Reperfusion injury future or investigational therapies: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Reperfusion therapy}} '''Editors-In-Chief:''' {{AC}}; C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [mailto:Mgibson@perfuse.org] ==Overview== ==Future Directions== While there has be...")
 
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Reperfusion therapy}}
{{Reperfusion injury}}


'''Editors-In-Chief:''' {{AC}}; [[C. Michael Gibson]], M.S., M.D. [mailto:Mgibson@perfuse.org]
{{CMG}} {{AE}} {{AC}}{{Shivam Singla}}


==Overview==
==Overview==
A lot of studies done in the past three decades helped a lot in understanding the [[molecular]] mechanisms associated with [[Ischemia-reperfusion injury]]. Also, these studies helped in evaluating various strategies to decrease the [[incidence]] and severity associated with [[Ischemia-reperfusion injury]].
Existing therapies for [[Ischemia-reperfusion injury]] can be divided into [[Pharmacological]] and [[non-pharmacological]] interventions. A lot of promising studies and [[clinical trials]] are still under the pipeline. Till the date, the most encouraging results are associated with [[ischemic]] preconditioning and postconditioning, [[adenosine]], and [[exenatide]]. A lot of studies have demonstrated the combined effect of [[pharmacological]] and [[nonpharmacological]] approach as together to be used as a multifactorial approach to improve the [[clinical]] outcomes.


==Future Directions==
==Future or Investigational Therapies==
While there has been significant progress made in understanding repercussion injury, from molecular mechanisms to bedside clinical interventional, there are several areas that warrant further study.  Some of these topics were outlined by the 2010 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop on Cardioprotection<ref name="pmid21900096">{{cite journal| author=Schwartz Longacre L, Kloner RA, Arai AE, Baines CP, Bolli R, Braunwald E et al.| title=New horizons in cardioprotection: recommendations from the 2010 national heart, lung, and blood institute workshop. | journal=Circulation | year= 2011 | volume= 124 | issue= 10 | pages= 1172-9 | pmid=21900096 | doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.032698 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=21900096  }} </ref>, and include:
 
#Identifying the molecular and subcellular mechanisms responsible for postconditioning, remote conditioning, and preconditioning.
While there has been significant [[progress]] made in understanding [[repercussion injury]], from molecular mechanisms to bedside [[clinical]] interventional, there are several areas that warrant further study.  Some of these topics were outlined by the 2010 National [[Heart]], [[Lung]], and [[Blood]] Institute Workshop on [[Cardioprotection]]<ref name="pmid21900096">{{cite journal| author=Schwartz Longacre L, Kloner RA, Arai AE, Baines CP, Bolli R, Braunwald E et al.| title=New horizons in cardioprotection: recommendations from the 2010 national heart, lung, and blood institute workshop. | journal=Circulation | year= 2011 | volume= 124 | issue= 10 | pages= 1172-9 | pmid=21900096 | doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.032698 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=21900096  }} </ref>, and include:
#Determining whether the protective mechanism triggered by remote conditioning is humoral, neural, or both.
#Identifying the [[molecular]] and [[subcellular mechanisms]] responsible for [[postconditioning]], remote conditioning, and preconditioning.
#Investigating whether age, obesity, and diabetes mellitus may attenuate the beneficial effects of cardioprotective strategies.
#Determining whether the protective mechanism triggered by remote conditioning is [[humoral]], [[neural]], or both.
#Developing additional pharmacological strategies that mimic, synergize, or augment the protection exerted by conditioning protocols in conjunction with repercussion.
#Investigating whether [[age]], [[obesity]], and [[diabetes mellitus]] may attenuate the beneficial effects of [[cardioprotective strategies]].
#Establishing a cardioprotective clinical trial network concurrent with the existing and complementary preclinical network (CAESAR) to test promising cardioprotective agents and strategies in patients in the setting of both acute myocardial infarction and cardiac surgery.
#Developing additional [[pharmacological strategies]] that mimic, synergize, or augment the protection exerted by conditioning protocols in conjunction with repercussion<ref name="pmid27033199">{{cite journal |vauthors=Chi HJ, Chen ML, Yang XC, Lin XM, Sun H, Zhao WS, Qi D, Dong JL, Cai J |title=Progress in Therapies for Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion Injury |journal=Curr Drug Targets |volume=18 |issue=15 |pages=1712–1721 |date=2017 |pmid=27033199 |doi=10.2174/1389450117666160401120308 |url=}}</ref>.
#Establishing a [[cardioprotective]] [[clinical trial]] network concurrent with the existing and complementary preclinical network (CAESAR) to test promising [[cardioprotective agents]] and strategies in [[patients]] in the setting of both [[acute myocardial infarction]] and [[cardiac]] [[surgery]].


