Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Bot: Removing from Primary care)
 
(146 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis}}
{{Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis}}
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{SCh}}
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{SCh}} {{AY}}


==Overview==
==Overview==
* '''Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis''' (SBP) is a form of [[peritonitis]] that occurs in patients with advanced [[cirrhosis]] as a manifestation of severe derangement of hepatic function.
'''Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis''' ([[SBP]]) is a form of [[peritonitis]] that occurs in most of the patients with advanced [[cirrhosis]], in 10-30% of hospitalized patients with [[ascites]] and in various other clinical settings, such as [[nephrotic syndrome]], [[heart failure]], [[tuberculous]] infection, [[continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis]] for [[chronic renal failure]].<ref name="pmid8142677">{{cite journal| author=Kato A, Ohtake T, Furuya R, Nakajima T, Ohura M, Kumagai H et al.| title=Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in an adult patient with nephrotic syndrome. | journal=Intern Med | year= 1993 | volume= 32 | issue= 9 | pages= 719-21 | pmid=8142677 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=8142677  }} </ref> <ref name="pmid6486115">{{cite journal| author=Runyon BA| title=Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis associated with cardiac ascites. | journal=Am J Gastroenterol | year= 1984 | volume= 79 | issue= 10 | pages= 796 | pmid=6486115 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=6486115  }} </ref> SBP is diagnosed with a positive [[Bacterial cultures|bacterial culture]] for a single organism and an [[Ascitic|AF]] ( [[Ascitic|ascitic fluid]]) : [[PMNs|polymorphonuclear (PMN)]] cell count of > 250/mm3, in the absence of a surgically treatable intra-abdominal source of infection. More than 60% of [[SBP]] episodes are caused by enteric [[gram-negative]] organisms such as [[Escherichia coli]] and [[Klebsiella|Kleibsella]]. Selective intestinal decontamination (SID) with [[Fluoroquinolones|fluorinated quinolones]] suppresses the [[gram-negative]] intestinal flora and is known to reduce the [[incidence]] of [[SBP]].<ref name="pmid1985045">{{cite journal| author=Soriano G, Guarner C, Teixidó M, Such J, Barrios J, Enríquez J et al.| title=Selective intestinal decontamination prevents spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. | journal=Gastroenterology | year= 1991 | volume= 100 | issue= 2 | pages= 477-81 | pmid=1985045 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=1985045  }} </ref><ref name="pmid9148028">{{cite journal| author=Llovet JM, Rodríguez-Iglesias P, Moitinho E, Planas R, Bataller R, Navasa M et al.| title=Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis undergoing selective intestinal decontamination. A retrospective study of 229 spontaneous bacterial peritonitis episodes. | journal=J Hepatol | year= 1997 | volume= 26 | issue= 1 | pages= 88-95 | pmid=9148028 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=9148028  }} </ref> [[SBP]] results due to the inability of the [[gut]] to contain [[bacteria]] and failure of the [[immune system]] to eradicate the [[organisms]] once they have escaped into the [[blood stream]]. Clinical signs and symptoms are non specific and indistinguishable from [[secondary peritonitis]]. [[Ascites|Ascitic fluid]] analysis is helpful in differentiating SBP from [[secondary peritonitis]]. Because of the lack of [[Specificity (tests)|specificity]] and [[Sensitivity (tests)|sensitivity]] of clinical signs and symptoms, [[Cirrhosis|cirrhotic patients]] with unexplained deterioration should undergo a diagnostic [[paracentesis]]. Once diagnosed, patients with [[SBP]] should receive prompt [[Antibiotic|empiric antibiotic treatment]] ( [[Cephalosporins]]) without waiting for the [[Culture medium|ascitic fluid culture]]. Failure of prompt initiation of [[antibiotics]] results in significant and potentially fatal deterioration in the clinical status of the patient. Patients who survive an episode of SBP are at high risk of recurrence. Patients with [[cirrhosis]] and [[ascites]] developing [[abdominal pain]] and/or [[temperature]] >100F are more prone to have [[SBP]] and should receive [[antibiotic|empiric antibiotic treatment]]. Early detection and treatment improve outcome and prevent complications such as [[shock]] and [[renal failure]].<ref name="pmid3884467">{{cite journal| author=Crossley IR, Williams R| title=Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. | journal=Gut | year= 1985 | volume= 26 | issue= 4 | pages= 325-31 | pmid=3884467 | doi= | pmc=1432517 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=3884467  }} </ref>
* And so, an episode of SBP has been proposed as an indication for liver transplantation in the absence of contraindications.
 
* It occurs in 10-30% of hospitalized patients with [[ascites]].
To see a comprehensive video about [[SBP]], click [[Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview#Videos|here]].
* SBP has been studied extensively since its first description in 1964 which has lead to a greater understanding of the disease and reduction in the mortality from 80-90% to 30% or less in the past 10 years likely due to earlier detection and effective, nontoxic therapy.
* SBP has also been described to occur in various clinical settings, as in nephrotic syndrome or heart failure.
* SBP has been diagnosed with a positive bacterial culture for a single organism and an AF ( ascitic fluid) polymorphonuclear (PMN) cell count of >250mm3, in the absence of a surgically treatable intra-abdominal source of infection.
* More than 60% of SBP episodes are caused by enteric gram-negative organisms like Escherichia coli.
* Selective Intestinal Decontamination ( SID ) with fluorinated quinolones, to suppress the gram-negative intestinal flora has been known to reduce the incidence of SBP.
* SBP is a result of culmination of the inability of the gut to contain bacteria and failure of the immune system to eradicate the organisms once they have escaped.
* Predisposing factors for the AF infection in patients with Cirrhosis and ascites include:
** Severity of the liver disease.
** Serum total bilirubin level of >2.5 mg/dl.
** Total protein level <1 g/dl.
** Gasto-intestinal bleeding.
* Clinical signs and symptoms do not distinguish secondary from spontaneous peritonitis.
* AF analysis is helpful in differentiating SBP from secondary peritonitis which is a surgically treatable source of infection.
* The symptoms observed most frequently are Fever and abdominal pain.
* Because of this lack of specificity and sensitivity of clinical signs and symptoms, instances of unexplained deteri- oration in patients with cirrhosis should lead to a diagnostic paracentesis.
* Once diagnosed, patients with SBP should receive prompt empiric antibiotic treatment ( Cephalosporins) without waiting for the AF culture results because a delay in antibiotic treatment may result in a significant and potentially fatal deterioration in the clinical status of the patient.
* Prompt diagnosis and treatment maximize survival among patients with AF infections.
* Repeat paracenteses for follow-up of patients with SBP are considered to rule out secondary peritonitis if there is no clinical response to the treatment and the infection is polymicrobial.
* Those patients who survive an episode of SBP are at high risk of recurrence.
* Bacterascites represents the colonization of AF with bacteria without a neutrocytic response.
** Outcome depends on the clinical status of the patient:
*** Patients with newly developed abdominal pain and/or temperature >100F are more prone to progress to SBP and therefore should receive empiric antibiotic treatment as stated for SBP
* Currently, there are essentially no deaths as a result of SBP, provided it is detected and treated before the development of shock or renal failure, which are the most frequent complications of this disease.


