Sarcoidosis chest x ray: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* Stage IV: Fibrosis | * Stage IV: Fibrosis | ||
===Gallery=== | ===Gallery=== | ||
[[image:Sarcoidosis stage-II.jpg|thumb|250px|left|Sarcoidosis_stage_II|]] | [[image:Sarcoidosis stage-II.jpg|thumb|250px|left|Sarcoidosis_stage_II|adapted from www.radiopaedia.org]] | ||
[[image:Sarcoidosis stage IV.jpg|thumb|250px|left|Sarcoidosis_stage_IV]] | [[image:Sarcoidosis stage IV.jpg|thumb|250px|left|Sarcoidosis_stage_IV|adapted from www.radiopaedia.org]] | ||
Revision as of 09:58, 29 April 2018
|
Sarcoidosis Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Sarcoidosis chest x ray On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Sarcoidosis chest x ray |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Sarcoidosis chest x ray |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Roshan Dinparasti Saleh
Overview
On chest x-ray, sarcoidosis is characterized by bilateral hilar adenopathy and/or lung infiltrates.
Chest X Ray
An x-ray may be helpful in the diagnosis of the sarcoidosis. On Chest X ray, Bilateral hilar adenopathy on Chest X Ray raises the suspicion for sarcoidosis, especially if the patient has no fever and/or weight loss[1][2]. Scadding[3] proposed a scoring system for pulmonary sarcoidosis according to Chest X Ray findings:
- Stage I: Hilar adenopathy alone
- Stage II: Adenopathy plus lung infiltrates
- Stage III: Lung infiltrates alone
- Stage IV: Fibrosis
Gallery
References
- ↑ Reich JM, Brouns MC, O'Connor EA, Edwards MJ: Mediastinoscopy in patients with presumptive stage I sarcoidosis: a risk/benefit, cost/benefit analysis. Chest 1998, 113(1):147-153.
- ↑ Winterbauer RH, Belic N, Moores KD: Clinical interpretation of bilateral hilar adenopathy. Annals of internal medicine 1973, 78(1):65-71.
- ↑ Scadding JG: Prognosis of intrathoracic sarcoidosis in England. A review of 136 cases after five years' observation. British medical journal 1961, 2(5261):1165-1172.