Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome medical therapy: Difference between revisions
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
<span style="font-size:85%;color:red">[[Contraindication|<span style="color:red">Contraindications:</span>]] [[asthma|<span style="color:red">asthma,</span>]] [[Second degree AV block|<span style="color:red">second degree AV block</span>]] or [[Third degree AV block|<span style="color:red">third degree AV block</span>]] unless a [[Artificial pacemaker|<span style="color:red">pacemaker</span>]] is present</span> | <span style="font-size:85%;color:red">[[Contraindication|<span style="color:red">Contraindications:</span>]] [[asthma|<span style="color:red">asthma,</span>]] [[Second degree AV block|<span style="color:red">second degree AV block</span>]] or [[Third degree AV block|<span style="color:red">third degree AV block</span>]] unless a [[Artificial pacemaker|<span style="color:red">pacemaker</span>]] is present</span> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left |'''[[Synchronized cardioversion]] in [[unstable hemodynamic]] and ineffectiveness of [[vagal maneuver]] or adenosin: ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|Class I, Level of Evidence B]])''' | |style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left |'''[[Synchronized cardioversion]] in [[unstable hemodynamic]] or stable hemodynamic and ineffectiveness of [[vagal maneuver]] or adenosin: ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|Class I, Level of Evidence B]])''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|❑ Highly effective in termination of AVRT<br> | |style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|❑ Highly effective in termination of AVRT<br> |
Revision as of 13:48, 15 September 2020
Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome Microchapters |
Differentiating Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome from other Diseases |
---|
Diagnosis |
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome medical therapy On the Web |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome medical therapy |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor-In-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2]; Rim Halaby, M.D. [3]
Overview
Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome patients who are hemodynamically unstable, as reflected by the presence of hypotension, cold extremities, mottling or peripheral cyanosis, or those who present with ischemic chest pain or decompensated heart failure should urgently undergo direct current cardioversion.[1] The medical therapy of hemodynamically stable patients with WPW syndrome depends on the type of the tachycardia. When the ECG findings suggest orthodromic AVRT, the patient should be managed similarly to patients with supreventricular tachycardia followed by the sequential administration of adenosine, verapamil and procainamide in case of failure to improve. Among patients with antidromic AVRT, AV nodal blocking agents should be avoided and patients should be treated with either procainamide, ibutilide or flecainide.[2] In case of WPW syndrome with atrial fibrillation in hemodynamically stable patients, procainamide, ibutilide or flecainide can be administered.[3] The long term treatment of patients with WPW syndrome depends on the presence or absence of symptoms and their severity. Patients who have poorly tolerated symptomatic WPW syndrome should undergo [[catheter ablation.[2]
Acute Treatment
Atrioventricular Reentrant Tachycardia (AVRT)
- AVRT is one of the type of tachycardia that can occur in patients with WPW pattern. AVRT can be either orthodromic or antidromic, and the distinction between the two types is important because it dictates the choice of treatment.
Hemodynamically Unstable Patients
- WPW syndrome patients with AVRT who are hemodynamically unstable, as reflected by the presence of hypotension, cold extremities, mottling or peripheral cyanosis, or those who present with ischemic chest pain or decompensated heart failure should urgently undergo direct current cardioversion. The shocks should be delivered as follows:
- Narrow regular rhythm: synchronized electrical cardioversion, 50-100 Joules
- Narrow irregular rhythm: synchronized electrical cardioversion, 120-200 Joules biphasic or 200 Joules monophasic
- Wide regular rhythm: synchronized electrical cardioversion, 100 Joules
- Wide irregular rhythm: unsynchronized electrical cardioversion, 200-360 Joules monophasic, or 100-200 Joules biphasic[1]
Orthodromic AVRT in Hemodynamically Stable Patients
- The management of WPW syndrome patients who are hemodynamically stable depends on the type of AVRT. When the ECG findings suggest orthodromic AVRT, the patient should be managed similarly to patients with supreventricular tachycardia. The management should begin with vagal maneuvers such as carotid sinus massage and valsalva maneuver. If the patient's tachycardia does not resolve, the patient should be administered IV adenosine. In case of failure to improve, administration of verapamil must be considered followed by procainamide.[2]
The sequence of therapeutic decisions is summarized below.
