Coronary angiography film quality: Difference between revisions
Gerald Chi (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Gerald Chi- (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
(20 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{| class="infobox" style="float:right;" | |||
|- | |||
| [[File:Siren.gif|30px|link=Cardiac catheterization pre-procedure evaluation resident survival guide]]|| <br> || <br> | |||
| [[Cardiac catheterization pre-procedure evaluation resident survival guide|'''Resident'''<br>'''Survival'''<br>'''Guide''']] | |||
|} | |||
{{Coronary angiography2}} | {{Coronary angiography2}} | ||
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{VC}} | {{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{VC}} | ||
==Coronary Angiography | == Cine Film Quality of Coronary Angiography == | ||
=== Uninterpretable === | |||
The primary endpoint cannot be analyzed secondary to exceedingly poor film exposure or quality (e.g., no images on the film, insufficient contrast injection). | |||
=== Poor === | |||
The primary endpoint can be analyzed with some degree of uncertainty secondary to under- or over-exposure, poor panning, poor engagement, insufficient contrast injection, injection prior to cine-filming, inadequate cine-filming duration, excess collimation, partial obscuration by the diaphragm, and/or omission of images showing major coronary arteries (left or right coronary system). | |||
=== Average === | |||
The primary endpoint can be analyzed. Some images show under- or over-exposure, poor panning, poor engagement, insufficient contrast injection, injection prior to cine-filming, inadequate cine-filming duration, excess collimation, and/or partial obscuration by the diaphragm. | |||
=== Good === | |||
The primary endpoint can be analyzed. Most images show proper exposure, proper panning, proper engagement, sufficient contrast injection, injection after cine-filming, adequate cine-filming duration, minimal collimation, and minimal obscuration by the diaphragm. | |||
=== Excellent === | |||
The primary endpoint can be analyzed. All images show proper exposure, proper panning, proper engagement, sufficient contrast injection, injection after cine-filming, adequate cine-filming duration, minimal collimation, and minimal obscuration by the diaphragm. The culprit lesion is centered in the film during some portion of the cine run to minimize pincushion distortion for quantitative analysis. The culprit lesion is well laid out with no overlap of branches and orthogonal views are obtained to show the culprit lesion in its tightest dimension. | |||
The primary endpoint can be analyzed. All images show proper exposure, proper panning, proper engagement, | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | {{Reflist|2}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:30, 23 November 2015
Resident Survival Guide |
Coronary Angiography | |
General Principles | |
---|---|
Anatomy & Projection Angles | |
Normal Anatomy | |
Anatomic Variants | |
Projection Angles | |
Epicardial Flow & Myocardial Perfusion | |
Epicardial Flow | |
Myocardial Perfusion | |
Lesion Complexity | |
ACC/AHA Lesion-Specific Classification of the Primary Target Stenosis | |
Lesion Morphology | |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vanessa Cherniauskas, M.D. [2]
Cine Film Quality of Coronary Angiography
Uninterpretable
The primary endpoint cannot be analyzed secondary to exceedingly poor film exposure or quality (e.g., no images on the film, insufficient contrast injection).
Poor
The primary endpoint can be analyzed with some degree of uncertainty secondary to under- or over-exposure, poor panning, poor engagement, insufficient contrast injection, injection prior to cine-filming, inadequate cine-filming duration, excess collimation, partial obscuration by the diaphragm, and/or omission of images showing major coronary arteries (left or right coronary system).
Average
The primary endpoint can be analyzed. Some images show under- or over-exposure, poor panning, poor engagement, insufficient contrast injection, injection prior to cine-filming, inadequate cine-filming duration, excess collimation, and/or partial obscuration by the diaphragm.
Good
The primary endpoint can be analyzed. Most images show proper exposure, proper panning, proper engagement, sufficient contrast injection, injection after cine-filming, adequate cine-filming duration, minimal collimation, and minimal obscuration by the diaphragm.
Excellent
The primary endpoint can be analyzed. All images show proper exposure, proper panning, proper engagement, sufficient contrast injection, injection after cine-filming, adequate cine-filming duration, minimal collimation, and minimal obscuration by the diaphragm. The culprit lesion is centered in the film during some portion of the cine run to minimize pincushion distortion for quantitative analysis. The culprit lesion is well laid out with no overlap of branches and orthogonal views are obtained to show the culprit lesion in its tightest dimension.