Hematuria other imaging findings: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Adnan Ezici (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{Hematuria}} | {{Hematuria}} | ||
{{CMG}}{{AE}}{{VSKP}} | |||
==Overview== | |||
Other imaging studies for hematuria include intravenous urography and endoscopy.<ref name="pmid230987842">Davis R, Jones JS, Barocas DA, Castle EP, Lang EK, Leveillee RJ et al. (2012) [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=23098784 Diagnosis, evaluation and follow-up of asymptomatic microhematuria (AMH) in adults: AUA guideline.] ''J Urol'' 188 (6 Suppl):2473-81. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.078 DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.078] PMID: [https://pubmed.gov/23098784 23098784]</ref> | |||
==Other Imaging Findings== | |||
=== '''Intravenous Urography (IVU)''' === | |||
'''Advantages''' | |||
* IVU is good at detecting abnormalities of the [[urothelium]] (UCC of the ureter and renal pelvis) and stones.<ref name="pmid24364522">Sharp VJ, Barnes KT, Erickson BA (2013) [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=24364522 Assessment of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults.] ''Am Fam Physician'' 88 (11):747-54. PMID: [https://pubmed.gov/24364522 24364522]</ref> | |||
'''Disadvantages''' | |||
* Poor at detecting small renal parenchymal lesions that do not distort the renal outline. | |||
* It cannot distinguish cystic from solid masses. | |||
== | === '''Endoscopy/ Fluoroscopy''' === | ||
'''Advantages''' | |||
* Used to investigate [[intravenous urography]] filling defects and to treat stones. | |||
* In patient with continued undiagnosed hematuria, this can be used to collect urine or brushings from each ureter, allowing cytology to determine the site of bleeding and the presence of very small tumors of carcinoma in-situ.<ref name="pmid27261791">Avellino GJ, Bose S, Wang DS (2016) [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=27261791 Diagnosis and Management of Hematuria.] ''Surg Clin North Am'' 96 (3):503-15. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2016.02.007 DOI:10.1016/j.suc.2016.02.007] PMID: [https://pubmed.gov/27261791 27261791]</ref> | |||
'''Disadvantages''' | |||
* Requires general anaesthesia for the procedure. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | {{Reflist|2}} | ||
{{WH}} | |||
{{WS}} | |||
[[Category:Nephrology]] | [[Category:Nephrology]] | ||
[[Category:Urology]] | [[Category:Urology]] | ||
[[Category:Urologic Disease]] | [[Category:Urologic Disease]] | ||
[[Category:Emergency medicine]] | [[Category:Emergency medicine]] | ||
[[Category:Needs content]] | [[Category:Needs content]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:40, 10 August 2021
|
Hematuria Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Hematuria other imaging findings On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Hematuria other imaging findings |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Hematuria other imaging findings |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Venkata Sivakrishna Kumar Pulivarthi M.B.B.S [2]
Overview
Other imaging studies for hematuria include intravenous urography and endoscopy.[1]
Other Imaging Findings
Intravenous Urography (IVU)
Advantages
- IVU is good at detecting abnormalities of the urothelium (UCC of the ureter and renal pelvis) and stones.[2]
Disadvantages
- Poor at detecting small renal parenchymal lesions that do not distort the renal outline.
- It cannot distinguish cystic from solid masses.
Endoscopy/ Fluoroscopy
Advantages
- Used to investigate intravenous urography filling defects and to treat stones.
- In patient with continued undiagnosed hematuria, this can be used to collect urine or brushings from each ureter, allowing cytology to determine the site of bleeding and the presence of very small tumors of carcinoma in-situ.[3]
Disadvantages
- Requires general anaesthesia for the procedure.
References
- ↑ Davis R, Jones JS, Barocas DA, Castle EP, Lang EK, Leveillee RJ et al. (2012) Diagnosis, evaluation and follow-up of asymptomatic microhematuria (AMH) in adults: AUA guideline. J Urol 188 (6 Suppl):2473-81. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.078 PMID: 23098784
- ↑ Sharp VJ, Barnes KT, Erickson BA (2013) Assessment of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults. Am Fam Physician 88 (11):747-54. PMID: 24364522
- ↑ Avellino GJ, Bose S, Wang DS (2016) Diagnosis and Management of Hematuria. Surg Clin North Am 96 (3):503-15. DOI:10.1016/j.suc.2016.02.007 PMID: 27261791