Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis laboratory findings: Difference between revisions
Line 186: | Line 186: | ||
|} | |} | ||
Given the similarities in presentation between the variants of ascitic fluid infection and the inability to clinically distinguish spontaneous from [[secondary peritonitis]], the diagnosis of SBP should be through abdominal paracentesis as it has been shown to be safe with a low risk for complication, even in patients with marked coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia. | Given the similarities in presentation between the variants of ascitic fluid infection and the inability to clinically distinguish spontaneous from [[secondary peritonitis]], the diagnosis of SBP should be through abdominal paracentesis as it has been shown to be safe with a low risk for complication, even in patients with marked coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia. | ||
===Ascitic Fluid Analysis=== | ===Ascitic Fluid Analysis=== |
Revision as of 03:01, 29 January 2017
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Microchapters |
Differentiating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis from other Diseases |
Diagnosis |
Treatment |
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis laboratory findings On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis laboratory findings |
FDA on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis laboratory findings |
CDC on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis laboratory findings |
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis laboratory findings in the news |
Blogs on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis laboratory findings |
Directions to Hospitals Treating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis laboratory findings |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [2] Guillermo Rodriguez Nava, M.D. [3] Shivani Chaparala M.B.B.S [4]
Overview
- Diagnosis requires paracentesis (needle drainage of the ascitic fluid).
- Ascitic fluid culture is negative in up to 60% of patients with clinical manifestations of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP)
- Therefore, the diagnosis of SBP is based on the neutrophil count, which reaches its highest sensitivity with a cutoff neutrophil count of > 250/mm3.[1]
- Leukocytosis and acidosis may be present, but they are non-specific findings.
- If reasonable doubt still persists, an exploratory peritoneal lavage may be performed (e.g. in the case of trauma, in order to look for white blood cells, red blood cells, or bacteria).
Laboratory Findings
Laboratory tests for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of SBP | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ascitic fluid analysis | Normal | Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis | Secondary bacterial peritonitis | Hepatic ascites | Cardiac ascites | Nephrogenic ascites | Pancreatic ascites | Tuberculous ascites | Malignant ascites |
Gross appearance | cloudy or turbid | turbid or purulent | clear straw or milky | clear to pale yellow | straw colored or chylous | milky or cloudy or turbid | milky or normal | milky or bloody | |
Leukocyte count and differential | ≥ 250 PMN | > 1000
predominantly PMN |
≥ 250 PMN or normal | - | < 250 mononuclear | - | ≥ 250 PMN or normal | - | |
Total protein | ≥ 25 g/L | > 25 g/ L | < 25 g/L | < 25 g/L | < 25 g/L | ≥ 25 g/L | ≥ 25 g/L | ≥ 25 g/L | |
Serum-ascites albumin gradient | < 1.1 g/dL | ≥ 1.1 g/dL | ≥ 1.1 g/dL | < 1.1 g/dL | < 1.1 g/dL | < 1.1 g/dL | |||
LDH(lactate dehydrogenase) | ↑or normal | > upper limit of normal for serum LDH | ↓ | ↓ or normal | ↑or normal | ↑or normal | ↑ | ||
Glucose | ↓ | < 50 mg/dL | normal | normal | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ||
Amylase | - | normal | - | ↑ | - | ↑or normal | |||
Tumor markers | - | ↑or normal | normal | ↑or normal | ↑or normal | ↑ | |||
Additional analyses | bacteriology | bacteriology,
CEA >5 ng/ml Alkaline phosphatase > 240 units/ L |
laparoscopy, peritoneal biopsy, bacteriology, PCR. | cytology |
Approach to the diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
Diagnostic Paracentesis ❑ Perform ascitic fluid cell count and differential ❑ Perform ascitic fluid culture (Inoculated at bedside) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PMN ≥ 250cells/mm³ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If YES ❑ Presumptive SBP ❑ Begin empiric antibiotic therapy(eg:Cefotaxime 2g IV q8H and ❑ IV Albumin on day 1 & day 3 IF serum creatinine 1mg/dl, BUN > 30mg/dl or total albumin > 4mg/dl | IF NO ❑ Look for the signs/symptoms of Infection | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is Culture Positive ? | Absent Symptoms ❑ Is Culture Positive? | Symptoms Present ❑ Begin Empiric Antibiotic Therapy for SBP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Negative Culture ❑ Complete 5 day Antibiotic Course | Confirmed SBP ❑ Narrow the spectrum based on the susceptibility to complete the 5 day course | Culture Negative ❑ No Antibiotics indicated | Culture Positive ❑ Bacterascites: Repeat diagnostic paracentesis when the culture growth is discovered | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routine laboratory studies for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis include:
- Complete blood count and differential count to confirm infection.
- BUN, S.creatinine to asses the renal function.
- ABG analysis
- S.glucose
- Blood culture may be useful in sepsis
- Serum electrolytes
- Liver Function tests and serum.bilirubin to assess the liver function.
- Coagulation profile
- Urine analysis and culture to rule out asymptomatic bacteriuria
- Amylase and Lipase levels to rule out pancreatitis as the cause of ascites
Diagnostic paracentesis:
Performed usually within 72hrs of admission.[2]
Indications for diagnostic paracentesis |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
Given the similarities in presentation between the variants of ascitic fluid infection and the inability to clinically distinguish spontaneous from secondary peritonitis, the diagnosis of SBP should be through abdominal paracentesis as it has been shown to be safe with a low risk for complication, even in patients with marked coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia.
