Burn cost-effectiveness of therapy: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ {{Burn}} Please help WikiDoc by adding content here. It's easy! Click here to learn about editing. ==References== {{Reflist|2}} [[...") |
Hudakarman (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{Burn}} | {{Burn}} | ||
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{EAM}} | |||
==Overview== | |||
==Burn cost-effectiveness of therapy== | |||
In patients treated with Aloe Vera gel, healing of burn wounds were remarkably early than those patients treated with 1% silver sulfadiazine. All the patients of Aloe Vera group were relieved of pain earlier than those patients who were treated with SSD<ref name="pmid23894900">{{cite journal| author=Shahzad MN, Ahmed N| title=Effectiveness of Aloe Vera gel compared with 1% silver sulphadiazine cream as burn wound dressing in second degree burns. | journal=J Pak Med Assoc | year= 2013 | volume= 63 | issue= 2 | pages= 225-30 | pmid=23894900 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=23894900 }}</ref>. | |||
Laser Doppler imaging improved therapeutic decisions. It resulted in a shorter wound healing time in the subgroup of admitted patients requiring surgery and has the potential for cost savings of €875 per scanned patient<ref name="pmid26710049">{{cite journal| author=Hop MJ, Stekelenburg CM, Hiddingh J, Kuipers HC, Middelkoop E, Nieuwenhuis MK | display-authors=etal| title=Cost-Effectiveness of Laser Doppler Imaging in Burn Care in The Netherlands: A Randomized Controlled Trial. | journal=Plast Reconstr Surg | year= 2016 | volume= 137 | issue= 1 | pages= 166e-176e | pmid=26710049 | doi=10.1097/PRS.0000000000001900 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=26710049 }}</ref>. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | {{Reflist|2}} | ||
{{WikiDoc Help Menu}} | |||
{{WikiDoc Sources}} | |||
[[Category:Needs content]] | [[Category:Needs content]] | ||
| Line 11: | Line 19: | ||
[[Category:Emergency medicine]] | [[Category:Emergency medicine]] | ||
[[Category:Dermatology]] | [[Category:Dermatology]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:35, 15 January 2021
|
Burn Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Burn cost-effectiveness of therapy On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Burn cost-effectiveness of therapy |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Burn cost-effectiveness of therapy |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Eman Alademi, M.D.[2]
Overview
Burn cost-effectiveness of therapy
In patients treated with Aloe Vera gel, healing of burn wounds were remarkably early than those patients treated with 1% silver sulfadiazine. All the patients of Aloe Vera group were relieved of pain earlier than those patients who were treated with SSD[1].
Laser Doppler imaging improved therapeutic decisions. It resulted in a shorter wound healing time in the subgroup of admitted patients requiring surgery and has the potential for cost savings of €875 per scanned patient[2].
References
- ↑ Shahzad MN, Ahmed N (2013). "Effectiveness of Aloe Vera gel compared with 1% silver sulphadiazine cream as burn wound dressing in second degree burns". J Pak Med Assoc. 63 (2): 225–30. PMID 23894900.
- ↑ Hop MJ, Stekelenburg CM, Hiddingh J, Kuipers HC, Middelkoop E, Nieuwenhuis MK; et al. (2016). "Cost-Effectiveness of Laser Doppler Imaging in Burn Care in The Netherlands: A Randomized Controlled Trial". Plast Reconstr Surg. 137 (1): 166e–176e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000001900. PMID 26710049.