Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis echocardiography or ultrasound: Difference between revisions
Ahmed Younes (talk | contribs) |
Ahmed Younes (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis}} | {{Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis}} | ||
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{ADI}} | {{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{ADI}}{{AY}} | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== |
Revision as of 18:30, 25 April 2017
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Microchapters |
Differentiating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis from other Diseases |
Diagnosis |
Treatment |
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis echocardiography or ultrasound On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis echocardiography or ultrasound |
FDA on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis echocardiography or ultrasound |
CDC on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis echocardiography or ultrasound |
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis echocardiography or ultrasound in the news |
Blogs on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis echocardiography or ultrasound |
Directions to Hospitals Treating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [2]Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [3]
Overview
Echocardiography may be used in evaluation of heart failure while ultrasound used in assessing ascites and liver disease.
Echocardiography
- Evaluation of heart failure
Ultrasound
- It helps in identifying the ascitic fluid volume.
- Used as preliminary test before paracentesis.
- Detection of paracentesis complications like hemoperitoneum