Ascitic Fluid Analysis
- Ascitic fluid analysis is the gold standard and is required for the confirmation of the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
- As high index of suspicion must exist for ascitic fluid infection in a cirrhotic patient.
- The following tests are recommended for suspected infection of the ascitic fluid:
- Cell count with differential : Absoulte neutrophil count - a total count of >250 cells/mm3 confirm the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
- It is the most sensitive and single best test in diagnosing ascitic fluid infection.
- Although, not all cases in which the PMN count is above this threshold represent infection, values in this range can also be seen with hemorrhage into ascites, peritoneal carcinomatosis, or pancreatic ascites.
- A useful distinguishing feature is that the PMN is usually not the predominant cell type in these cases
- Ascitic fluid culture.[3]
- Performed before initiating antibiotic therapy by
- By bedside inoculation of ascitIc fluid ≥ 10 mL into blood culture bottles, instead of sending the fluid to the laboratory in a syringe or container, since immediate inoculation improves the yield on bacterial culture from approximately 65% to 90%, when the ascitic fluid cell count is at least 250 cells/mm3.
- Separate and simultaneous blood cultures should also be obtained, as up to 50% of patients with SBP have concomitant bacteremia.
- When culture is positive, the most common organisms are Gram-negative bacteria (mainly Escherichia coli) and Gram-positive cocci (usually Streptococcus spp. and enterococci).[4][5]
- Neither sensitive/specific.
- But is indicated to rule out secondary peritonitis caused by many organisms usually anaerobes and also to guide and narrow down the appropriate antibiotic of choice based on the culture and sensitivity results.
- Gram stain to identify the number of organisms causing peritonitis.
- Total protein
- Lactate dehydrogenase
- Glucose
- Amylase
- Albumin (if SAAG unknown) concentration - it is important for the calculation of serum-ascites albumin gradient , and helps us in identifying the portal hypertension and associated prognosis.
- Serum-ascites albumin gradient (if not calculated before)
- AFB smear and culture
- Paracentesis reveals an ascitic fluid with, most commonly,
- A total white cell count of up to 500 cells/mcL with a high polymorphonuclear (PMN) cell count (250/mm3 more) and a
- Protein concentration of 1 g/dL (10 g/L) or less,low protein concentration is noticed in cases of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis which differentiates it from secondary bacterial peritonitis where it is normal.
- Corresponding to decreased ascitic opsonic activity.
- Some patients may have an ascitic neutrophil count <250 cells/mm3 with positive cultures. This is known as "bacterascites".
- These patients should undergo a repeat paracentesis.
- Patients with signs of Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or in whom the repeat ascitic neutrophil count is >250 cells/mm3 should receive antibiotic therapy.
- If not, they should be followed up.[1]
- Absoulte neutrophil count - a total count of >250 cells/mm3 confirms the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
- If the diagnosis is doubtful, the serum procalcitonin level has a 95% sensitivity, and 98% specificity with a 0.75 ng/mL cutoff.[6]
- Recently leukocyte esterase calibrated reagent strips (LERS) to assess the PMN cell count (cut-off of > 250 PMN/mcL) are promised to provide good screening results when the strip turns any hue of tan/brown at 3 min.[7]
- High degree of sensitivity, but the sensitivity is too low for routine use.[8]
- Given the rapidity (90 s), low cost, and availability ‘dipstick’ testing of ascites allows for more rapid diagnosis and management of SBP.
{{#ev:youtube|_r7MaXw1CFw}}
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 European Association for the Study of the Liver (2010). "EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis". J Hepatol. 53 (3): 397–417. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2010.05.004. PMID 20633946.
- ↑ Rimola, Antoni; García-Tsao, Guadalupe; Navasa, Miquel; Piddock, Laura J.V.; Planas, Ramon; Bernard, Brigitte; Inadomi, John M. (2000). "Diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a consensus document". Journal of Hepatology. 32 (1): 142–153. doi:10.1016/S0168-8278(00)80201-9. ISSN 0168-8278.
- ↑ Runyon BA, Canawati HN, Akriviadis EA (1988). "Optimization of ascitic fluid culture technique". Gastroenterology. 95 (5): 1351–5. PMID 3049220.
- ↑ Caly WR, Strauss E (1993). "A prospective study of bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis". J Hepatol. 18 (3): 353–8. PMID 8228129.
- ↑ Sajjad M, Khan ZA, Khan MS (2016). "Ascitic Fluid Culture in Cirrhotic Patients with Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis". J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 26 (8): 658–61. doi:2399 Check
|doi=
value (help). PMID 27539758. - ↑ Viallon A, Zeni F, Pouzet V, Lambert C, Quenet S, Aubert G; et al. (2000). "Serum and ascitic procalcitonin levels in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: diagnostic value and relationship to pro-inflammatory cytokines". Intensive Care Med. 26 (8): 1082–8. PMID 11030164.
- ↑ Honar N, Geramizadeh B, Dehghani SM, Kalvandi G, Shahramian I, Rahmani A; et al. (2015). "EVALUATION OF LEUKOCYTE ESTERASE REAGENT STRIPS TEST IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF SPONTANEOUS BACTERIAL PERITONITIS IN CHILDREN WITH CIRRHOSIS". Arq Gastroenterol. 52 (3): 195–9. doi:10.1590/S0004-28032015000300008. PMID 26486286.
- ↑ Mendler MH, Agarwal A, Trimzi M, Madrigal E, Tsushima M, Joo E; et al. (2010). "A new highly sensitive point of care screen for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis using the leukocyte esterase method". J Hepatol. 53 (3): 477–83. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2010.04.011. PMID 20646775.