==Historical Perspective==
==Historical Perspective==
* Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis was known to emerge from different stages as follows:
Kerr and colleagues (1963) described 11 episodes of [[Infection|ascitic fluid infection]] in 9 cirrhotic patients while Harold O.Conn , M.D, a world-renowned hepatologist (1964) introduced the term “[[spontaneous bacterial peritonitis]]” for the first time in English literature. Later in the history, [[SBP]] was studied extensively by many renowned researchers and health care professionals as this condition was seen among many patients with [[cirrhosis]], which has lead to the thorough understanding and recognition of [[SBP]].
* Bacteria migrating from the infected bowel (due to the altered bowel flora ) seen in hepatic cirrhosis enter the portal blood and escape the "bacterial filter" in the liver since a high proportion of the portal flow in cirrhotics may bypass the liver sinusoids.
* Having entered into the systemic circulation the bacteria are more likely to survive since cirrhotics have a reduced resistance to infection.
* In such conditions, they are more prone to cause bacteremia and life-threatening sepsis.
* A few case reports have appeared in the French and American literature but the condition attracted little attention until 1958.
* In 1958, Caroli and Platteborse described 20 patients with cirrhosis developing coliform septicemia and peritonitis, in whom Gram-negative organisms were cultured from blood, ascitic fluid, or both.
* Kerr and colleagues in 1963 published two papers on the ascitic fluid infection as a complication of cirrhosis.<ref name="pmid14084751">{{cite journal| author=KERR DN, PEARSON DT, READ AE| title=INFECTION OF ASCITIC FLUID IN PATIENTS WITH HEPATIC CIRRHOSIS. | journal=Gut | year= 1963 | volume= 4 | issue=  | pages= 394-8 | pmid=14084751 | doi= | pmc=1413490 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=14084751  }} </ref>
* Prof Harold O. Conn was the first to use term "spontaneous bacterial peritonitis" in English literature in 1964.
* Krencker 1907; Brule et al 1939; Cachin 1955; Navasa et al 1999 described that ascitic fluid infections were most common in patients with cirrhosis.
* Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), reported by Caroli and Platteborse (1958) has had its importance increased since Kerr and colleagues[1](1963) and Conn (1964) published two papers about this cirrhosis complication almost simultaneously.<ref name="pmid14138877">{{cite journal| author=CONN HO| title=SPONTANEOUS PERITONITIS AND BACTEREMIA IN LAENNEC'S CIRRHOSIS CAUSED BY ENTERIC ORGANISMS. A RELATIVELY COMMON BUT RARELY RECOGNIZED SYNDROME. | journal=Ann Intern Med | year= 1964 | volume= 60 | issue=  | pages= 568-80 | pmid=14138877 | doi= | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=14138877  }} </ref>
Kerr and colleagues (1963) described 11 episodes of ascitic fluid infection in 9 cirrhotic patients while Harold O.Conn , M.D, a world-renowned hepatologist (1964) introduced the term “spontaneous bacterial peritonitis” for the first time in English literature.
* Later in the history, SBP was studied extensively by many renowned researchers and health care professionals as this condition was seen among many patients with cirrhosis, which has lead to the thorough understanding and recognition of SBP.


==Classification==
==Classification==
* Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is one of the variants of ascitic fluid infections.<ref name="pmid15920324">{{cite journal| author=Sheer TA, Runyon BA| title=Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. | journal=Dig Dis | year= 2005 | volume= 23 | issue= 1 | pages= 39-46 | pmid=15920324 | doi=10.1159/000084724 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=15920324  }} </ref>
[[Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis]] is one of the variants of [[Ascites|ascitic fluid]] [[infections]].<ref name="pmid15920324">{{cite journal| author=Sheer TA, Runyon BA| title=Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. | journal=Dig Dis | year= 2005 | volume= 23 | issue= 1 | pages= 39-46 | pmid=15920324 | doi=10.1159/000084724 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=15920324  }} </ref>. Classification of [[Ascites|ascitic fluid]] [[Infection|infections]] is based on [[neutrophil]] count and [[Growth medium|culture]] report.<ref name="pmid25819304">Dever JB, Sheikh MY (2015) [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25819304 Review article: spontaneous bacterial peritonitis--bacteriology, diagnosis, treatment, risk factors and prevention.] ''Aliment Pharmacol Ther'' 41 (11):1116-31. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.13172 DOI:10.1111/apt.13172] PMID: [https://pubmed.gov/25819304 25819304]</ref><ref name="pmid19475696">{{cite journal| author=Runyon BA, AASLD Practice Guidelines Committee| title=Management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis: an update. | journal=Hepatology | year= 2009 | volume= 49 | issue= 6 | pages= 2087-107 | pmid=19475696 | doi=10.1002/hep.22853 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=19475696  }} </ref>. [[Asymptomatic]] [[Ascites|bacterascites]] is usually the transient residence of [[bacteria]] in [[Ascites|ascitic fluid]] without clinical features of [[peritonitis]] or increased [[Ascites|ascitic fluid]] [[polymorphonuclear cells]].<ref name="pmid2066060">{{cite journal| author=Pelletier G, Lesur G, Ink O, Hagege H, Attali P, Buffet C et al.| title=Asymptomatic bacterascites: is it spontaneous bacterial peritonitis? | journal=Hepatology | year= 1991 | volume= 14 | issue= 1 | pages= 112-5 | pmid=2066060 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=2066060  }} </ref>. SBP is also classified based on the routes of [[infection]] and the clinical setting as follows [[Health care]]-associated, [[Nosocomial]], [[Community-acquired pneumonia|Community acquired]], [[Multi-drug resistant]], Recurrent.
* Classification of ascitic fluid infections is based on neutrophil count and culture report as follows:<ref name="pmid25819304">Dever JB, Sheikh MY (2015) [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25819304 Review article: spontaneous bacterial peritonitis--bacteriology, diagnosis, treatment, risk factors and prevention.] ''Aliment Pharmacol Ther'' 41 (11):1116-31. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.13172 DOI:10.1111/apt.13172] PMID: [https://pubmed.gov/25819304 25819304]</ref><ref name="pmid19475696">{{cite journal| author=Runyon BA, AASLD Practice Guidelines Committee| title=Management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis: an update. | journal=Hepatology | year= 2009 | volume= 49 | issue= 6 | pages= 2087-107 | pmid=19475696 | doi=10.1002/hep.22853 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=19475696  }} </ref>
** Culture negative neutrocytic ascites (CNNA): As the name indicates, cultures of AF are negative, and a PMN cell count is ≥250cells/mm3.
** Monomicrobial bacterascites: Single bacteria isolated in cultures of AF and a PMN cell count of <250/mm3
** Polymicrobial bacterascites: Cultures of AF demonstrate multiple organisms and there is a PMN cell count of <250cells/mm3.
* Asymptomatic bacterascites is usually the transient residence of bacteria in ascitic fluid without clinical features of peritonitis or increased ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear cells.<ref name="pmid2066060">{{cite journal| author=Pelletier G, Lesur G, Ink O, Hagege H, Attali P, Buffet C et al.| title=Asymptomatic bacterascites: is it spontaneous bacterial peritonitis? | journal=Hepatology | year= 1991 | volume= 14 | issue= 1 | pages= 112-5 | pmid=2066060 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=2066060  }} </ref>
* Based on the routes of infection and the clinical setting SBP is classified as follows:
** Health care-associated, Nosocomial, Community acquired, Multi-drug resistant, Recurrent.


