Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis natural history: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (Bot: Removing from Primary care)
 
(62 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis}}
{{Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis}}
{{CMG}} ; {{AE}} {{ADI}}
{{CMG}} ; {{AE}}{{SCh}} {{AY}}


==Overview==
==Overview==
Early diagnosis and initiating treatment is the most important factor for improving the [[Survival rate|survival]] and avoiding the complications of SBP. The sooner the diagnosis, the better the outcome.


==Natural History , Complications and Prognosis==
==Natural history==
[[Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis]] presents as a complication of [[ascites]] which can be due to [[cirrhosis]] , [[heart failure]] or [[renal failure]]. Untreated disease leads to complications and has poor prognosis.
*SBP is treatable with [[antibiotics]] but early diagnosis and intiation of [[Antibiotic therapy|empiric antibiotic therapy]] is the most important factor for survival.
===Complications===
*In a study performed in 2006, Each hour of delay of administration of empiric antibiotics was associated with increased [[Mortality rate|mortality]] by 7.6% while administration of [[antibiotics]] at the first hour of [[hypotension]] increased overall survival to 79%.<ref name="pmid16625125">{{cite journal |vauthors=Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, Light B, Parrillo JE, Sharma S, Suppes R, Feinstein D, Zanotti S, Taiberg L, Gurka D, Kumar A, Cheang M |title=Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock |journal=Crit. Care Med. |volume=34 |issue=6 |pages=1589–96 |year=2006 |pmid=16625125 |doi=10.1097/01.CCM.0000217961.75225.E9 |url=}}</ref>
* [[Sepsis]]
 
* [[Encephalopathy]]
==Complications==
* [[Liver failure]]
The physician should have a high index of suspicion to diagnose SBP early and start empiric antibiotic therapy. The earlier the stage of diagnosis, the better the survival.
* [[Renal failure]]
===Hypotension, hypothermia and shock:===
* Tense [[ascites]]  
*With the progression of [[infection]], [[septicaemia]] ensues with its classic symptoms and signs. [[Septicaemia]] and [[shock]] are associated with very bad prognosis.
* [[Coma]]
===Altered mental status:===
* [[Death]]
*[[Liver diseases|Hepatic decompensation]] in association with the progression of [[infection]] make [[altered mental status]] more likely to happen. [[Ammonia]] levels can be within normal limits or slightly elevated as [[Liver diseases|hepatic decompensation]] is not the only element leading to the [[altered mental status]].
===Paralytic ileus:===
*[[Peritonitis|Peritoneal inflammation]] can be complicated with [[paralytic ileus]]. [[Paralytic ileus]] is a very poor prognostic sign with increased [[mortality rate]].
===Diarrhea:===
*[[Diarrhea]] is common due to associated [[Bacterial overgrowth|intestinal bacterial overgrowth]].<ref name="pmid9210626">{{cite journal |vauthors=Guarner C, Runyon BA, Young S, Heck M, Sheikh MY |title=Intestinal bacterial overgrowth and bacterial translocation in cirrhotic rats with ascites |journal=J. Hepatol. |volume=26 |issue=6 |pages=1372–8 |year=1997 |pmid=9210626 |doi= |url=}}</ref>
 
==Prognosis==
 
*[[Mortality rate|Mortality]] of SBP remains high. 1-year [[mortality rate]] is 30-90% <ref name="pmid25253362">{{cite journal |vauthors=Sundaram V, Manne V, Al-Osaimi AM |title=Ascites and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: recommendations from two United States centers |journal=Saudi J Gastroenterol |volume=20 |issue=5 |pages=279–87 |year=2014 |pmid=25253362 |pmc=4196342 |doi=10.4103/1319-3767.141686 |url=}}</ref>, probably due to the advanced [[Liver diseases|liver disease]] present in the first place.
*Early admission and [[Cephalosporins|prophylactic cephalosporins]] might have a role in decreasing [[mortality rate]].<ref name="urlSpontaneous bacterial peritonis - ScienceDirect">{{cite web |url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0011502985900021?via%3Dihub |title=Spontaneous bacterial peritonis - ScienceDirect |format= |work= |accessdate=}}</ref>
 
==References==
{{reflist|2}}
 
[[Category:Gastroenterology]]
[[Category:Emergency medicine]]
[[Category:Emergency mdicine]]
[[Category:Disease]]
[[Category:Up-To-Date]]
[[Category:Infectious disease]]

Latest revision as of 00:15, 30 July 2020

Peritonitis main page

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History & Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis natural history On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis natural history

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis natural history

CDC on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis natural history

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis natural history in the news

Blogs on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis natural history

Directions to Hospitals Treating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis natural history

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shivani Chaparala M.B.B.S [2] Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [3]

Overview

Early diagnosis and initiating treatment is the most important factor for improving the survival and avoiding the complications of SBP. The sooner the diagnosis, the better the outcome.

Natural history

  • SBP is treatable with antibiotics but early diagnosis and intiation of empiric antibiotic therapy is the most important factor for survival.
  • In a study performed in 2006, Each hour of delay of administration of empiric antibiotics was associated with increased mortality by 7.6% while administration of antibiotics at the first hour of hypotension increased overall survival to 79%.[1]

Complications

The physician should have a high index of suspicion to diagnose SBP early and start empiric antibiotic therapy. The earlier the stage of diagnosis, the better the survival.

Hypotension, hypothermia and shock:

Altered mental status:

Paralytic ileus:

Diarrhea:

Prognosis

References

  1. Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, Light B, Parrillo JE, Sharma S, Suppes R, Feinstein D, Zanotti S, Taiberg L, Gurka D, Kumar A, Cheang M (2006). "Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock". Crit. Care Med. 34 (6): 1589–96. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000217961.75225.E9. PMID 16625125.
  2. Guarner C, Runyon BA, Young S, Heck M, Sheikh MY (1997). "Intestinal bacterial overgrowth and bacterial translocation in cirrhotic rats with ascites". J. Hepatol. 26 (6): 1372–8. PMID 9210626.
  3. Sundaram V, Manne V, Al-Osaimi AM (2014). "Ascites and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: recommendations from two United States centers". Saudi J Gastroenterol. 20 (5): 279–87. doi:10.4103/1319-3767.141686. PMC 4196342. PMID 25253362.
  4. "Spontaneous bacterial peritonis - ScienceDirect".