Coronary angiography film quality: Difference between revisions
Gerald Chi- (talk | contribs) |
Gerald Chi- (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
====Good==== | ====Good==== | ||
The primary endpoint can be analyzed. Most images show proper exposure, proper panning, proper engagement, sufficient contrast injection, injection after cinefilming, adequate cinefilming duration, minimal collimation, and | The primary endpoint can be analyzed. Most images show proper exposure, proper panning, proper engagement, sufficient contrast injection, injection after cinefilming, adequate cinefilming duration, minimal collimation, and minimal obscuration by the diaphragm. | ||
====Excellent==== | ====Excellent==== |
Revision as of 19:22, 6 April 2014
Coronary Angiography | |
General Principles | |
---|---|
Anatomy & Projection Angles | |
Normal Anatomy | |
Anatomic Variants | |
Projection Angles | |
Epicardial Flow & Myocardial Perfusion | |
Epicardial Flow | |
Myocardial Perfusion | |
Lesion Complexity | |
ACC/AHA Lesion-Specific Classification of the Primary Target Stenosis | |
Lesion Morphology | |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vanessa Cherniauskas, M.D. [2]
Coronary Angiography Film Quality
Uninterpretable
The primary endpoint cannot be analyzed secondary to exceedingly poor film exposure or quality (i.e. no images on the film, inadequate injection of contrast material, etc.).
Poor
The primary endpoint can be analyzed with some degree of uncertainty secondary to under- or overexposure, poor panning, poor engagement, insufficient contrast injection, injection prior to cinefilming, inadequate cinefilming duration, excess collimation, partial obscuration by the diaphragm, and/or omission of images showing major coronary arteries (left or right coronary system).
Average
The primary endpoint can be analyzed. Some images show under- or overexposure, poor panning, poor engagement, insufficient contrast injection, injection prior to cinefilming, inadequate cinefilming duration, excess collimation, and/or partial obscuration by the diaphragm.
Good
The primary endpoint can be analyzed. Most images show proper exposure, proper panning, proper engagement, sufficient contrast injection, injection after cinefilming, adequate cinefilming duration, minimal collimation, and minimal obscuration by the diaphragm.
Excellent
The primary endpoint can be analyzed. All images show proper exposure, proper panning, proper engagement, sufficient contrast injection, injection after cinefilming, adequate cinefilming duration, minimal collimation, and/or minimal obscuration by the diaphragm.