==Pathophysiology==
==Pathophysiology==
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is thought to result from a combination of factors related to cirrhosis and ascites such as:
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is thought to result from a combination of factors related to [[cirrhosis]] and [[ascites]] such as: altered [[Intestinal flora|microbial flora]], [[Hypomotility disorder|hypo-motility of the intestine]], intestinal [[bacterial overgrowth]], increased [[Intestinal mucosa|intestinal mucosal]] permeability, [[Translocation|bacterial translocation]] to [[lymph nodes]]. Presence of [[ascites]] is an important risk factor for the development of bacterial translocation. In healthy individuals, bacteria that colonize [[Lymph node|lymph nodes]] are killed by local [[Immune|immune defenses]]. However, in the setting of [[cirrhosis]], an acquired state of [[immunodeficiency]] there is: malfunctioning of the [[Reticulo-endothelial system|reticulo-endothelial]] and [[Neutrophil|neutrophilic system]], reduced [[Cellular immunity|cellular]] and [[Humoral immunity|humoral]] [[bactericidal]] function which favor the spread of bacteria to the [[blood stream]].<ref name="pmid26301048">{{cite journal| author=Tsiaoussis GI, Assimakopoulos SF, Tsamandas AC, Triantos CK, Thomopoulos KC| title=Intestinal barrier dysfunction in cirrhosis: Current concepts in pathophysiology and clinical implications. | journal=World J Hepatol | year= 2015 | volume= 7 | issue= 17 | pages= 2058-68 | pmid=26301048 | doi=10.4254/wjh.v7.i17.2058 | pmc=4539399 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=26301048  }} </ref><ref name="pmid7890896">{{cite journal| author=Runyon BA, Squier S, Borzio M| title=Translocation of gut bacteria in rats with cirrhosis to mesenteric lymph nodes partially explains the pathogenesis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. | journal=J Hepatol | year= 1994 | volume= 21 | issue= 5 | pages= 792-6 | pmid=7890896 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=7890896  }} </ref><ref name="pmid11693333">{{cite journal| author=Bauer TM, Steinbrückner B, Brinkmann FE, Ditzen AK, Schwacha H, Aponte JJ et al.| title=Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with cirrhosis: prevalence and relation with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. | journal=Am J Gastroenterol | year= 2001 | volume= 96 | issue= 10 | pages= 2962-7 | pmid=11693333 | doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04668.x | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=11693333  }} </ref>
* Intestinal bacterial overgrowth due to altered local IgA immune response and delayed intestinal transit.
* '''Alterations in the systemic [[immune response]]''': [[Bacteremia]] in a healthy host results in rapid coating of the [[bacteria]] by [[IgG]]/[[complement]] components which help in engulfing and killing of the [[bacteria]] by circulating [[neutrophils]]. But in [[cirrhosis]], several abnormalities have been described which lead to defective clearance of the [[bacteria]] include : decreased serum levels of [[Complement|complement components]] ([[Complement|C3]], [[Complement|C4]]), impaired [[chemotaxis]], poor function and [[phagocytic]] activity of [[neutrophils]], decreased function of Fc-gamma-receptors in [[macrophages]].  
* Increased Intestinal mucosal permeability and various bacterial virulence factors leads to bacterial translocation across the intestinal mucosa and can spread to other tissues including Lymph-nodes and the bloodstream.  
* [[Reticuloendothelial system|'''Reticuloendothelial system''']] '''[[Phagocytosis|phagocytic]] activity:''' The stationary [[macrophages]], such as the [[Kupffer cells]] of the liver, assist the circulating [[neutrophils]] in the extraction and killing of particulate matter (e.g., bacteria) from the systemic circulation. In Cirrhosis, there is hepatic [[Reticuloendothelial system|reticuloendothelial system (RES)]] dysfunction and  [[kupffer cells]] are decreased in number with impaired function along with the malfunctioning of the [[Neutrophil|neutrophilic system]]. Patients with the most severe dysfunction of [[Reticulo-endothelial system|RES]] are at highest risk of [[bacteremia]] and concomitant shortened survival, due to [[sepsis]]. The presence of intrahepatic and extra hepatic porto-systemic shunts as a consequence of [[portal hypertension]], prevent circulating [[bacteria]] from encountering [[kupffer cells]]. The final consequence of these abnormalities is the prolongation of [[bacteremia]] and eventual seeding of other sites, including [[Ascites|ascitic fluid]]. <ref name="pmid6693068">{{cite journal| author=Rimola A, Soto R, Bory F, Arroyo V, Piera C, Rodes J| title=Reticuloendothelial system phagocytic activity in cirrhosis and its relation to bacterial infections and prognosis. | journal=Hepatology | year= 1984 | volume= 4 | issue= 1 | pages= 53-8 | pmid=6693068 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=6693068  }} </ref>
* Presence of ascites appears to be an important risk factor for the development of bacterial translocation.
* '''[[Ascites|Ascitic fluid]] defense mechanisms, decreased local [[Ascitic|AF]] [[Opsonin|opsonic activity]]:''' The presence of bacteria in [[Ascites|ascitic fluid]] does not guarantee infection will develop, as [[Ascites|ascitic fluid]] is capable of [[Humoral immunity|humoral self-defense]] due to the effectiveness of the [[complement system]] and patients with adequate activity of this vital [[bactericidal]] system do not develop [[Ascitic|AF]] bacterial infections. In patients with [[Ascitic|ascitic fluid]] [[Complement|C3]] < 1g/dl and a [[Protein|protein level]] < 1g/dl are at an increased predisposition to [[SBP]]. The [[Complement|complement levels]] may be deficient because of increased consumption of these components or because of impaired synthesis, resulting in colonization of AF by [[bacteria]]. The decreased [[antimicrobial]] ability and can eventually lead to the development of infection [[bacteremia]]/ [[Endotoxin|endotoxemia]] leading to activation of [[Cytokine|cytokine cascade]]. [[Nitric oxide|NO]] and [[Tumor necrosis factors|TNF]] are important mediators of the further [[vasodilation]] and [[renal failure]] that often accompany SBP.
* In healthy individuals, bacteria that colonize lymph nodes are killed by local immune defenses
* However, in the setting of cirrhosis, an acquired state of Immunodeficiency there is:
**  Malfunctioning of the reticulo-endothelial and neutrophilic system
** Reduced Celular and Humoral bactericidal function  
which favor the spread of bacteria to the blood stream.
* Alterations in the systemic immune response:  
** Bacteremia in a healthy host results in rapid coating by IgG and/or Complement components and then engulfing and killing by circulating neutrophils.
** But in cirrhosis, as stated above several abnormalities have been described including :
*** Decreased serum levels of complement components (C3, C4).
*** Impaired chemotaxis.
*** Poor function and phagocytic activity of neutrophils.
*** Decreased function of Fc-gamma-receptors in macrophages.
* Reticuloendothelial system phagocytic activity:  
** The stationary macrophages, such as the Kupffer cells of the liver, assist the circulating neutrophils in the extraction and killing of particulate matter (e.g., bacteria) from the systemic circulation.
** In Cirrhosis, there is Hepatic Reticulo endothelial system (RES) dysfunction- Kupffer cells are decreased in number with impaired function along with the malfunctioning of the neutrophilic system  
* Patients with the most severe dysfunction of RES have the highest risk of bacteremia and concomitant shortened survival, due to sepsis.  
* The presence of intrahepatic and extrahepatic porto-systemic shunts as a consequence of portal hypertension, prevent circulating bacteria from encountering Kupffer cells.  
* The final consequence of these abnormalities is the prolongation of bacteremia and eventual seeding of other sites, including AF.
* AF defense mechanisms:
Decreased local AF opsonic activity
** The arrival of bacteria to the AF does not guarantee that infection will develop.
** Cirrhotic AF is capable of humoral self-defense, mainly on the basis of effectiveness of the complement system.
** Patients with adequate activity of this vital bactericidal system usually do not develop AF bacterial infections.
** Patients with AF C3 < 1g/dl and a protein level < 1g/dl have an increased predisposition to SBP.
** The complement levels may be deficient because of increased consumption of these components or because of impaired synthesis.
** If the complement levels are adequate to effectively kill the bacteria, infection will not develop.
** if complement levels are consumed and depleted, killing may be ineffective.
** Frequent colonization of AF by bacteria decreases its antimicrobial ability and can eventually lead to the development of infection.
 
* Bacteremia/ Endotoxemia leads to activation of cytokine cascade and some of these effector molecules and cytokines that help kill the bacteria have undesired side effects.
* NO and TNF are important mediators of the further vasodilation and renal failure that too often accompany SBP
* Iatrogenic and treatment related factors like PPI, and increased use of invasive procedures and catheters in patients with Cirrhosis and ascites.
* Other compelling factors like malnutrition and alcohol drinking have also been reported.


==Causes==
==Causes==
* Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is often a blood-borne infection caused by Enteric organisms-70% (Mono-microbial in 90%).
[[Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis]] is a [[Blood-borne infection|blood-borne]] infection caused by [[Enteric]] organisms in 70% of cases (Mono-microbial origin in 90% of cases). [[Aerobic bacteria|Aerobic]] [[gram-negative bacteria]] like ''[[Escherichia coli]]'' account for half of the cases. [[Gram-positive cocci]] ''[[Streptococcus]]'' species in 20% cases with [[enterococcus]] accounting for 5% of the cases. ''[[Staphylococcus aureus]]'' and ''[[Streptococcus salivarius]]'' are less frequent causes. Poly-microbial infection is [[Iatrogenic]] (more likely associated with abdominal [[paracentesis]]) or intra-abdominal source of [[infection]]. The cause of SBP has not been established definitively but is believed to involve hematogenous spread of organisms in a patient with a diseased [[liver]] and altered [[portal circulation]] resulting in defect in the usual [[filtration]] function. In adults, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis occurs most commonly in conjunction with [[cirrhosis]] of the liver and [[portal hypertension]] (frequently as a result of [[alcoholism]] and [[hepatitis]]).
* [[Aerobic bacteria|Aerobic]] [[gram-negative bacteria]] like ''[[Escherichia coli]]'' account for half of the cases.
* [[Gram-positive cocci]] ''[[Streptococcus]]''sp in 20% cases with enterococcus accounting for 5% of the cases
* ''[[Staphylococcus aureus]]'' and ''[[Streptococcus salivarius]]'' are less frequent causes.
* Poly-microbial infection is mostly because of Iatrogenic cause (more likely associated with abdominal paracentesis) or intra-abdominal source of infection.
* The cause of PBP has not been established definitively but is believed to involve hematogenous spread of organisms in a patient in whom a diseased liver and altered portal circulation result in a defect in the usual filtration function.
* In adults, primary bacterial peritonitis (PBP) occurs most commonly in conjunction with cirrhosis of the liver (frequently the result of alcoholism).
* However, the disease has been reported in adults with:
** Metastatic malignant disease
** Post-necrotic cirrhosis
** Chronic active hepatitis
** Acute viral hepatitis
** Congestive heart failure
** Systemic lupus erythematosus, and
** Lymphedema as well as in patients with no underlying disease.


