Cholangiocarcinoma other imaging findings: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:


===Endoscopic Ultrasound===
===Endoscopic Ultrasound===
[[Endoscopic ultrasound]] can also be performed at the time of ERCP and may increase the accuracy of the biopsy and yield information on [[lymph node]] invasion and operability.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Sugiyama M, Hagi H, Atomi Y, Saito M |title=Diagnosis of portal venous invasion by pancreatobiliary carcinoma: value of endoscopic ultrasonography |journal=Abdom Imaging |volume=22 |issue=4 |pages=434-8 |year= |id=PMID 9157867}}</ref>
*Performed at the time of ERCP  
*Increase the accuracy of the biopsy and yield information on [[lymph node]] invasion and operability <ref>{{cite journal |author=Sugiyama M, Hagi H, Atomi Y, Saito M |title=Diagnosis of portal venous invasion by pancreatobiliary carcinoma: value of endoscopic ultrasonography |journal=Abdom Imaging |volume=22 |issue=4 |pages=434-8 |year= |id=PMID 9157867}}</ref>


===Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography===
===Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography (PTC)===
As an alternative to ERCP, [[percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography]] (PTC) may be utilized.
*Alternative technique for ERCP


===Direct Cholangiography===
===Direct Cholangiography===
Direct cholangiography is a blanket term for any imaging obtained with intra-biliary tree contrast, and includes:
*Evaluation of the the biliary tree
PTC
*Planning treatment as assessing for resectability
ERCP
CT IVC
MRCP
All these modalities not only allow evaluation of the the biliary tree, but are invaluable in planning treatment as assessing for resectability.


===[[Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography]] (MRCP)===
===[[Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography]] (MRCP)===
*[[Non-invasive]] alternative to ERCP.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Schwartz L, Coakley F, Sun Y, Blumgart L, Fong Y, Panicek D |title=Neoplastic pancreaticobiliary duct obstruction: evaluation with breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography |journal=AJR Am J Roentgenol |volume=170 |issue=6 |pages=1491–5 |year=1998 |id=PMID 9609160}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Zidi S, Prat F, Le Guen O, Rondeau Y, Pelletier G |title=Performance characteristics of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the staging of malignant hilar strictures |journal=Gut |volume=46 |issue=1 |pages=103-6 |year=2000 |id=PMID 10601064}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Lee M, Park K, Shin Y, Yoon H, Sung K, Kim M, Lee S, Kang E |title=Preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast imaging with steady-state precession magnetic resonance angiography: comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography |journal=World J Surg |volume=27 |issue=3 |pages=278-83 |year=2003 |id=PMID 12607051}}</ref>  
*[[Non-invasive]] alternative to ERCP.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Schwartz L, Coakley F, Sun Y, Blumgart L, Fong Y, Panicek D |title=Neoplastic pancreaticobiliary duct obstruction: evaluation with breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography |journal=AJR Am J Roentgenol |volume=170 |issue=6 |pages=1491–5 |year=1998 |id=PMID 9609160}}</ref>
*More accurately define the tumor and avoids the risks of ERCP <ref>{{cite journal |author=Yeh T, Jan Y, Tseng J, Chiu C, Chen T, Hwang T, Chen M |title=Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographic findings |journal=Am J Gastroenterol |volume=95 |issue=2 |pages=432-40 |year=2000 |id=PMID 10685746}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Freeman M, Sielaff T |title=A modern approach to malignant hilar biliary obstruction |journal=Rev Gastroenterol Disord |volume=3 |issue=4 |pages=187–201 |year=2003 |id=PMID 14668691}}</ref>
*More accurately define the tumor and avoids the risks of ERCP <ref>{{cite journal |author=Yeh T, Jan Y, Tseng J, Chiu C, Chen T, Hwang T, Chen M |title=Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographic findings |journal=Am J Gastroenterol |volume=95 |issue=2 |pages=432-40 |year=2000 |id=PMID 10685746}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Freeman M, Sielaff T |title=A modern approach to malignant hilar biliary obstruction |journal=Rev Gastroenterol Disord |volume=3 |issue=4 |pages=187–201 |year=2003 |id=PMID 14668691}}</ref>



Revision as of 16:45, 31 January 2018

Cholangiocarcinoma Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Cholangiocarcinoma from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Cholangiocarcinoma other imaging findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Cholangiocarcinoma other imaging findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Cholangiocarcinoma other imaging findings

CDC on Cholangiocarcinoma other imaging findings

Cholangiocarcinoma other imaging findings in the news

Blogs on Cholangiocarcinoma other imaging findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Cholangiocarcinoma

Risk calculators and risk factors for Cholangiocarcinoma other imaging findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Suveenkrishna Pothuru, M.B,B.S. [2]

Overview

Other imaging studies for cholangiocarcinoma include endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic ultrasound, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, and MRCP.

ERCP

While abdominal imaging can be useful in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma, direct imaging of the bile duct is often necessary. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been widely used for this purpose. Although ERCP is an invasive procedure with attendant risks, its advantages include:

  • Determine if there is a bile duct tumor and obtain a biopsy to look for cancer cells
  • Observe if cancer has spread from the bile ducts
  • Help plan surgery
  • Place a small tube (stent) into the bile duct to relieve a blockage caused by a tumor
ERCP image of cholangiocarcinoma, showing common bile duct stricture and dilation of the proximal common bile duct


Endoscopic Ultrasound

  • Performed at the time of ERCP
  • Increase the accuracy of the biopsy and yield information on lymph node invasion and operability [1]

Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography (PTC)

  • Alternative technique for ERCP

Direct Cholangiography

  • Evaluation of the the biliary tree
  • Planning treatment as assessing for resectability

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)

  • Non-invasive alternative to ERCP.[2]
  • More accurately define the tumor and avoids the risks of ERCP [3][4]

References

  1. Sugiyama M, Hagi H, Atomi Y, Saito M. "Diagnosis of portal venous invasion by pancreatobiliary carcinoma: value of endoscopic ultrasonography". Abdom Imaging. 22 (4): 434–8. PMID 9157867.
  2. Schwartz L, Coakley F, Sun Y, Blumgart L, Fong Y, Panicek D (1998). "Neoplastic pancreaticobiliary duct obstruction: evaluation with breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography". AJR Am J Roentgenol. 170 (6): 1491–5. PMID 9609160.
  3. Yeh T, Jan Y, Tseng J, Chiu C, Chen T, Hwang T, Chen M (2000). "Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographic findings". Am J Gastroenterol. 95 (2): 432–40. PMID 10685746.
  4. Freeman M, Sielaff T (2003). "A modern approach to malignant hilar biliary obstruction". Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 3 (4): 187–201. PMID 14668691.

Template:WH Template:WS