Eosinophilia medical therapy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
George Leef (talk | contribs) |
George Leef (talk | contribs) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
*Medical treatment for eosinophilia should be directed at the underlying cause (for example treating parasitic infection or malignancy). | |||
*Eosinophilia without evidence of organ dysfunction may be observed with monitoring for evidence of organ involvement. | |||
*Treatment of hypereosinophilic syndrome has a number of options including [[corticosteroids]], [[hydroxyurea]], [[interferon-alpha]], [[imatinib]] and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors, IL-5 antibodies, and other cytotoxic and immunomodulatory agents. | |||
=== Medical Therapy === | === Medical Therapy for Hypereosinophilia Syndromes=== | ||
*Corticosteroids are commonly used as first line therapy. They are able to produce a rapid decrease in eosinophil counts, which is valuable if there is already evidence of organ dysfunction related to high eosinophil levels. <ref | *Corticosteroids are most commonly used as first line therapy. They are able to produce a rapid decrease in eosinophil counts, which is valuable if there is already evidence of organ dysfunction related to high eosinophil levels. <ref>Ogbogu et al. Hypereosinophilic syndrome: A multicenter, retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and response to therapy. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (2009) 124(6):1319–1325</ref> | ||
**0.5-1mg/kg/day of prednisone (or the equivalent dose of another steroids) is the recommended starting dose. Patients with non-severe disease manifestations can start with lower doses | **0.5-1mg/kg/day of prednisone (or the equivalent dose of another steroids) is the recommended starting dose. Patients with non-severe disease manifestations can start with lower doses | ||
**Steroids are tapered over time, with second line agents added if needed to maintain control. | **Steroids are tapered over time, with second line agents added if needed to maintain control. | ||
**In one study, corticosteroids were able to induce remission in 85% of patients at 1 month | **In one study, corticosteroids were able to induce remission in 85% of patients at 1 month | ||
*Hydroxyurea is the most commonly used second-line agent for hypereosinophilic syndrome. Typical dose range is 500mg-2g per day. Hydroxyurea acts at the level of the bone marrow to reduce production of new eosinophilis. | *Hydroxyurea is the most commonly used second-line agent for hypereosinophilic syndrome. Typical dose range is 500mg-2g per day. Hydroxyurea acts at the level of the bone marrow to reduce production of new eosinophilis. As such it is not suitable if a rapid lowering in eosinophil levels is needed. Hydroxyurea is not usually used alone, it is most often used as an additional steroid-sparing agents. | ||
*[[Interferon-alpha]] is also a second-line, steroid sparing agent. Use of this agent is limited by its toxicities. Interferon-alpha also has activity on lymphocytes, so it may be particularly effective in eosinophilia secondary to lymphocytic malignancies. | *[[Interferon-alpha]] is also a second-line, steroid sparing agent. Use of this agent is limited by its toxicities. Interferon-alpha also has activity on lymphocytes, so it may be particularly effective in eosinophilia secondary to lymphocytic malignancies. | ||
*[[Imatinib]] and related TKIs have shown promise in treating [[chronic eosinophilic leukemia]] due to similar molecular re-arrangements as CML. | *[[Imatinib]] and related TKIs have shown promise in treating [[chronic eosinophilic leukemia]] due to similar molecular re-arrangements as CML. <ref>Pardanani et al. Imatinib therapy for hypereosinophilic syndrome and other eosinophilic disorders. Blood 2003 101:3391-3397.</ref> This family of TKIs is very well tolerated. These drugs are most effective in patients who have the FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement driving a clonal expansion in the bone marrow. | ||
*Other cytotoxic agents have been used in isolated cases, but lack strong evidence | *Other cytotoxic agents have been used in isolated cases, but lack strong evidence | ||
*In severe cases refractory to other therapy, stem cell transplant may be considered if the cause of the eosinophilia is a primary bone marrow process. | *In severe cases refractory to other therapy, stem cell transplant may be considered if the cause of the eosinophilia is a primary bone marrow process. |
Latest revision as of 22:31, 29 August 2016
Eosinophilia Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Eosinophilia medical therapy On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Eosinophilia medical therapy |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Eosinophilia medical therapy |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:
Overview
- Medical treatment for eosinophilia should be directed at the underlying cause (for example treating parasitic infection or malignancy).
- Eosinophilia without evidence of organ dysfunction may be observed with monitoring for evidence of organ involvement.
- Treatment of hypereosinophilic syndrome has a number of options including corticosteroids, hydroxyurea, interferon-alpha, imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors, IL-5 antibodies, and other cytotoxic and immunomodulatory agents.
Medical Therapy for Hypereosinophilia Syndromes
- Corticosteroids are most commonly used as first line therapy. They are able to produce a rapid decrease in eosinophil counts, which is valuable if there is already evidence of organ dysfunction related to high eosinophil levels. [1]
- 0.5-1mg/kg/day of prednisone (or the equivalent dose of another steroids) is the recommended starting dose. Patients with non-severe disease manifestations can start with lower doses
- Steroids are tapered over time, with second line agents added if needed to maintain control.
- In one study, corticosteroids were able to induce remission in 85% of patients at 1 month
- Hydroxyurea is the most commonly used second-line agent for hypereosinophilic syndrome. Typical dose range is 500mg-2g per day. Hydroxyurea acts at the level of the bone marrow to reduce production of new eosinophilis. As such it is not suitable if a rapid lowering in eosinophil levels is needed. Hydroxyurea is not usually used alone, it is most often used as an additional steroid-sparing agents.
- Interferon-alpha is also a second-line, steroid sparing agent. Use of this agent is limited by its toxicities. Interferon-alpha also has activity on lymphocytes, so it may be particularly effective in eosinophilia secondary to lymphocytic malignancies.
- Imatinib and related TKIs have shown promise in treating chronic eosinophilic leukemia due to similar molecular re-arrangements as CML. [2] This family of TKIs is very well tolerated. These drugs are most effective in patients who have the FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement driving a clonal expansion in the bone marrow.
- Other cytotoxic agents have been used in isolated cases, but lack strong evidence
- In severe cases refractory to other therapy, stem cell transplant may be considered if the cause of the eosinophilia is a primary bone marrow process.
References
- ↑ Ogbogu et al. Hypereosinophilic syndrome: A multicenter, retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and response to therapy. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (2009) 124(6):1319–1325
- ↑ Pardanani et al. Imatinib therapy for hypereosinophilic syndrome and other eosinophilic disorders. Blood 2003 101:3391-3397.