==Differentiating {{PAGENAME}} from Other Diseases==
==Differentiating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis from Other Diseases==
[[SBP]] has to be differentiated from other abdominal conditions presenting with [[fever]] and [[abdominal pain]]. It also has to be differentiated from [[secondary peritonitis]], [[peritonitis|chemical peritonitis]], [[peritoneal dialysis]] [[peritonitis]], [[Tuberculous peritonitis|chronic tuberculous peritonitis]].


==Epidemiology and Demographics==
==Epidemiology and Demographics==
* The prevalence of SBP in cirrhotic patients with ascites admitted to the hospital ranges from 10%-30%.  
[[Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis]] ([[SBP]]) is a potentially life threatening complication in patients with [[cirrhosis]] and is seen in hospitalized patients. The prevalence of [[SBP]] in [[Cirrhosis|cirrhotic]] patients with [[ascites]] admitted to the hospital ranges from 10%-30%.<ref name="pmid24255734">{{cite journal| author=Oladimeji AA, Temi AP, Adekunle AE, Taiwo RH, Ayokunle DS| title=Prevalence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in liver cirrhosis with ascites. | journal=Pan Afr Med J | year= 2013 | volume= 15 | issue=  | pages= 128 | pmid=24255734 | doi=10.11604/pamj.2013.15.128.2702 | pmc=3830462 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=24255734  }} </ref>. Studies have demonstrated a 12% incidence of [[spontaneous bacterial peritonitis]] in patients admitted with [[Cirrhosis|decompensated cirrhosis]]. 2 studies examining asymptomatic patients presenting for a therapeutic [[paracentesis]] showed a combined 2.5% [[incidence]] of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Overall one-year [[mortality rate]] after a first episode of [[SBP]] is 30%-93% regardless of its recurrence. The mean age of presentation of [[SBP]] was 49 years. There is no gender difference in the incidence of SBP in patients with [[ascites]].
* Studies have demonstrated a 12% incidence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients admitted with decompensated cirrhosis.
* 2 studies examining asymptomatic patients presenting for a therapeutic paracentesis showed a combined 2.5% incidence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
* Overall one-year mortality rate after a first episode of SBP is 30%-93% regardless of its recurrence.
* The mean age of presentation of SBP was 49 years.
* In patients with ascites both sexes are affected equally.


==Risk Factors==
==Risk Factors==
Common risk factors in cirrhotic patients with ascites include:
Common risk factors in cirrhotic patients with [[ascites]] include: Low [[protein]] level in ascitic fluid (<1 g/dL), upper [[GI bleeding]], low [[complement]] concentration ([[C3 (complement)|complement 3]]) in ascitic fluid, [[renal failure]], Elevated serum [[bilirubin]] level (>4 mg/dL), use of [[Proton pump inhibitors]] ([[PPI]]) in cirrhotic patients, [[Child-Pugh score|Child-Pugh stage C]], [[MELD Score|Model For End-Stage Liver Disease MELD]] ≥ 22.<ref name="pmid25644943">{{cite journal| author=Schwabl P, Bucsics T, Soucek K, Mandorfer M, Bota S, Blacky A et al.| title=Risk factors for development of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and subsequent mortality in cirrhotic patients with ascites. | journal=Liver Int | year= 2015 | volume= 35 | issue= 9 | pages= 2121-8 | pmid=25644943 | doi=10.1111/liv.12795 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25644943  }} </ref>
* Low protein level in ascitic fluid (<1 g/dL)
* Upper GI bleeding
* Low complement concentration ([[C3 (complement)|complement 3]]) in ascitic fluid
* [[Renal failure]]
* Elevated serum bilirubin level (>4 mg/dL)
* Use of Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) in cirrhotic patients pose an increased risk
* Child-Pugh stage C
* MELD≥22


==Screening==
==Screening==
* According to European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hematology a positive Multistix8SG rapid urine screening test result in ascitic fluid in cirrhotic patients with ascites appears to be an indication for antibiotic treatment.
There is no definitive screening test for [[spontaneous bacterial peritonitis]]. According to Liver International journal, it has been demonstrated that fecal calprotectin concentrations (FCCs) are significantly elevated in [[Cirrhosis|cirrhotic patients]] and are dependent on the severity of liver disease. Assessing FCCs may help to identify [[Cirrhosis|cirrhotic patients]] with [[hepatic encephalopathy]] and [[SBP]] as a significant correlation emerged between elevated fecal calprotection and these complications.<ref name="GundlingSchmidtler2011">{{cite journal|last1=Gundling|first1=Felix|last2=Schmidtler|first2=Fabian|last3=Hapfelmeier|first3=Alexander|last4=Schulte|first4=Benjamin|last5=Schmidt|first5=Thomas|last6=Pehl|first6=Christian|last7=Schepp|first7=Wolfgang|last8=Seidl|first8=Holger|title=Fecal calprotectin is a useful screening parameter for hepatic encephalopathy and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis|journal=Liver International|volume=31|issue=9|year=2011|pages=1406–1415|issn=14783223|doi=10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02577.x}}</ref> However, there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for [[SBP]].
* According to Liver International journal, it has been demonstrated that fecal calprotectin concentrations (FCCs) are significantly elevated in cirrhotic patients and are dependent on the severity of liver disease.  
* Assessing FCCs may help to identify cirrhotic patients with HE and SBP as a significant correlation emerged between elevated fecal calprotection and these complications.<ref name="GundlingSchmidtler2011">{{cite journal|last1=Gundling|first1=Felix|last2=Schmidtler|first2=Fabian|last3=Hapfelmeier|first3=Alexander|last4=Schulte|first4=Benjamin|last5=Schmidt|first5=Thomas|last6=Pehl|first6=Christian|last7=Schepp|first7=Wolfgang|last8=Seidl|first8=Holger|title=Fecal calprotectin is a useful screening parameter for hepatic encephalopathy and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis|journal=Liver International|volume=31|issue=9|year=2011|pages=1406–1415|issn=14783223|doi=10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02577.x}}</ref>
* However, there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for SBP


==Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis==
==Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis==
===Natural History===
Early diagnosis and initiating treatment is the most important factor for improving the [[Survival rate|survival]] and avoiding the complications of SBP. The sooner the diagnosis, the better the outcome. Mortality due to SBP remains high probably due to associated advanced liver disease.
* Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is the most frequent and severe infectious complication in patients with cirrhosis and ascites, composing one-third of all bacterial infections and is more common than urinary tract infections and pneumonia in this population.
* SBP is a potentially fatal yet reversible cause of deterioration in patients with advanced cirrhosis.
* SBP usually occurs at the time of greatest ascites volume, but can be present in settings where the fluid is clinically undetectable.
* SBP in the absence of ascites is extremely unlikely
* The symptoms of Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) usually develop in the age group 41–50 years, with a mean of 49 years and start with symptoms such as Fever, abdominal pain, mental status changes, ileus and worsening of pre-existing ascites.
* The symptoms of SBP typically develop on exposure to various risk factors in patients with decompensated liver disease.
* All patients with cirrhosis and ascites with worsening clinical appearance and gastrointestinal bleeding should undergo diagnostic paracentesis to rule out SBP.
* Empirical antibiotic therapy is recommended after paracentesis if suspicion for infection exists.
* Without treatment, the patient will develop symptoms of renal failure and shock which will eventually lead to death of the patient.
* Delaying treatment until the culture results are available are also known to result in death of the patient from overwhelming sepsis
* Prophylaxis is safe and should be limited to high-risk settings.
* Mortality rates in SBP have declined dramatically in the recent years, largely due to earlier detection and improved therapy.
* Survivors of a prior episode of SBP are at increased risk for recurrence.<ref name="TitóRimola1988">{{cite journal|last1=Titó|first1=Llúcia|last2=Rimola|first2=Antoni|last3=Ginès|first3=Pere|last4=Llach|first4=Josep|last5=Arroyo|first5=Vicente|last6=Rodés|first6=Joan|title=Recurrence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: Frequency and predictive factors|journal=Hepatology|volume=8|issue=1|year=1988|pages=27–31|issn=02709139|doi=10.1002/hep.1840080107}}</ref>
* Approximately half of all deaths in patients with SBP occur after resolution of the infection and are from gastrointestinal hemorrhage or liver or renal failure
* The presence of renal insufficiency is the strongest independent prognostic indicator
 
===Complications===
* Complications that can develop as a result of SBP are:
** Rapidly progressive impairment in systemic hemodynamics, leading to severe renal and hepatic failure
** Aggravation of portal hypertension
** Gastrointestinal bleeding
** Ileus
** Shock, Sepsis
** Encephalopathy, and
** Death.
 