Recommendations for acute treatment of orthodromic AVRT |
Vagal maneuver (Class I, Level of Evidence B): |
❑ Carotid sinus massage for 5-10 seconds in the absent of bruit |
Adenosin(Class I, Level of Evidence B) : |
❑ Effective in conversion of AVRT in 90-95% patients |
Synchronized cardioversion in unstable hemodynamic or stable hemodynamic and ineffectiveness of vagal maneuver or adenosin: (Class I, Level of Evidence B) |
❑ Highly effective in termination of AVRT ❑ Avoidance of complications associated antiarrhythmic drugs |
If verapamil is not effective: |
❑ Administer procainamide, 100 mg infusion diluted to 100mg/ml at a rate of 25-50 mg/min every 5 minutes (Class I, Level of Evidence B) ❑ Give until the arrhythmia is suppressed or up to 500 mg |
Recommendations for acute treatment of orthodromic AVRT | |
Perform the following maneuvers (Class I, Level of Evidence B): | |
❑ Vagal maneuvers | |
If not effective initiate the IV AV nodal blocking agent adenosine: | |
❑ Administer adenosine 6 mg IV (bolus) (Class I, Level of Evidence A) ❑ If the initial dose is not effective, administer a second dose of 12 mg, repeated a second time if required | |
If adenosine is not effective: | |
❑ Administer verapamil 5 to 10 mg (0.075 to 0.15 mg/kg body weight) IV boluses of over 2 minutes (Class I, Level of Evidence A) ❑ Give 30% of the dose in case of hepatic impairment | |
If verapamil is not effective: | |
❑ Administer procainamide, 100 mg infusion diluted to 100mg/ml at a rate of 25-50 mg/min every 5 minutes (Class I, Level of Evidence B) ❑ Give until the arrhythmia is suppressed or up to 500 mg |
If verapamil is not effective: |
❑ Administer procainamide, 100 mg infusion diluted to 100mg/ml at a rate of 25-50 mg/min every 5 minutes (Class I, Level of Evidence B) ❑ Give until the arrhythmia is suppressed or up to 500 mg |
If verapamil is not effective: |
❑ Administer procainamide, 100 mg infusion diluted to 100mg/ml at a rate of 25-50 mg/min every 5 minutes (Class I, Level of Evidence B) ❑ Give until the arrhythmia is suppressed or up to 500 mg |
If verapamil is not effective: |
❑ Administer procainamide, 100 mg infusion diluted to 100mg/ml at a rate of 25-50 mg/min every 5 minutes (Class I, Level of Evidence B) ❑ Give until the arrhythmia is suppressed or up to 500 mg |
Antidromic AVRT in Hemodynamically Stable Patients
- In antidromic AVRT, the antegrade conduction of the electrical signals occurs through the accessory pathway, while the retrograde conduction occurs through either the AV node or a second accessory pathway. Therefore, among patients with antidromic AVRT, AV nodal blocking agents should be avoided because they are ineffective in the subset of patients among whom the retrograde conduction occurs through a second accessory pathway rather than through the AV node. In this case, the use of digoxin, calcium channel blockers, beta blockers and adenosine should be avoided. Adenosine, in particular, might lead to atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Patients should be treated with either procainamide, ibutilide, or flecainide.[2]
Treatment of Antidromic AVRT in Hemodynamically Stable Patients | ||
Medication | Dosage | Notes |
Procainamide | 100 mg infusion diluted to 100mg/ml at a rate of 25-50 mg/min every 5 minutes | ❑ Give until the arrhythmia is suppressed or until 500 mg has been administered ❑ Wait 10 minutes or longer to administer new dosage |
Ibutilide | 1 mg IV infusion over 10 minutes | ❑ Repeat the dosage if the tachycardia continues Contraindications: hypersensitivity to ibutilide or any component of the formulation, QTc >440 msec |
Flecainide | 50 mg every 12 hours | ❑ Increase 50mg BID every four days until efficacy is achieved ❑ Maximum dose recommended for supraventricular tachycardia is 300 mg/day |
Atrial Fibrillation
- WPW syndrome with atrial fibrillation should be suspected whenever the ECG reveals an irregular rhythm with absent P wave in the presence of a heart rate more than 220 beats per minute.
Hemodynamically Unstable Patients
In hemodynamically unstable patients, urgent direct current cardioversion should be performed.[1]
Hemodynamically Stable Patients
- Hemodynamically stable patients can be administered any of the following intravenous medications:
- Procainamide (Class I, Level of evidence C)- in the presence of wide QRS on ECG or a rapid preexcited ventricular response
- Ibutilide (Class I, Level of evidence C)- in the presence of wide QRS on ECG or a rapid preexcited ventricular response
- Flecainide (Class IIa, Level of evidence B)
- Quinidine (Class IIb, Level of evidence B)
- Procainamide (Class IIb, Level of evidence B)
- Disopyramide (Class IIb, Level of evidence B)
- Ibutilide (Class IIb, Level of evidence B)
- Amiodarone(Class IIb, Level of evidence B)[3]
- AV nodal blocking drugs, such as adenosine, verapamil, digoxin, and beta blockers must be avoided.
Long Term Treatment
The long term management of patients with WPW syndrome depends on the presence or absence of syndrome. Among symptomatic patients, the tolerability of the symptoms guides the choice of the long term treatment.[2]
Asymptomatic Patients
- Asymptomatic patients can either receive no treatment (Class I, Level of Evidence C) or can undergo catheter ablation (Class IIa, Level of Evidence B).[2]
Symptomatic Patients
- Patients who have poorly tolerated symptoms or atrial fibrillation with rapid conduction should be treated with catheter ablation (Class I, Level of Evidence B).[2]
- Patients who have well tolerated symptoms can be treated with any of the following:
- AV nodal blocking agents such as digoxin, verapamil and diltiazem should not be administered to patients with WPW syndrome and atrial fibrillation (Class III, Level of Evidence C).[2]
Contraindicated medications
WPW SYNDROME is considered an absolute contraindication to the use of the following medications:
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 "Part 8: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support". Retrieved 3 April 2014.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 "ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Supraventricular Arrhythmias—Executive Summary". Retrieved 15 August 2013.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 American College of Cardiology Foundation. American Heart Association. European Society of Cardiology. Heart Rhythm Society. Wann LS, Curtis AB; et al. (2013). "Management of patients with atrial fibrillation (compilation of 2006 ACCF/AHA/ESC and 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS recommendations): a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines". Circulation. 127 (18): 1916–26. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e318290826d. PMID 23545139.