==References==
==References==
Line 20: Line 23:
[[Category:Cardiology]]
[[Category:Cardiology]]
[[Category:Up-To-Date]]
[[Category:Up-To-Date]]
[[Category:Up-To-Date cardiology]]
[[Category: Up-To-Date cardiology]]

Latest revision as of 00:57, 23 August 2020

Reperfusion injury Microchapters

Home

Overview

Pathophysiology

Risk Factors

Natural History, Complications & Prognosis

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Reperfusion injury future or investigational therapies On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Reperfusion injury future or investigational therapies

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Reperfusion injury future or investigational therapies

CDC on Reperfusion injury future or investigational therapies

Reperfusion injury future or investigational therapies in the news

Blogs on Reperfusion injury future or investigational therapies

Directions to Hospitals Treating Reperfusion injury

Risk calculators and risk factors for Reperfusion injury future or investigational therapies

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Anjan K. Chakrabarti, M.D. [2]Shivam Singla, M.D.[3]

Overview

A lot of studies done in the past three decades helped a lot in understanding the molecular mechanisms associated with Ischemia-reperfusion injury. Also, these studies helped in evaluating various strategies to decrease the incidence and severity associated with Ischemia-reperfusion injury. Existing therapies for Ischemia-reperfusion injury can be divided into Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. A lot of promising studies and clinical trials are still under the pipeline. Till the date, the most encouraging results are associated with ischemic preconditioning and postconditioning, adenosine, and exenatide. A lot of studies have demonstrated the combined effect of pharmacological and nonpharmacological approach as together to be used as a multifactorial approach to improve the clinical outcomes.

Future or Investigational Therapies

While there has been significant progress made in understanding repercussion injury, from molecular mechanisms to bedside clinical interventional, there are several areas that warrant further study. Some of these topics were outlined by the 2010 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop on Cardioprotection[1], and include:

  1. Identifying the molecular and subcellular mechanisms responsible for postconditioning, remote conditioning, and preconditioning.
  2. Determining whether the protective mechanism triggered by remote conditioning is humoral, neural, or both.
  3. Investigating whether age, obesity, and diabetes mellitus may attenuate the beneficial effects of cardioprotective strategies.
  4. Developing additional pharmacological strategies that mimic, synergize, or augment the protection exerted by conditioning protocols in conjunction with repercussion[2].
  5. Establishing a cardioprotective clinical trial network concurrent with the existing and complementary preclinical network (CAESAR) to test promising cardioprotective agents and strategies in patients in the setting of both acute myocardial infarction and cardiac surgery.

References

  1. Schwartz Longacre L, Kloner RA, Arai AE, Baines CP, Bolli R, Braunwald E; et al. (2011). "New horizons in cardioprotection: recommendations from the 2010 national heart, lung, and blood institute workshop". Circulation. 124 (10): 1172–9. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.032698. PMID 21900096.
  2. Chi HJ, Chen ML, Yang XC, Lin XM, Sun H, Zhao WS, Qi D, Dong JL, Cai J (2017). "Progress in Therapies for Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion Injury". Curr Drug Targets. 18 (15): 1712–1721. doi:10.2174/1389450117666160401120308. PMID 27033199.