* Complications that can develop as a result of the treatment of SBP are:
** SBP resolves with antibiotics in approximately 90% of patients.
** Failure of antibiotic therapy is usually due to resistant bacteria or secondary bacterial peritonitis.
** Once secondary bacterial peritonitis has been excluded, antibiotics should be changed according to in vitro susceptibility of isolated organisms, or modified to alternative empiric broad spectrum agents
** Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis (primary or secondary) has led to the emergence of Gram-negative bacteria resistant to quinolones and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.
** In addition, there is an increased likelihood of infections from Gram-positive bacteria in patients who have received long-term SBP prophylaxis.
** This underlines the need to restrict the use of prophylactic antibiotics to patients with the greatest risk of SBP.
 
===Prognosis===
* Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is the most frequent infection in patients with cirrhosis.
* Once SBP develops, the prognosis of cirrhosis worsens.
* The presence of renal insufficiency is the strongest independent prognostic indicator, but the presence of peripheral leukocytosis, older age, higher Child-Pugh score, and the presence of an ileus have also been shown to predict inpatient mortality.
* Patients with hospital versus community-acquired SBP also appear to have a higher mortality.
* It is associated with high mortality at admission and its occurrence alters the natural course with a high 1 year mortality
* The median mortality during first episode of SBP has been reported to be around 30% (range 10-50%) and in such patients the median mortality at 1 year is reported to be about 66% (range 30-90%).
* Therefore, once a patient recovers from the 1st episode of SBP, he is advised to undergo liver transplant.
* However, the mortality associated with 1st episode of SBP, has reduced considerably during the last decade due to the awareness and identification of high risk cirrhotics likely to develop SBP, its early diagnosis and effective antibiotic strategy.
* The best predictor of survival is resolution of infection which is best influenced by effective first-line therapy since other factors such as Age, associated co-morbidities, site of acquisition of infection ( Community vs Nosocomial), severity of liver-dysfunction and genetic risk factors are not modifiable.
* Recurrence of SBP is high.  
* Therefore primary and secondary prophylaxis using appropriate antibiotics is recommended.
* However, in such patients, recent recognition of SBP with multidrug resistant bacteria has been associated with very high mortality and they are difficult to treat due to the presence of bacteria nonresponsive to community used antibiotics


==Diagnosis==
==Diagnosis==
According to the 2010 European Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines the diagnosis of SBP is based on:<ref>{{cite journal|title=EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis|journal=Journal of Hepatology|volume=53|issue=3|year=2010|pages=397–417|issn=01688278|doi=10.1016/j.jhep.2010.05.004}}</ref>
According to the 2010 European Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines the diagnosis of [[SBP]] is based on:<ref>{{cite journal|title=EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis|journal=Journal of Hepatology|volume=53|issue=3|year=2010|pages=397–417|issn=01688278|doi=10.1016/j.jhep.2010.05.004}}</ref>


* Diagnostic paracentesis:
* Diagnostic [[paracentesis]]:
** A diagnostic paracentesis should be carried out in all patients with cirrhosis and ascites at hospital admission to rule out SBP.  
** A diagnostic [[paracentesis]] should be carried out in all patients with cirrhosis and ascites at hospital admission to rule out [[SBP]].<ref name="pmid2946271">{{cite journal| author=Runyon BA| title=Paracentesis of ascitic fluid. A safe procedure. | journal=Arch Intern Med | year= 1986 | volume= 146 | issue= 11 | pages= 2259-61 | pmid=2946271 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=2946271  }} </ref><ref name="pmid19447197">{{cite journal| author=De Gottardi A, Thévenot T, Spahr L, Morard I, Bresson-Hadni S, Torres F et al.| title=Risk of complications after abdominal paracentesis in cirrhotic patients: a prospective study. | journal=Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol | year= 2009 | volume= 7 | issue= 8 | pages= 906-9 | pmid=19447197 | doi=10.1016/j.cgh.2009.05.004 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=19447197  }} </ref>
** A diagnostic paracentesis should also be performed in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, shock, fever, or other signs of systemic inflammation, gastrointestinal symptoms, as well as in patients with worsening liver and/or renal function, and hepatic encephalopathy (Level A1).
** A diagnostic paracentesis should also be performed in patients with [[gastrointestinal bleeding]], [[shock]], [[fever]], or other signs of systemic inflammation, gastrointestinal symptoms, as well as in patients with worsening liver and/or renal function, and [[hepatic encephalopathy]].
* Ascitic fluid cell analysis
* Ascitic fluid cell analysis
** The diagnosis of SBP is based on neutrophil count in ascitic fluid of >250/mm3 as determined by microscopy (Level A1).  
** The diagnosis of [[SBP]] is based on [[neutrophil]] count in ascitic fluid of >250/mm<sup>3</sup> as determined by microscopy.  
** At present there are insufficient data to recommend the use of automated cell counters or reagent strips for the rapid diagnosis of SBP.
** At present there are insufficient data to recommend the use of automated cell counters or reagent strips for the rapid diagnosis of [[SBP]].
* Ascitic fluid culture
* Ascitic fluid culture
** Ascitic fluid culture is frequently negative even if performed in blood culture bottles and is not necessary for the diagnosis of SBP, but it is important to guide antibiotic therapy (Level A1).  
** Ascitic fluid culture is frequently negative even if performed in blood culture bottles and is not necessary for the diagnosis of [[SBP]], but it is important to guide antibiotic therapy.  
** Blood cultures should be performed in all patients with suspected SBP before starting antibiotic treatment (Level A1).
** Blood cultures should be performed in all patients with suspected [[SBP]] before starting antibiotic treatment.
** Some patients may have an ascitic neutrophil count less than 250/mm3 but with a positive ascitic fluid culture. This condition is known as bacterascites.  
** Some patients may have an ascitic [[neutrophil]] count less than 250/mm<sup>3</sup> but with a positive ascitic fluid culture. This condition is known as bacterascites.  
** If the patient exhibits signs of systemic inflammation or infection, the patient should be treated with antibiotics (Level A1).  
** If the patient exhibits signs of systemic inflammation or infection, the patient should be treated with [[antibiotics]].  
** Otherwise, the patient should undergo a second paracentesis when culture results come back positive.  
** Otherwise, the patient should undergo a second [[paracentesis]] when culture results come back positive.  
** Patients in whom the repeat ascitic neutrophil count is >250/mm3 should be treated for SBP, and the remaining patients (i.e., neutrophils <250/mm3) should be followed up (Level B1).
** Patients in whom the repeat ascitic [[neutrophil]] count is >250/mm3 should be treated for [[SBP]], and the remaining patients (i.e., neutrophils <250/mm3) should be followed up .
===Diagnostic Criteria===
===Diagnostic Criteria===
The diagnosis of SBP was based on two of the following criteria from guidelines:<ref>{{cite journal|title=EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis|journal=Journal of Hepatology|volume=53|issue=3|year=2010|pages=397–417|issn=01688278|doi=10.1016/j.jhep.2010.05.004}}</ref>
The diagnosis of [[SBP]] is based on two of the following criteria from guidelines:<ref>{{cite journal|title=EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis|journal=Journal of Hepatology|volume=53|issue=3|year=2010|pages=397–417|issn=01688278|doi=10.1016/j.jhep.2010.05.004}}</ref>
<br>
<br>
(1) abdominal pain and/or hyperthermia, and/or abdominal and rebound tenderness (excluding secondary peritonitis);<br>
*[[Abdominal pain]] and/or [[hyperthermia]], and/or abdominal and [[rebound tenderness]] (excluding secondary peritonitis);<br>
(2) ascitic fluid PMN count ≥0.25 × 109/l;<br>
*[[Ascitic|Ascitic fluid]] [[PMN]] count 250 cells/mm<sup>3</sup><br>
(3) positive ascitic fluid bacterial culture.<br>
*Positive [[Ascitic|ascitic fluid]] [[Bacterial cultures|bacterial culture]].<br>
*  In the case of a traumatic [[paracentesis]], with the entry of blood into the [[Ascitic|ascitic fluid]] (typically ascitic red cells greater than 10,000 cells/mm3) the [[PMN]] count should be corrected by subtracting one [[PMN]] for every 250 red cells/mm<sup>3</sup> from the absolute [[PMN]] count.


