Liver mass classification: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Classification== | ==Classification== | ||
Liver mass may be classified according to imaging features, histopathological origin, size, and distribution. | Liver mass may be classified according to imaging features, histopathological origin, size, content, and distribution. | ||
*'''Imaging features''' | *'''Imaging features''' | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:*Single (also known as "solitary" or "focal") | :*Single (also known as "solitary" or "focal") | ||
:*Multiple | :*Multiple | ||
*'''Content''' | |||
:*Solid | |||
:*Cystic | |||
*The table below summarizes the classification of common liver masses according to histopathological origin. | *The table below summarizes the classification of common liver masses according to histopathological origin. |
Revision as of 15:37, 25 March 2016
Liver Mass Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Liver mass classification On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Liver mass classification |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Liver mass classification |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Maria Fernanda Villarreal, M.D. [2]
Overview
Liver mass may be classified according to imaging features (hyperechoic vs. hypoechoic), histopathological origin (benign vs. malignant), and distribution (single/focal/solitary vs. multiple).[1]
Classification
Liver mass may be classified according to imaging features, histopathological origin, size, content, and distribution.
- Imaging features
- Hyperechoic
- Hypoechoic
- Histopathological origin
- Benign
- Malignant
- Distribution
- Single (also known as "solitary" or "focal")
- Multiple
- Content
- Solid
- Cystic
- The table below summarizes the classification of common liver masses according to histopathological origin.
Classification of liver mass | ||
---|---|---|
Benign | Malignant | |
|
|
References
- ↑ Mergo PJ, Ros PR. Benign Lesions of the Liver. In: The Radiologic Clinics of North America, 2, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia 1998. Vol 36, p.319.