huisman PM, Kaasjager K, Kamphuisen PW, Kramer MH, Kruip MJ, Kwakkel-van Erp JM, Leebeek FW, Nijkeuter M, Prins MH, Sohne M, Tick LW; Christopher Study Investigators. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA. 2006 Jan 11;295(2):172-9. PMID 16403929