===History and Symptoms===
===History and Symptoms===
Patients with SBP may have one of the following:<ref name="pmid9798013">{{cite journal| author=Such J, Runyon BA| title=Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. | journal=Clin Infect Dis | year= 1998 | volume= 27 | issue= 4 | pages= 669-74; quiz 675-6 | pmid=9798013 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=9798013  }} </ref><br>
80-90% of patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis are symptomatic, in many cases the presentation is subtle. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis may be present in 10–20% of patients hospitalized with [[chronic liver disease]], sometimes in the absence of any suggestive symptoms or signs. Patients with [[SBP]] most often present with: [[abdominal pain]], [[fever]], [[Decreased consciousness|altered mental status]] ([[Hepatic encephalopathy|hepatic encphalopathy]]).<ref name="pmid9798013">{{cite journal| author=Such J, Runyon BA| title=Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. | journal=Clin Infect Dis | year= 1998 | volume= 27 | issue= 4 | pages= 669-74; quiz 675-6 | pmid=9798013 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=9798013  }} </ref><ref name="pmid23473819">{{cite journal| author=Chinnock B, Hendey GW, Minnigan H, Butler J, Afarian H| title=Clinical impression and ascites appearance do not rule out bacterial peritonitis. | journal=J Emerg Med | year= 2013 | volume= 44 | issue= 5 | pages= 903-9 | pmid=23473819 | doi=10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.07.086 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=23473819  }} </ref>
(1) Local symptoms and/or signs of peritonitis: abdominal pain, abdominal tenderness, vomiting, diarrhea, ileum;<br>
(2) signs of systemic inflammation: hyper or hypothermia, chills, altered white blood cell count, tachycardia, and/or tachypnea;<br>
(3) worsening of liver function;<br>
(4) hepatic encephalopathy;<br>
(5) shock;<br>
(6) renal failure; and<br>
(7) gastrointestinal bleeding.<br>
* However, it is important to note that SBP may be asymptomatic, particularly in outpatients.
Journal of Hepatology 2010 vol. 53 j 397–417 403


===Physical Examination===
===Physical Examination===
* The clinical examination findings in Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis are usually unpredictable, so there should be a low threshold to consider SBP in any patient with cirrhosis.
The clinical examination findings in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis are usually unpredictable, so there should be a low threshold to consider [[SBP]] in any patient with cirrhosis. [[Fever|Fever]], acute [[abdominal pain|abdominal]] and [[altered mental status]] are the physical findings. Physical examination typically demonstrates signs of [[chronic liver disease]] with [[ascites]]. [[Abdominal tenderness]] is present in less than 50% of patients, and its presence suggests other processes.
* Fever, acute abdominal pain and tenderness and altered mental status are the routine physical findings.
* The patients are ill-appearing and are often noticed lying quietly supine, on the bed with the knees flexed and with frequent limited intercostal respirations because any motion intensifies the abdominal pain.
* Local abdominal signs of peritonitis:
** Guarding of the abdominal musculature
** Pain produced on coughing
** Tenderness on palpation or percussion
** Rebound tenderness
** Diminished bowel sounds


===Laboratory Findings===
===Laboratory Findings===
''' Early Diagnostic paracentesis''' (< 72hrs) is recommended in all [[Cirrhosis|cirrhotic patients]] with [[ascites]]. [[Paracentesis]] reveals an [[Ascitic|ascitic fluid]] with a total [[White blood cell (WBC) count|white cell count]] of up to 500 cells/mcL with a high [[PMNs|polymorphonuclear (PMN)]] cell count (250/mm<sup>3</sup> more). [[Ascitic|Ascitic fluid]] analysis and culture should be performed before initiating [[antibiotic therapy]] by bedside inoculation of [[Ascites|ascitIc fluid]] ≥ 10 mL into [[blood culture]] bottles. [[Ascitic|Ascitic fluid analysis]] is the [[Gold standard (test)|gold standard]] for the confirmation of the diagnosis of [[spontaneous bacterial peritonitis]].<ref name="pmid23978348">{{cite journal| author=Orman ES, Hayashi PH, Bataller R, Barritt AS| title=Paracentesis is associated with reduced mortality in patients hospitalized with cirrhosis and ascites. | journal=Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol | year= 2014 | volume= 12 | issue= 3 | pages= 496-503.e1 | pmid=23978348 | doi=10.1016/j.cgh.2013.08.025 | pmc=3944409 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=23978348  }} </ref><ref name="pmid2946271">{{cite journal| author=Runyon BA| title=Paracentesis of ascitic fluid. A safe procedure. | journal=Arch Intern Med | year= 1986 | volume= 146 | issue= 11 | pages= 2259-61 | pmid=2946271 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=2946271  }} </ref>


===Imaging Findings===
==Treatment==
===Medical Therapy===
====Empiric treatment====
* [[Ceftriaxone]] 1 g IV Q12H started as soon as possible after suspecting SBP.<ref name="pmid8775093">{{cite journal| author=Guarner C, Runyon BA| title=Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. | journal=Gastroenterologist | year= 1995 | volume= 3 | issue= 4 | pages= 311-28 | pmid=8775093 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=8775093  }} </ref>
* Severe [[pencillin allergy]]:
** [[Moxifloxacin]] 400 mg IV/PO Q24H.
* [[Renal dysfunction]]:
** Patients with serum.[[creatinine]] > 1 mg/dl, [[BUN]] >30 mg/dl or total [[bilirubin]] >4 mg/dl should receive [[albumin]](infusion25%) 1.5 g/kg on day 1 and 1 g/kg on day 3. including the standard [[antibiotic therapy]].<ref name="pmid22094025">{{cite journal| author=Poca M, Concepción M, Casas M, Alvarez-Urturi C, Gordillo J, Hernández-Gea V et al.| title=Role of albumin treatment in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. | journal=Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol | year= 2012 | volume= 10 | issue= 3 | pages= 309-15 | pmid=22094025 | doi=10.1016/j.cgh.2011.11.012 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=22094025  }} </ref><ref name="pmid23178229">{{cite journal| author=Salerno F, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM| title=Albumin infusion improves outcomes of patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. | journal=Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol | year= 2013 | volume= 11 | issue= 2 | pages= 123-30.e1 | pmid=23178229 | doi=10.1016/j.cgh.2012.11.007 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=23178229  }} </ref>


===Other Diagnostic Studies===
===Prevention===
The [[AASLD guidelines classification scheme|AASLD]] guidelines suggest using [[Antibiotic|long term antibiotic prophylaxis]] in patients with: [[Ascites|Ascitic fluid]] total [[protein]] less than 1.5 g/dL and with at least one of the following: Serum [[creatinine]] greater than or equal to 1.2 mg/dL, [[Blood urea nitrogen]] greater than or equal to 25 mg/dL, serum [[sodium]] less than or equal to 130 mEq/L, or [[Child-Pugh score|Child-Turcotte-Pugh]] greater than or equal to 9 points (with [[bilirubin]] greater than or equal to 3 mg/dL). Daily oral [[norfloxacin]] in patients with more advanced [[Liver diseases|liver disease]] has shown to  prevent the development of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and [[hepatorenal syndrome]] and improved survival rates at 3 months. [[Norfloxacin]] also reduced [[SBP]] recurrence rates from 68% to 20%.<ref name="pmid9148028">{{cite journal| author=Llovet JM, Rodríguez-Iglesias P, Moitinho E, Planas R, Bataller R, Navasa M et al.| title=Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis undergoing selective intestinal decontamination. A retrospective study of 229 spontaneous bacterial peritonitis episodes. | journal=J Hepatol | year= 1997 | volume= 26 | issue= 1 | pages= 88-95 | pmid=9148028 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=9148028  }} </ref>


==Treatment==
== Videos ==
===Medical Therapy===
 
{{#ev:youtube|xPEGzo_esTo}}
 
<br clear="left"/>


===Surgery===
{{#ev:youtube|M502Byuiskw}}


===Prevention===
<br clear="left"/>


==References==
==References==
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}
{{WikiDoc Help Menu}}
{{WikiDoc Sources}}
<references />


[[Category:Gastroenterology]]
[[Category:Gastroenterology]]
[[Category:Hepatology]]
[[Category:Hepatology]]
[[Category:Emergency mdicine]]
[[Category:Disease]]
[[Category:Up-To-Date]]
[[Category:Infectious disease]]
[[Category:Infectious disease]]
{{WikiDoc Help Menu}}
{{WikiDoc Sources}}

Latest revision as of 00:15, 30 July 2020

Peritonitis main page

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History & Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview

CDC on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview in the news

Blogs on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview

Directions to Hospitals Treating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shivani Chaparala M.B.B.S [2] Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [3]

Overview

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a form of peritonitis that occurs in most of the patients with advanced cirrhosis, in 10-30% of hospitalized patients with ascites and in various other clinical settings, such as nephrotic syndrome, heart failure, tuberculous infection, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for chronic renal failure.[1] [2] SBP is diagnosed with a positive bacterial culture for a single organism and an AF ( ascitic fluid) : polymorphonuclear (PMN) cell count of > 250/mm3, in the absence of a surgically treatable intra-abdominal source of infection. More than 60% of SBP episodes are caused by enteric gram-negative organisms such as Escherichia coli and Kleibsella. Selective intestinal decontamination (SID) with fluorinated quinolones suppresses the gram-negative intestinal flora and is known to reduce the incidence of SBP.[3][4] SBP results due to the inability of the gut to contain bacteria and failure of the immune system to eradicate the organisms once they have escaped into the blood stream. Clinical signs and symptoms are non specific and indistinguishable from secondary peritonitis. Ascitic fluid analysis is helpful in differentiating SBP from secondary peritonitis. Because of the lack of specificity and sensitivity of clinical signs and symptoms, cirrhotic patients with unexplained deterioration should undergo a diagnostic paracentesis. Once diagnosed, patients with SBP should receive prompt empiric antibiotic treatment ( Cephalosporins) without waiting for the ascitic fluid culture. Failure of prompt initiation of antibiotics results in significant and potentially fatal deterioration in the clinical status of the patient. Patients who survive an episode of SBP are at high risk of recurrence. Patients with cirrhosis and ascites developing abdominal pain and/or temperature >100F are more prone to have SBP and should receive empiric antibiotic treatment. Early detection and treatment improve outcome and prevent complications such as shock and renal failure.[5]

To see a comprehensive video about SBP, click here.

Historical Perspective

Kerr and colleagues (1963) described 11 episodes of ascitic fluid infection in 9 cirrhotic patients while Harold O.Conn , M.D, a world-renowned hepatologist (1964) introduced the term “spontaneous bacterial peritonitis” for the first time in English literature. Later in the history, SBP was studied extensively by many renowned researchers and health care professionals as this condition was seen among many patients with cirrhosis, which has lead to the thorough understanding and recognition of SBP.

Classification

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is one of the variants of ascitic fluid infections.[6]. Classification of ascitic fluid infections is based on neutrophil count and culture report.[7][8]. Asymptomatic bacterascites is usually the transient residence of bacteria in ascitic fluid without clinical features of peritonitis or increased ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear cells.[9]. SBP is also classified based on the routes of infection and the clinical setting as follows Health care-associated, Nosocomial, Community acquired, Multi-drug resistant, Recurrent.

Pathophysiology

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is thought to result from a combination of factors related to cirrhosis and ascites such as: altered microbial flora, hypo-motility of the intestine, intestinal bacterial overgrowth, increased intestinal mucosal permeability, bacterial translocation to lymph nodes. Presence of ascites is an important risk factor for the development of bacterial translocation. In healthy individuals, bacteria that colonize lymph nodes are killed by local immune defenses. However, in the setting of cirrhosis, an acquired state of immunodeficiency there is: malfunctioning of the reticulo-endothelial and neutrophilic system, reduced cellular and humoral bactericidal function which favor the spread of bacteria to the blood stream.[10][11][12]

Causes

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is a blood-borne infection caused by Enteric organisms in 70% of cases (Mono-microbial origin in 90% of cases). Aerobic gram-negative bacteria like Escherichia coli account for half of the cases. Gram-positive cocci Streptococcus species in 20% cases with enterococcus accounting for 5% of the cases. Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus salivarius are less frequent causes. Poly-microbial infection is Iatrogenic (more likely associated with abdominal paracentesis) or intra-abdominal source of infection. The cause of SBP has not been established definitively but is believed to involve hematogenous spread of organisms in a patient with a diseased liver and altered portal circulation resulting in defect in the usual filtration function. In adults, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis occurs most commonly in conjunction with cirrhosis of the liver and portal hypertension (frequently as a result of alcoholism and hepatitis).

Differentiating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis from Other Diseases

SBP has to be differentiated from other abdominal conditions presenting with fever and abdominal pain. It also has to be differentiated from secondary peritonitis, chemical peritonitis, peritoneal dialysis peritonitis, chronic tuberculous peritonitis.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a potentially life threatening complication in patients with cirrhosis and is seen in hospitalized patients. The prevalence of SBP in cirrhotic patients with ascites admitted to the hospital ranges from 10%-30%.[14]. Studies have demonstrated a 12% incidence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients admitted with decompensated cirrhosis. 2 studies examining asymptomatic patients presenting for a therapeutic paracentesis showed a combined 2.5% incidence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Overall one-year mortality rate after a first episode of SBP is 30%-93% regardless of its recurrence. The mean age of presentation of SBP was 49 years. There is no gender difference in the incidence of SBP in patients with ascites.

Risk Factors

Common risk factors in cirrhotic patients with ascites include: Low protein level in ascitic fluid (<1 g/dL), upper GI bleeding, low complement concentration (complement 3) in ascitic fluid, renal failure, Elevated serum bilirubin level (>4 mg/dL), use of Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) in cirrhotic patients, Child-Pugh stage C, Model For End-Stage Liver Disease MELD ≥ 22.[15]

Screening

There is no definitive screening test for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. According to Liver International journal, it has been demonstrated that fecal calprotectin concentrations (FCCs) are significantly elevated in cirrhotic patients and are dependent on the severity of liver disease. Assessing FCCs may help to identify cirrhotic patients with hepatic encephalopathy and SBP as a significant correlation emerged between elevated fecal calprotection and these complications.[16] However, there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for SBP.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Early diagnosis and initiating treatment is the most important factor for improving the survival and avoiding the complications of SBP. The sooner the diagnosis, the better the outcome. Mortality due to SBP remains high probably due to associated advanced liver disease.

Diagnosis

According to the 2010 European Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines the diagnosis of SBP is based on:[17]

  • Diagnostic paracentesis:
    • A diagnostic paracentesis should be carried out in all patients with cirrhosis and ascites at hospital admission to rule out SBP.[18][19]
    • A diagnostic paracentesis should also be performed in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, shock, fever, or other signs of systemic inflammation, gastrointestinal symptoms, as well as in patients with worsening liver and/or renal function, and hepatic encephalopathy.
  • Ascitic fluid cell analysis
    • The diagnosis of SBP is based on neutrophil count in ascitic fluid of >250/mm3 as determined by microscopy.
    • At present there are insufficient data to recommend the use of automated cell counters or reagent strips for the rapid diagnosis of SBP.
  • Ascitic fluid culture
    • Ascitic fluid culture is frequently negative even if performed in blood culture bottles and is not necessary for the diagnosis of SBP, but it is important to guide antibiotic therapy.
    • Blood cultures should be performed in all patients with suspected SBP before starting antibiotic treatment.
    • Some patients may have an ascitic neutrophil count less than 250/mm3 but with a positive ascitic fluid culture. This condition is known as bacterascites.
    • If the patient exhibits signs of systemic inflammation or infection, the patient should be treated with antibiotics.
    • Otherwise, the patient should undergo a second paracentesis when culture results come back positive.
    • Patients in whom the repeat ascitic neutrophil count is >250/mm3 should be treated for SBP, and the remaining patients (i.e., neutrophils <250/mm3) should be followed up .

Diagnostic Criteria

The diagnosis of SBP is based on two of the following criteria from guidelines:[20]

History and Symptoms

80-90% of patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis are symptomatic, in many cases the presentation is subtle. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis may be present in 10–20% of patients hospitalized with chronic liver disease, sometimes in the absence of any suggestive symptoms or signs. Patients with SBP most often present with: abdominal pain, fever, altered mental status (hepatic encphalopathy).[21][22]

Physical Examination

The clinical examination findings in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis are usually unpredictable, so there should be a low threshold to consider SBP in any patient with cirrhosis. Fever, acute abdominal and altered mental status are the physical findings. Physical examination typically demonstrates signs of chronic liver disease with ascites. Abdominal tenderness is present in less than 50% of patients, and its presence suggests other processes.

Laboratory Findings

Early Diagnostic paracentesis (< 72hrs) is recommended in all cirrhotic patients with ascites. Paracentesis reveals an ascitic fluid with a total white cell count of up to 500 cells/mcL with a high polymorphonuclear (PMN) cell count (250/mm3 more). Ascitic fluid analysis and culture should be performed before initiating antibiotic therapy by bedside inoculation of ascitIc fluid ≥ 10 mL into blood culture bottles. Ascitic fluid analysis is the gold standard for the confirmation of the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.[23][18]

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Empiric treatment

Prevention

The AASLD guidelines suggest using long term antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with: Ascitic fluid total protein less than 1.5 g/dL and with at least one of the following: Serum creatinine greater than or equal to 1.2 mg/dL, Blood urea nitrogen greater than or equal to 25 mg/dL, serum sodium less than or equal to 130 mEq/L, or Child-Turcotte-Pugh greater than or equal to 9 points (with bilirubin greater than or equal to 3 mg/dL). Daily oral norfloxacin in patients with more advanced liver disease has shown to prevent the development of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatorenal syndrome and improved survival rates at 3 months. Norfloxacin also reduced SBP recurrence rates from 68% to 20%.[4]

Videos

{{#ev:youtube|xPEGzo_esTo}}


{{#ev:youtube|M502Byuiskw}}


References

  1. Kato A, Ohtake T, Furuya R, Nakajima T, Ohura M, Kumagai H; et al. (1993). "Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in an adult patient with nephrotic syndrome". Intern Med. 32 (9): 719–21. PMID 8142677.
  2. Runyon BA (1984). "Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis associated with cardiac ascites". Am J Gastroenterol. 79 (10): 796. PMID 6486115.
  3. Soriano G, Guarner C, Teixidó M, Such J, Barrios J, Enríquez J; et al. (1991). "Selective intestinal decontamination prevents spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Gastroenterology. 100 (2): 477–81. PMID 1985045.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Llovet JM, Rodríguez-Iglesias P, Moitinho E, Planas R, Bataller R, Navasa M; et al. (1997). "Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis undergoing selective intestinal decontamination. A retrospective study of 229 spontaneous bacterial peritonitis episodes". J Hepatol. 26 (1): 88–95. PMID 9148028.
  5. Crossley IR, Williams R (1985). "Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Gut. 26 (4): 325–31. PMC 1432517. PMID 3884467.
  6. Sheer TA, Runyon BA (2005). "Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Dig Dis. 23 (1): 39–46. doi:10.1159/000084724. PMID 15920324.
  7. Dever JB, Sheikh MY (2015) Review article: spontaneous bacterial peritonitis--bacteriology, diagnosis, treatment, risk factors and prevention. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 41 (11):1116-31. DOI:10.1111/apt.13172 PMID: 25819304
  8. Runyon BA, AASLD Practice Guidelines Committee (2009). "Management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis: an update". Hepatology. 49 (6): 2087–107. doi:10.1002/hep.22853. PMID 19475696.
  9. Pelletier G, Lesur G, Ink O, Hagege H, Attali P, Buffet C; et al. (1991). "Asymptomatic bacterascites: is it spontaneous bacterial peritonitis?". Hepatology. 14 (1): 112–5. PMID 2066060.
  10. Tsiaoussis GI, Assimakopoulos SF, Tsamandas AC, Triantos CK, Thomopoulos KC (2015). "Intestinal barrier dysfunction in cirrhosis: Current concepts in pathophysiology and clinical implications". World J Hepatol. 7 (17): 2058–68. doi:10.4254/wjh.v7.i17.2058. PMC 4539399. PMID 26301048.
  11. Runyon BA, Squier S, Borzio M (1994). "Translocation of gut bacteria in rats with cirrhosis to mesenteric lymph nodes partially explains the pathogenesis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". J Hepatol. 21 (5): 792–6. PMID 7890896.
  12. Bauer TM, Steinbrückner B, Brinkmann FE, Ditzen AK, Schwacha H, Aponte JJ; et al. (2001). "Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with cirrhosis: prevalence and relation with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Am J Gastroenterol. 96 (10): 2962–7. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04668.x. PMID 11693333.
  13. Rimola A, Soto R, Bory F, Arroyo V, Piera C, Rodes J (1984). "Reticuloendothelial system phagocytic activity in cirrhosis and its relation to bacterial infections and prognosis". Hepatology. 4 (1): 53–8. PMID 6693068.
  14. Oladimeji AA, Temi AP, Adekunle AE, Taiwo RH, Ayokunle DS (2013). "Prevalence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in liver cirrhosis with ascites". Pan Afr Med J. 15: 128. doi:10.11604/pamj.2013.15.128.2702. PMC 3830462. PMID 24255734.
  15. Schwabl P, Bucsics T, Soucek K, Mandorfer M, Bota S, Blacky A; et al. (2015). "Risk factors for development of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and subsequent mortality in cirrhotic patients with ascites". Liver Int. 35 (9): 2121–8. doi:10.1111/liv.12795. PMID 25644943.
  16. Gundling, Felix; Schmidtler, Fabian; Hapfelmeier, Alexander; Schulte, Benjamin; Schmidt, Thomas; Pehl, Christian; Schepp, Wolfgang; Seidl, Holger (2011). "Fecal calprotectin is a useful screening parameter for hepatic encephalopathy and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis". Liver International. 31 (9): 1406–1415. doi:10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02577.x. ISSN 1478-3223.
  17. "EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis". Journal of Hepatology. 53 (3): 397–417. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2010.05.004. ISSN 0168-8278.
  18. 18.0 18.1 Runyon BA (1986). "Paracentesis of ascitic fluid. A safe procedure". Arch Intern Med. 146 (11): 2259–61. PMID 2946271.
  19. De Gottardi A, Thévenot T, Spahr L, Morard I, Bresson-Hadni S, Torres F; et al. (2009). "Risk of complications after abdominal paracentesis in cirrhotic patients: a prospective study". Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 7 (8): 906–9. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.05.004. PMID 19447197.
  20. "EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis". Journal of Hepatology. 53 (3): 397–417. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2010.05.004. ISSN 0168-8278.
  21. Such J, Runyon BA (1998). "Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Clin Infect Dis. 27 (4): 669–74, quiz 675-6. PMID 9798013.
  22. Chinnock B, Hendey GW, Minnigan H, Butler J, Afarian H (2013). "Clinical impression and ascites appearance do not rule out bacterial peritonitis". J Emerg Med. 44 (5): 903–9. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.07.086. PMID 23473819.
  23. Orman ES, Hayashi PH, Bataller R, Barritt AS (2014). "Paracentesis is associated with reduced mortality in patients hospitalized with cirrhosis and ascites". Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 12 (3): 496–503.e1. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.08.025. PMC 3944409. PMID 23978348.
  24. Guarner C, Runyon BA (1995). "Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management". Gastroenterologist. 3 (4): 311–28. PMID 8775093.
  25. Poca M, Concepción M, Casas M, Alvarez-Urturi C, Gordillo J, Hernández-Gea V; et al. (2012). "Role of albumin treatment in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 10 (3): 309–15. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2011.11.012. PMID 22094025.
  26. Salerno F, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM (2013). "Albumin infusion improves outcomes of patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials". Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 11 (2): 123–30.e1. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.11.007. PMID 23178229.


Template:WikiDoc Sources